MS: Xbox One June 2014 sales more than double May 2014's sales

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd support that. Are we really that interested in sale numbers to discuss it in circles ? Once you've noticed that sales went up but not as much as one may have hoped, you've basically said everything.
Why? No discussion allowed?
What's the issue? Does it hurt some people when we're discussing sales of the consoles?
 
PS4 was about double Xbox One's sales in May wasn't it?

If so that doesn't sound too impressive. I mean sure it doubled. But it doubled to reach PS4 level...

It's also skewed by some of those June buyers being hood offs from May because the cheaper kinect less sku was announced halfway through May. So it is 'more than double' from a depressed previous month

We won't really know a proper view of demand until at least next month. But we are in the quieter months anyway, so probably should wait for the fall numbers to start coming in.
 
No, it didn't. And this is something quite a few people bring up for a while now (since early 2013 actually), but it is still not true. The Xbox 360 is still leading the PS3 in overall worldwide sales at last count.

So if you take the release of of XBO/PS4/WiiU as the end of last gen then the PS3 ended up last. If you wanna measure the sales up until these companies manufacture last gen consoles then maybe the PS3 might end up selling more than the 360.

But not yet.
What? I'm pretty sure the PS3 worldwide sales have surpassed Xbox 360 worldwide sales. It made the news a little while back if I remember correctly. Will dig for a link and edit this post as I am on my phone right now.
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121398313 said:
We still don't know how much of this lower monthly demand is caused by the extremely high sales we saw in November-December. PS4 has handily outsold pretty much everything at this stage in its lifecycle.

xbox one has also outsold everything else launch aligned, except for the ps4. my hypothesis is that this fanbase was basically trained over the last eight years to buy everything at the start, so all sales are extremely frontloaded. that would also include the consoles themselves.

other people believe that sales are slow right now until better games come out. i would agree with that too, but i have to wonder how far sales are going to jump in 2015 or 2016. it's not like the ps3 or 360 are looking like a late-gen ps2 right now either. it might be unrealistic to expect 40 million out of either one of these systems in the united states.
 
I think its posts like this:



...which he is talking about. Its a positive thread about MS selling more than the previous month. Great. Then people have to come in and say "well the PS4 sold more!" and its 20 pages of this back and forth when really, its just saying that sales are up for MS which is a positive thing - and it doesnt really mean that PS4 sales dropped at all.

It's not positive or negative, it's a thread offering a piece of information which we are discussing.

This "stop shitting in a positive thread" has to end, threads aren't positive or negative, they are informative.
 
What? I'm pretty sure the PS3 worldwide sales have surpassed Xbox 360 worldwide sales. It made the news a little while back if I remember correctly. Will dig for a link and edit this post as I am on my phone right now.

It's gone back and forth over the years. There were reports of the PS3 being higher in 2011, 2013, etc. I think the most recent report is like 83.3 million X360s and 80 million PS3s, but the PS3 number hasn't been updated in a while. It wouldn't surprise me if they keep being really close and keep going back and forth a little until manufacturing of them ends.
 
It's not really an opinion, it's mostly fact. Sales did get better, and the idea that MS expected even better may be speculative but also one with which most people seem to agree (I haven't read any different position anyway, but I didn't go through the 18+ pages of the thread). So I don't see much to discuss there.

I like how you admitted not reading the previous pages, heck it doesn't seem you read that page anyway. Not only there are different opinions in this thread, there also different topics discussed here.

"I haven't read any different position anyway", really? In the same page we two people having different opinion.

But like I said I don't want to spoil the party and won't follow the thread anyway ; keep discussing if you want, it's not like I can or want to do anything about it. I was just expressing my feeling about shacklemcgee's suggestion.

That's one to show us that you're better than us and our stupid discussions.
 
What? I'm pretty sure the PS3 worldwide sales have surpassed Xbox 360 worldwide sales. It made the news a little while back if I remember correctly. Will dig for a link and edit this post as I am on my phone right now.

Here let me help you out.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...to-remain-revenue-mainstays-for-years-to-come
WED 09 JAN 2013 10:12PM GMT / 5:12PM EST / 2:12PM PST
...
The report also highlights that just this past December, Sony's PS3 managed to surpass the number of Xbox 360s shipped worldwide (about 77 million vs. 76 million), despite the PS3 launching a year later.

Oh and about the meta debate...These discussions aren't just about what happened, but also why it happened.
 
