Flat ones are out this year and will be even cheaper.
Infancy or not, the LG EC9300 kicks the crap out of the ST60 in picture quality.
It's not quite there yet.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/...isn-t-the-best-tv-we-ve-ever-tested/index.htm
But once we put black levels and contrast aside, we had some issues with LG’s implementation of its OLED technology that prevented the set from being the top TV in terms of picture quality. The first was color accuracy, which was a bit off when we compared it to our calibrated reference TV. In our set, there was a color shift toward red; as a result, whites had a reddish-pink tinge, and we were unable to make them completely accurate using the TV’s picture controls. Unlike Samsung, which uses red, green, and blue OLED subpixels, LG's technology, called white OLED, adds a white subpixel to the arrangement, and uses color filters to create red, green, and blue light. We can't say that LG's color shift is due to this implementation, but it does have some manufacturing advantages, which is perhaps why LG is pushing OLED more aggressively than Samsung.
$3000 is too much to spend on a technology that will improve exponentially in the next couple of years. Just my opinion. I'm super-excited about OLED but having owned early LCD TVs I know how much it sucks to see your multi-thousand-dollar investment get completely eclipsed by the next year's model.