I guess that the Patriots are not playing along with the judge's request for all parties to tone down the rhetoric, not that they are under any responsibility to.
I don't know that people still believe the NFL has a good case after the NFLPA filed suit. Here's a good summary:
http://www.stradleylaw.com/deflategate-legal-questions/
What did they do?
I personally think this is now bigger than deflategate. If the NFL win's this may set a very dangerous precedent for all players in the NFL:
- NFL can suspend you for being 'generally aware' (never been done before)
- NFL can suspend you for non-cooperation, i.e. not providing your private communication (never been done before)
I guess they didn't comment on them, but they released a series of emails between Patriots employees and Jeff Pash (NFL General Counsel) asking them to address the erroneous leaks, generally met from Pash with silence or snideness.
I personally think this is now bigger than deflategate. If the NFL win's this may set a very dangerous precedent for all players in the NFL:
- NFL can suspend you for being 'generally aware' (never been done before)
- NFL can suspend you for non-cooperation, i.e. not providing your private communication (never been done before)
Need to re-visit collective bargaining aggreement then
I guess that the Patriots are not playing along with the judge's request for all parties to tone down the rhetoric, not that they are under any responsibility to.
Or even more generally, the NFL can punish you for things they haven't yet defined as punishable at the time of the supposed infraction!
Are those new or were they on the website? I don't remember them but I wasn't sure.
The Patriots aren't involved in that case. It's the NFL vs the NFLPA
I know, which is why I wrote they are under no responsibility to comply.
ESPN hosting an article on why he would destroy the phone.
hmmm...
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...om-brady-crazy-not-destroy-old-cell-phone-nfl
I was embarassed to read that. Especially after he reminded us brady gave the order on the same day he was asked to turn over the data.
If that passes your sniff test, there's something wrong with your nose...
I was embarassed to read that. Especially after he reminded us brady gave the order on the same day he was asked to turn over the data.
If that passes your sniff test, there's something wrong with your nose...
I was embarassed to read that. Especially after he reminded us brady gave the order on the same day he was asked to turn over the data.
If that passes your sniff test, there's something wrong with your nose...
I personally think this is now bigger than deflategate. If the NFL win's this may set a very dangerous precedent for all players in the NFL:
- NFL can suspend you for being 'generally aware' (never been done before)
- NFL can suspend you for non-cooperation, i.e. not providing your private communication (never been done before)
Or even more generally, the NFL can punish you for things they haven't yet defined as punishable at the time of the supposed infraction!
Except Goodell punished Payton for Bountygate even though he wasn't aware of it. Goodell's always had that power. Pats fans were all on board with this when he was hitting Steelers players with fines and one game suspensions for "hard hits" arbitrarily or hitting the Saints for Bountygate.
Payton is a player? Coaches are covered by the Players Association CBA?
Except Goodell punished Payton for Bountygate even though he wasn't aware of it. Goodell's always had that power. Pats fans were all on board with this when he was hitting Steelers players with fines and one game suspensions for "hard hits" arbitrarily or hitting the Saints for Bountygate.
There's a clause basically about "morality and code of conduct" in the CBA that lets Goodell punish someone for everything that isn't specifically defined in the CBA. See: Ray Rice; or whenever someone gets punished for a game for like having a DUI in between weeks (even though it's not written in the CBA that a DUI gets you suspended for a game). It's basically Goodell's "protect the brand" power.
I think the emails being released are due to Kraft feeling like Roger fucked him over. This could get fun.
A few points, Sean Payton isn't covered by the cba only players are, also those examples of dui or ray rice their was direct evidence of wrong doing. Brady's suspension is based on his general awareness of ball tampering and failing to cooperate by handing over his phone, as far as i am aware no player has ever been suspended for those two infractions regardless of which clause the nfl chooses.
Jonathan Vilma got suspended even though it was found out he wasn't even involved. The CBA gives goodell a lot of power and leeway for punishment. Roethlisberger got suspended even though he was never convicted of anything. There's never been rhyme or reason to goodell's punishments. Never has been. I have no sympathy because if that were cam newton instead of Tom Brady; the outrage level would be non existent.