It's not positive or negative, it's a thread offering a piece of information which we are discussing.

This "stop shitting in a positive thread" has to end, threads aren't positive or negative, they are informative.

Cmon dude. As if there arent some people that come into threads with a pre-disposed negative disposition on the issue at hand.
 
...which he is talking about. Its a positive thread about MS selling more than the previous month. Great. Then people have to come in and say "well the PS4 sold more!" and its 20 pages of this back and forth when really, its just saying that sales are up for MS which is a positive thing - and it doesnt really mean that PS4 sales dropped at all.

This thread is only a positive if you naïvely take Microsoft's PR at face value.

Doubling last month's anemic sales when you just had a 100$ pricecut is really not something to cheer about. Surely you understand this.
If anything, I'd say it's actually a negative thread, seeing as most would have expected Microsoft PR to come out with "We're the #1 selling platform in June". It's clear that they aren't.
 
Hmmmm getting out I front of npd numbers, I'm guessing they still got out sold by sony or they'd have waited for npds and shouted from the rooftops being the best selling console last month.
 
Has this thread picked apart the language in

Since the new Xbox One offering launched on June 9th, we’ve seen sales of Xbox One more than double* in the US, compared to sales in May

June is 5 weeks, new $399 offer kicked in June 9th - so about 1 week in.

Are they actually saying June total >2x May total? Or can that mean that the remaining 4 weeks of June showed a 2x increase over May weekly sales? Assuming the first week of June was probably even lower than May as it as just before the new price launched, that could man overall sales for June are less than 2x May?

Edit: actually that would make things better for MS

May: 4 weeks, 77k. Averages to 19k per week
June (hypothetical): week 1 - 19k. Weeks 2-5 - 39k. Total for June 175k

If you take the while month of May and apply it to just the post - a June 9th period, you'd get 154k, then add around 19k for week 1, giving you 173k.

So the overall month could be around 175k? I'm just slightly confused by the language they are using.
 
Has this thread picked apart the language in



June is 5 weeks, new $399 offer kicked in June 9th - so about 1 week in.

Are they actually saying June total >2x May total? Or can that mean that the remaining 4 weeks of June showed a 2x increase over May weekly sales? Assuming the first week of June was probably even lower than May as it as just before the new price launched, that could man overall sales for June are less than 2x May?

That's how I read it. I'm guessing they also came third behind WiiU and PS4 for the month and came up with this release to control the narrative.
 
xbox one has also outsold everything else launch aligned, except for the ps4. my hypothesis is that this fanbase was basically trained over the last eight years to buy everything at the start, so all sales are extremely frontloaded. that would also include the consoles themselves.

other people believe that sales are slow right now until better games come out. i would agree with that too, but i have to wonder how far sales are going to jump in 2015 or 2016. it's not like the ps3 or 360 are looking like a late-gen ps2 right now either. it might be unrealistic to expect 40 million out of either one of these systems in the united states.

To be fair, I believe in this as well. It does not make any sense that a fanbase currently trained to buy console games day one wouldn't also buy their console day one. The fanbase just hasn't been trained to wait on purchases.
 
So we're saying that they doubled last month sales... A month the One sold less cause the ppl was waiting for the kinectless SKU... What about the previos Month? How this month will compare with the sales two months ago?
Anyone knows?
 
xbox one has also outsold everything else launch aligned, except for the ps4. my hypothesis is that this fanbase was basically trained over the last eight years to buy everything at the start, so all sales are extremely frontloaded. that would also include the consoles themselves.

other people believe that sales are slow right now until better games come out. i would agree with that too, but i have to wonder how far sales are going to jump in 2015 or 2016. it's not like the ps3 or 360 are looking like a late-gen ps2 right now either. it might be unrealistic to expect 40 million out of either one of these systems in the united states.

I thought the monthly figures don't back that up anymore? The huge numbers at launch might mean the LTD is still ahead of 360 etc, but that is going to get eaten up fast as launch aligned monthly figures are significantly below 360 now.



So we're saying that they doubled last month sales... A month the One sold less cause the ppl was waiting for the kinectless SKU... What about the previos Month? How this month will compare with the sales two months ago?
Anyone knows?

Some math done earlier suggested it could be roughly on par with April weekly numbers. We'll surely get a better picture when the NPD results come out later today
 
To be fair, I believe in this as well. It does not make any sense that a fanbase currently trained to buy console games day one wouldn't also buy their console day one. The fanbase just hasn't been trained to wait on purchases.

