I mean I'll grumble a little about FO4 or whatever, but after a day or so, I don't really have the energy to continue debating a game that honestly I don't think is all that.
Way I see it, in terms of what content there is in the game, there is enough stuff that I would have to play flat out fora few days every week to clear the weekly content available to me. More content will be great, it will increase the choice I have, but it does also push it to the point where I won't get everything I can do in a week done. I don't treat it as my job, I run a vault of glass because its fun, I run trials of osiris because its fun. I don't do daily story missions, because story is usually not fun. Other MMO's have much more content sure (I've played a ton of them over a 10 year span, and I still run an EVE account), but other MMO's don't have great gunplay. The expansion costs £40 and that's kind of okay to me, though I think £30 is a fairer valuation - I haven't paid a subscription, nor microtransactions in any way. Likely it comes out, and there's a spate of new activities to add to my weekly choices and I dump some more time into it.
On the developer being pretty obtuse in this interview, its less the person doing the PR and more...if they admit wrong, essentially they force the company to make a business move. A PR guy or a developer likely does not remotely have the authority to do anything like that, so, I dunno it's a pretty rough situation for him and he's dealt with it like this. The important thing is not, 'what the dev said', but can we stir up enough that the product leads greenlight some changes to what we're getting in September, if you're unhappy with it.
Dude, it's a game man.
Why are we expecting a game to give something back. You play a game for fun. This guys got 33 days of fun out of it. If he only got 1 day, you'd be celebrating that 'Destiny has no content'. People will dump hundreds of hours into Fallout and Skyrim and it's no problem, but the tone you've got here man...