I think the emails being released are due to Kraft feeling like Roger fucked him over. This could get fun.
Vilma's suspension was overturned - twice. Roethlisberger was suspended for "...contribut[ing] to the irresponsible consumption of alcohol by purchasing [or facilitating the purchase of] alcoholic beverages for underage college students, at least some of whom were likely already intoxicated."
This is a commissioner that threatened to suspend Marshawn Lynch for the Super Bowl if he wore gold cleats. Look at the surprise on my face that he suspended Brady 4 games for gamesmanship + mouthing off back to him. If he really wanted to punish Brady; he'd mandate that NE is not allowed to touch their footballs before the game at all indefinitely.
I'm super curious to see if the NFL punishes the Patriots for publishing the emails. The teams are forbidden from badmouthing NFL employees in public; supposed to just tell the commissioner.
That said it will be 2 games and no admittance of guilt. No one will care by 2nd week of September.
Ignoring all the facts and non facts being presented and calling people weird for speaking on the truth. Where is the spin besides it coming from the haters trying to justify falty reports with no real evidence as the pats cheating? Gaf is usually all about the facts when it comes to everything except the patriots I guess.Pats fans are spinning this way too hard.
Sports fans are weird.
This is a well thought article though it doesn't cover all the bases.ESPN hosting an article on why he would destroy the phone.
hmmm...
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...om-brady-crazy-not-destroy-old-cell-phone-nfl
Ignoring all the facts being presented and calling people weird for speaking on the truth. Where is the spin besides it coming from the haters trying to justify falty reports with no real evidence as the pats cheating? Gaf is usually all about the facts when it comes to everything except the patriots I guess.
Its amazing how easily it is to dupe 99.8% of the public.Ignoring all the facts and non facts being presented and calling people weird for speaking on the truth. Where is the spin besides it coming from the haters trying to justify falty reports with no real evidence as the pats cheating? Gaf is usually all about the facts when it comes to everything except the patriots I guess.
Ignoring all the facts and non facts being presented and calling people weird for speaking on the truth. Where is the spin besides it coming from the haters trying to justify falty reports with no real evidence as the pats cheating? Gaf is usually all about the facts when it comes to everything except the patriots I guess.
Nobody can prove it but haters definitely can try and convict before the court of law makes there decision. Atleast going to court you know it could possibly be a fair trial.Denial is not just a river in Egypt.
So true.Nobody can prove it but haters definitely can try and convict before the court of law makes there decision. Atleast going to court you know it could possibly be a fair trial.
You realize that the last three pages have been nothing but Boston fans spinning and propping up homer sports stations as harbingers of truth, right?
Like, this is some next-level, super-dedication to cognitive dissonance. I'm having Xbox One reveal flashbacks.
Nobody can prove it but haters definitely can try and convict before the court of law makes there decision. Atleast going to court you know it could possibly be a fair trial.
It's always entertaining when newcomers show up to the thread to explain to us all what's really going on.
Newcomers?
Dude, I've read the whole thread. And with your posts in particular, it would be too easy to tag quote you.
That would fit right in line with the level of effort you've displayed so far, however.
Newcomers?
Dude, I've read the whole thread. And with your posts in particular, it would be too easy to tag quote you.
Not much effort required, honestly.
Brady cheated, and he's paying for it. Quite simple really. No need to stretch my brain to understand arguments that revolve around a Patriots fan's loose understanding of physics and American law.
Loose understanding of physics? The Wells Report has been torn apart by multiple labs and scientists pointing out the immense flaws in methodology, reasoning and the application of scientific principals. I suggest you go take a look at the wikipedia entry and all of the sources it cites.
Different scientists have different theories.
How do Brady apologists rationalize the text messages from the "Deflator"?
You don't understand the unique culture.Supposedly a weight loss joke, rather odd coincidence considering the circumstances.