It could be a shift in culture or buying habits, sure. But it could also be the simple fact that there were enough PS4s and Xbones on shelves for people to buy, unlike in previous generations.
 
This is disastrous for MS.

US is by far their strongest country and unlike the PS3 they do not have EU and Japan to pick up.

People may not realise but this very much looks like 360 vs PS3 this year.

360 vs PS3 (2007 first 5 months)

1050k vs 665k

385k difference

PS4 vs XB1 (2014 first 5 months)

1320k vs 902k

418k difference

Bearing in mind Sept - Dec is where the 360 really dominated could we be seeing the same gap with PS4 vs XB1.
 
Not sure about that. It's essentially a less powerful PS4 with 95% of the same games at the same price. Maybe $350 would of worked better as it would be cheaper than PS4, but it's probably not realistic. At least the Kinect gave it some features the PS4 didn't have. I think if Kinect was left in for $400, it could of did more damage.

That might be true, but I am sure that is not why Microsoft created the Kinectless SKU.

A $399 Full SKU might have dealt some damage, but if Sony responded with $349 or $299 Microsoft would not be able to counter that ($50-$100 per console loss might be OK for MS, but sure not $150-$200)

With the Kinectless SKU Microsoft is able to match any Sony price drop, even undercut Sony's pricedrops or what is most obvious start a price war this holiday season if XB1 sales do not increase.

Even if that was not the initial idea by now Microsoft probably has realized it and will act accordingly with Kinectless SU at $399 obviously not been seen as a better value than say the Titanfall bundle.
 
Has this thread picked apart the language in



June is 5 weeks, new $399 offer kicked in June 9th - so about 1 week in.

Are they actually saying June total >2x May total? Or can that mean that the remaining 4 weeks of June showed a 2x increase over May weekly sales? Assuming the first week of June was probably even lower than May as it as just before the new price launched, that could man overall sales for June are less than 2x May?

Edit: actually that would make things better for MS

May: 4 weeks, 77k. Averages to 19k per week
June (hypothetical): week 1 - 19k. Weeks 2-5 - 39k. Total for June 175k

If you take the while month of May and apply it to just the post - a June 9th period, you'd get 154k, then add around 19k for week 1, giving you 173k.

So the overall month could be around 175k? I'm just slightly confused by the language they are using.

They don't give an end date so maybe it's sales from June 9th until July 16th.

We're still getting MS NPD PR later today, right?

Very possible we aren't since they are going out early like this....
 
I thought the monthly figures don't back that up anymore? The huge numbers at launch might mean the LTD is still ahead of 360 etc, but that is going to get eaten up fast as launch aligned monthly figures are significantly below 360 now.

well yeah. the big mystery is going to be finding out why the monthly sales are so low. unlike the ps4, the xbox one has had a lot more energy put towards it with more marketing and just effort to make people aware of it. it doesn't seem like a whole lot has helped so far.
 
well yeah. the big mystery is going to be finding out why the monthly sales are so low. unlike the ps4, the xbox one has had a lot more energy put towards it with more marketing and just effort to make people aware of it. it doesn't seem like a whole lot has helped so far.

It's just an inferior console with no redeeming qualities. A console with objectively worse hardware, a not particularly strong bench of exclusives, and that has no other major selling point. I don't think we've ever seen this before, have we? At least not since Sega was around, the Saturn and Dreamcast arguably both qualify. What we're seeing is the answer to the question of "what happens when you release a console that is a straight downgrade to its nearest competitor?" and the answer is that it just doesn't sell that well and that there's probably nothing marketing can do about it.
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121402591 said:
It's just an inferior console with no redeeming qualities. A console with objectively worse hardware, a not particularly strong bench of exclusives, and that has no other major selling point. I don't think we've ever seen this before, have we? At least not since Sega was around, the Saturn and Dreamcast arguably both qualify. What we're seeing is the answer to the question of "what happens when you release a console that is a straight downgrade to its nearest competitor?" and the answer is that it just doesn't sell that well.

lol
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121402591 said:
It's just an inferior console with no redeeming qualities. A console with objectively worse hardware, a not particularly strong bench of exclusives, and that has no other major selling point. I don't think we've ever seen this before, have we? At least not since Sega was around, the Saturn and Dreamcast arguably both qualify. What we're seeing is the answer to the question of "what happens when you release a console that is a straight downgrade to its nearest competitor?" and the answer is that it just doesn't sell that well and that there's probably nothing marketing can do about it.

