Ha, well I've always been a shit chess player. But I'm not exactly too hot on poker either. Maybe we are understanding the term "yomi" differently here, but wouldn't two good chess players going at it be employing several layers of yomi to win?
Yomi.
Where you have safe options but a lot of other options as well, all of which have potential and are interesting.
How is Decapre fun?
What is with that anyway?
I will check this after I post.
Dude, you beat me because your combos take a third of my health and I have to open you up a dozen times to get equivalent damage, and then you heal half of it back off of one knockdown while my Ultras are shit.
I have felt that truth. Vulva turtles all match long once he hits me once.
Zero yomi in chess above what kids play. Yomi means you are predicting and making decisions off of predictions. Kids will often say things like "agh, I was hoping you would do that move". That is not how chess works. You calculate as deep as you can and proceed. No, you cannot see everything, but you missing something doesn't make it yomi. A parallel: Ryu does U1 against a Blanka with meter that has been holding down-back for a few seconds. Blanka EX rolls through the fireball and hits Ryu. This is not yomi, it is just an error in understanding the situation. Everything in chess is like this situation. You can learn it, but what you can learn is finite.
Maybe you only play at a casual level, but this is absolutely not true. There is a reason why tournament matches are 6 hours long each.
The game is fundamentally guessing, which I also utikize to great advantage at times. Focus attacks are a good example. Any time you use a poke that cannot be special canceled like Blanka's c.HP, you risk getting countered if your opponent guessed right. Baiting options is the name of the game in SF4.
Let me rephrase: the goal in chess is to assert yourself on such a way that you are completely unassailable, and most chess games reach such a point through one player being more careful than another. The fighting game notion of "never give up" does not apply. Once one player gains significant advantage in high level play, the other player typically resigns. This significant advantage might be equivalent to a 20% health difference in Street Fighter.
1. I <3 rushdown characters with schenanigans.
That isn't yomi, though. It is knowledge through experience.
RIP Poongko's fight stick at the end.
And we are done.
Top level chess players will know all the normal patterns from many game positions. Leading your opponent into a particular defense or offence and switching it up is all part of the game. This is why not all games go 6 hours, players will recognise when they have made a mistake and call it early.
Most games are 60 in 2 game in 1 for each player. The point is that you get a ton of time. When I played professional chess, most of my games went 3 hours minimum. As I got more experienced, they went more to 4-5 on average. It half depends on how much your opponent thinks, though. I have played plenty of matches where we both used 2.5+ hours each.
Those air throw combos are hot.
Hakan is actually pretty appealing to me. Beef made him look pretty fun. What is your definition of "technical"? It tends to get used to mean high execution or thoughtful/complicated, I noticed. I loathe stance characters, though. I hate having to master multiple movesets for one character. I will only make an exception for Eliza.
looks like this year chavelo got the smedwicks treatment.
I am working on the timing for a throw after a lightning, but I keep screwing it up in training mode. Do keep in mind that this is my second day playing the character. I am just not sure if I am enjoying myself enough to continue on. My claim, as best as I can recall, was never that I have mastered Blanka in two days.