So, you're liking your new X1 I take it? Haha yeesh
 
So, you're liking your new X1 I take it? Haha yeesh

I should clarify that when I say it's an inferior console with no redeeming qualities I mean that from the perspective of the market, not from some sort of objective standpoint. Obviously it does have redeeming qualities in the sense that it has some high-quality exclusives and it has unique functionality with Kinect and HDMI input. But that's not really stuff that's caught on like, say, the PS2's DVD capability or the original Xbox's online multiplayer.
 
Has this thread picked apart the language in



June is 5 weeks, new $399 offer kicked in June 9th - so about 1 week in.

Are they actually saying June total >2x May total? Or can that mean that the remaining 4 weeks of June showed a 2x increase over May weekly sales? Assuming the first week of June was probably even lower than May as it as just before the new price launched, that could man overall sales for June are less than 2x May?

Edit: actually that would make things better for MS

May: 4 weeks, 77k. Averages to 19k per week
June (hypothetical): week 1 - 19k. Weeks 2-5 - 39k. Total for June 175k

If you take the while month of May and apply it to just the post - a June 9th period, you'd get 154k, then add around 19k for week 1, giving you 173k.

So the overall month could be around 175k? I'm just slightly confused by the language they are using.

When I first read MS's PR release, I was thinking along these lines as well. That wouldn't be quite so bad. Still, if the XB1 couldn't "win" March with Titanfall and couldn't win June with a $100 price cut, I think Sony has a good hold on the monthly numbers for the foreseeable future.
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121402591 said:
It's just an inferior console with no redeeming qualities. A console with objectively worse hardware, a not particularly strong bench of exclusives, and that has no other major selling point. I don't think we've ever seen this before, have we? At least not since Sega was around, the Saturn and Dreamcast arguably both qualify. What we're seeing is the answer to the question of "what happens when you release a console that is a straight downgrade to its nearest competitor?" and the answer is that it just doesn't sell that well and that there's probably nothing marketing can do about it.

*GASP* Don't you go bringing Dreamcast into this. What did it ever do to you huh? It still hurts man. Leave it alone you meanies :'(

I think you're reaching a bit here man. There are plenty of people who actually like the exclusives offered by XB1 (and Dreamcast you meanie). You can't claim objective superiority on that particular front simply because, for the most part, people's likes and dislikes in games are by definition subjective. So maybe to be back in the inferior console declarations a tad.... And leave Dreamcast alone.

Edit: ah well now that you've clarified fair enough but id still tone down the absolutist rhetoric a tad.

Imru’ al-Qays;121403167 said:
I should clarify that when I say it's an inferior console with no redeeming qualities I mean that from the perspective of the market, not from some sort of objective standpoint. Obviously it does have redeeming qualities in the sense that it has some high-quality exclusives and it has unique functionality with Kinect and HDMI input. But that's not really stuff that's caught on like, say, the PS2's DVD capability or the original Xbox's online multiplayer.


PS: Dreamcast is still off limits. :P
 
*GASP* Don't you go bringing Dreamcast into this. What did it ever do to you huh? It still hurts man. Leave it alone you meanies :'(

I think you're reaching a bit here man. There are plenty of people who actually like the exclusives offered by XB1 (and Dreamcast you meanie). You can't claim objective superiority on that particular front simply because, for the most part, people's likes and dislikes in games are by definition subjective. So maybe to be back in the inferior console declarations a tad.... And leave Dreamcast alone.

I don't mean to imply that the Xbone's exclusive roster is inferior to the PS4's - I personally think it is, but that's all preference. Neither console has a particularly strong roster of exclusives this generation. And that benefits the PS4: when neither console has many good exclusives there's no way for the weaker console to justify itself.

Edit: ah well now that you've clarified fair enough but id still tone down the absolutist rhetoric a tad.

I'm not being absolutist for absolutism's sake, though. I just think this console generation is noteworthy for precisely this reason: one console has worse hardware and has no redeeming hardware gimmick or really outstanding exclusive library. In the past the weaker console has always had something going for it, and so we've never really seen what happens when the weaker console doesn't have anything going for it. The PS3 didn't have objectively worse hardware and it had Blu Rays. The Wii had motion controls that caught on like crazy. The PS2 had a library that was objectively superb and played DVDs. Neither the PS1 nor the N64 was blatantly more powerful than the other and both had excellent exclusives.

Microsoft obviously made a gamble that they'd have a successful gimmick that could outweigh their weaker hardware. But the gimmick didn't pay off and now they're stuck with a weaker system, and so we're seeing this scenario play out for maybe the first time.
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121403548 said:
I don't mean to imply that the Xbone's exclusive roster is inferior to the PS4's - I personally think it is, but that's all preference. Neither console has a particularly strong roster of exclusives this generation. And that benefits the PS4: when neither console has many good exclusives there's no way for the weaker console to justify itself.

This is all true enough but you dissed Dreamcast so I still say shame on you sir. Shame!

J/k....
Mostly
 
Has this thread picked apart the language in



June is 5 weeks, new $399 offer kicked in June 9th - so about 1 week in.

Are they actually saying June total >2x May total? Or can that mean that the remaining 4 weeks of June showed a 2x increase over May weekly sales? Assuming the first week of June was probably even lower than May as it as just before the new price launched, that could man overall sales for June are less than 2x May?

Edit: actually that would make things better for MS

May: 4 weeks, 77k. Averages to 19k per week
June (hypothetical): week 1 - 19k. Weeks 2-5 - 39k. Total for June 175k

If you take the while month of May and apply it to just the post - a June 9th period, you'd get 154k, then add around 19k for week 1, giving you 173k.

So the overall month could be around 175k? I'm just slightly confused by the language they are using.

Well it could go the other way too and that the average of those 3 weeks were more then double the average of may/first week of June. Which means it could potentially be even lower. If I had to guess they mean a month on month basis and not a week on week though.
 
Looks like there's a very real chance of ps4 sales for June => xbox one sales for May + June together.

On the brighter side for ms, the effects of the cheaper and more competitively-priced lower end SKU will maybe make themselves felt more around the holiday period.
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121402591 said:
It's just an inferior console with no redeeming qualities. A console with objectively worse hardware, a not particularly strong bench of exclusives, and that has no other major selling point. I don't think we've ever seen this before, have we? At least not since Sega was around, the Saturn and Dreamcast arguably both qualify. What we're seeing is the answer to the question of "what happens when you release a console that is a straight downgrade to its nearest competitor?" and the answer is that it just doesn't sell that well and that there's probably nothing marketing can do about it.
bqtaclZ.gif
 
Looks like there's a very real chance of ps4 sales for June => xbox one sales for May + June together.

On the brighter side for ms, the effects of the cheaper and more competitively-priced lower end SKU will maybe make themselves felt more around the holiday period.

How is more competitive than the $450 Titanfall bundle? You got a $60 game plus a $100 accessory for just $50 more than the current price of the bare bones Xbox One. As a value proposition the $399 Xbox One is a worse deal than what MS was offering earlier - and even the Titanfall bundle couldn't keep up with PS4 sales.
 
Has this thread picked apart the language

Its just their usual sales reminder that the products out there; the list of games they follow it up with isn't claiming those are the reasons people are buying, but are reminding people those titles are coming.

the only thing missing from their usual spiel is mention of Xbox live gold bringing over x million gamers together to play online and enjoy the wide range of services yada yada yada

EDIT:
Imru’ al-Qays;121402591 said:
What we're seeing is the answer to the question of "what happens when you release a console that is a straight downgrade to its nearest competitor?" and the answer is that it just doesn't sell that well and that there's probably nothing marketing can do about it.

I wonder what the people who think Nintendo should have just released a 'standard' console a year ago have to say to this.
 
Imru’ al-Qays;121403548 said:
I don't mean to imply that the Xbone's exclusive roster is inferior to the PS4's - I personally think it is, but that's all preference. Neither console has a particularly strong roster of exclusives this generation. And that benefits the PS4: when neither console has many good exclusives there's no way for the weaker console to justify itself.



I'm not being absolutist for absolutism's sake, though. I just think this console generation is noteworthy for precisely this reason: one console has worse hardware and has no redeeming hardware gimmick or really outstanding exclusive library. In the past the weaker console has always had something going for it, and so we've never really seen what happens when the weaker console doesn't have anything going for it. The PS3 didn't have objectively worse hardware and it had Blu Rays. The Wii had motion controls that caught on like crazy. The PS2 had a library that was objectively superb and played DVDs. Neither the PS1 nor the N64 was blatantly more powerful than the other and both had excellent exclusives.

Microsoft obviously made a gamble that they'd have a successful gimmick that could outweigh their weaker hardware. But the gimmick didn't pay off and now they're stuck with a weaker system, and so we're seeing this scenario play out for maybe the first time.

Interesting analysis. Obviously the XB1 exclusive library will be appealing to some, but I'm inclined to agree with you that -- from a market standpoint -- the exclusive library is not enough to overcome the hardware issues. Halo and Gears just don't have the same sway they used to, and the release schedule for XB1 is fairly barren when you think about it. I'm sure they'll announce more, but I don't see how a weakened Halo Brand, weakened Gears Brand, and Quantum Break are going to save the system. I'm sure it'll do alright in sales until after the release of Halo 5, but...long term I just can't see the XB1 competing at the same level as the PS4 sales wise.
 
If Xbone was the best selling platform in June, MS wouldn't have raised a not-so-overenthusiastic PR the day before the official reveal, right?

To me this is more a preemptive damage control than anything else. Let's see the official numbers.
 
Has this thread picked apart the language in



June is 5 weeks, new $399 offer kicked in June 9th - so about 1 week in.

Are they actually saying June total >2x May total? Or can that mean that the remaining 4 weeks of June showed a 2x increase over May weekly sales? Assuming the first week of June was probably even lower than May as it as just before the new price launched, that could man overall sales for June are less than 2x May?

Edit: actually that would make things better for MS

May: 4 weeks, 77k. Averages to 19k per week
June (hypothetical): week 1 - 19k. Weeks 2-5 - 39k. Total for June 175k

If you take the while month of May and apply it to just the post - a June 9th period, you'd get 154k, then add around 19k for week 1, giving you 173k.

So the overall month could be around 175k? I'm just slightly confused by the language they are using.

My take on this is that it's double the weekly sales for four of the weeks, but the same shitty sales (at best) the first week or probably worse because who's going to buy a few days before a price drop?
So basically somewhere between 154k and 173k. I'll go with 163k. (over twice as bad as May the first week)
 
This PR seems to have work since even in this thread where the numbers have been broken down and explained we still have people going "yay double May". Unfortunately for MS most of these people are already their fan's of Xbox.
 
This is disastrous for MS.

US is by far their strongest country and unlike the PS3 they do not have EU and Japan to pick up.

People may not realise but this very much looks like 360 vs PS3 this year.

360 vs PS3 (2007 first 5 months)

1050k vs 665k

385k difference

PS4 vs XB1 (2014 first 5 months)

1320k vs 902k

418k difference

Bearing in mind Sept - Dec is where the 360 really dominated could we be seeing the same gap with PS4 vs XB1.

Indeed. Or percentage-wise:

360 vs ps3 (2007, first 5 months):
61% vs 39% respectively

PS4 vs XB1 (2014, first 5 months);
59% vs 41% respectively
 
There go my hopes of the Wii U beating the Xbox One for June NPD.

I do agree though, from the sounds of it the Kinectless SDK gave it a boost but it's still not good enough compared to the PS4.
 
How is more competitive than the $450 Titanfall bundle? You got a $60 game plus a $100 accessory for just $50 more than the current price of the bare bones Xbox One. As a value proposition the $399 Xbox One is a worse deal than what MS was offering earlier - and even the Titanfall bundle couldn't keep up with PS4 sales.

Wasn't really thinking in terms of value, only the bottom line for parents buying at xmas comparing to the next box on the shelf. I agree there was more offered in March for not a lot more $s. - a bundle with titanfall and the kinect for $50 more - is that still available? Maybe that's better value for some, potentially not useful for a kids presents being an adult game?
 
How is more competitive than the $450 Titanfall bundle? You got a $60 game plus a $100 accessory for just $50 more than the current price of the bare bones Xbox One. As a value proposition the $399 Xbox One is a worse deal than what MS was offering earlier - and even the Titanfall bundle couldn't keep up with PS4 sales.

The UK had a similar worse deal.

Xbox One with Kinect & Titanfall was £349.
Xbox One - £349

Console was £429 to begin with but you can imagine it doesn't send a good message to consumers. Wouldn't be surprised if it was £299 by November.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom