Setvan2734
Member
Any way to get this game to run on a direct x 10 graphics card? Ive been able to change a few things to allow the game to even launch, but i get stuck on a black screen with occasional noises which i assume is the main menu
Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain PC performance thread
- Thread starter Enter the Dragon Punch
- Start date
Coma Ecliptic
Member
Everything Maxed out 4K on my Samsung 50JU7500, if you're in the market for a PC monitor/TV I highly recommend it. Yes I know 50 inches is insane, but Amazon messed up my order and upgraded me from 40 to 50 for the same price and you don't say no to free (Unless it's hounds with bees in their mouth).
SLI 980 Strix's 60FPS, occasional little drop to 50's, but rock solid most of the time. I did do HBAO+ and turned off AO in-game. I did turn on Post-Processing to Extra High for now, it looks better that way, but I may just try high based on the guide from NVIDIA.
SLI 980 Strix's 60FPS, occasional little drop to 50's, but rock solid most of the time. I did do HBAO+ and turned off AO in-game. I did turn on Post-Processing to Extra High for now, it looks better that way, but I may just try high based on the guide from NVIDIA.
SmartWaffles
Member
There is no way. The game is a DX11 game, a DX10 card simply can not run it.
They've been up and down. I play disconnected because it seems to try and call home a lot and that adds unnecessary wait time on some menus.
Goldenelementxl
Banned
When people say "maxed" do you mean all settings turned all the way up? And by running "flawless" do you mean 60 fps with no drops? Because I literally have everything maxed and am dipping into the high 40's at 1440p. I have a 5960X and 2 Titan Blacks. It's 56-60 the majority of the time. I'm just having trouble believing people are maxing it out and running it flawlessly with a 970. One of those words isn't being used literally.
SmartWaffles
Member
Kepler doesn't run as well as Maxwell. My GTX970 can run this at 1080p without a single frame drop and at 1440p the lowest fps I saw was 54fps.
Arondight
Member
Runs fine on my computer, turning most things on very high at 1080p using 970, 4790K.
Most baffling thing I've come across is navigating the UI. there's a mouse that works ingame but it requires you to use the keyboard arrow buttons for navigation. And then there's selecting where you hold q then press a number when you could just use the mouse to click it. What am I doing wrong. Sometimes I see playstation button come up with the square,triangles etc.
Most baffling thing I've come across is navigating the UI. there's a mouse that works ingame but it requires you to use the keyboard arrow buttons for navigation. And then there's selecting where you hold q then press a number when you could just use the mouse to click it. What am I doing wrong. Sometimes I see playstation button come up with the square,triangles etc.
On 970 I'm running everything maxed with nvcp hbao+ at 1080p, rock solid 60. At 1440p I would get mostly 60 but some scenes occasionally dipped to 50 or so.
Dick Justice
Banned
Is BB just skinnier here? The GZ sneaking suit looks weird in this game.
Paul Alexander
Member
Anybody else unable to fill out the "name" field?http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/718564-metal-gear-solid-v-the-phantom-pain/72414443 this post says PS4 but I ran into this exact issue on PC. Reinstalling...
GTX 970, running maxed settings at 1080. Locked 60. Like a legitimate locked 60. There was one point when looking at the GPU load it was over 100%, but since I'm overclocked I still stayed 60. That one time GPU load was over 100% was for under a second.
BB is skinnier. If you finished Ground Zeroes and watched the video it shows at the end,
you'd know he's been in a coma for 9 years.
I had this issue also. What I did was alt-tab to desktop then back to the game. Then I was able to use my keyboard to enter my name.
More_Badass
Member
Intel i5-5200U
Intel HD 5500 (Integrated graphics)
- Everything on High expect for Post Processing
- 30 frame lock
Runs so smooth
Intel HD 5500 (Integrated graphics)
- Everything on High expect for Post Processing
- 30 frame lock
Runs so smooth
CertifiedFP
Member
Update on my audio issue. It was a false alarm, nothing game related.
For some reason my sound card was bugged and directional audio as a whole on my PC was inverted. Reinstalling it fixed it. Nothing to see here.
For some reason my sound card was bugged and directional audio as a whole on my PC was inverted. Reinstalling it fixed it. Nothing to see here.
Conor_Fool
Banned
My laptop seems to meet all the minimum requirements except for GHz. Mine is 2.5 and the minimum spec says 3.4. Would this cause a lot of problems?
My graphics card is GTX 860m by the way, so I would also appreciate any feedback from someone with something similar.
My graphics card is GTX 860m by the way, so I would also appreciate any feedback from someone with something similar.
2002whitegt
Member
Impressed so far. Running 4k on a Titan X everything maxed out and HBAO+ and getting 40-55 fps in Afghanistan, which looks great with vsync.
Lowering post processing from Extra High to High gets me a solid 60 fps.
Lowering post processing from Extra High to High gets me a solid 60 fps.
Paul Alexander
Member
I'll give this a shot when it's done installing, thanks.
Dick Justice
Banned
I'm aware of the coma, but I was under the impression that he'd managed to put the weight back on. I guess his normal outfits just have extra padding lol.
I played Ground Zeroes on a i5-337U (1,8 GHz with boost up to 2.7, so I unlocked it to ~2.5GHz with throttle stop) and a GT 630m. Could lock it to stable 30fps on ~mid details. So expect at least that, but since your GPU is way better than mine you should be able to go higher with the settinigs.
Playing with:
GPU: GeForce GT 620
CPU: Pentium (R) Dual-Core CPU E5700 @3.00 GH
RAM: 4GB
On Windows 8.1 pro.
Set it to 720p and everything else is set from medium to high, the game looks and runs amazing.
Everyone in a while it freezes for like a second, no biggie, haven't happen in any fight, haven't seen any sort of big frame rate drops either.
GPU: GeForce GT 620
CPU: Pentium (R) Dual-Core CPU E5700 @3.00 GH
RAM: 4GB
On Windows 8.1 pro.
Set it to 720p and everything else is set from medium to high, the game looks and runs amazing.
Everyone in a while it freezes for like a second, no biggie, haven't happen in any fight, haven't seen any sort of big frame rate drops either.
Fess
Member
I can't see any difference at all... What should I look at? Or is it used to increase the performance? I'm on a 980ti and everything runs nice and smoothly on extra high. It looks blurry at times though but maybe it's just some over-used camera focus effect or the much-talked about sss tech or whatever. Still looks fantastic though.
Phew, good to hear! Glad it's resolved!
Conor_Fool
Banned
Thanks a lot! Really debating whether to go PC or xbone
Shadows, it is really easy to notice the difference on the right side and on the top of the image.
I've got a laptop with an i7-4710MQ and a GTX850m and I can run everything on high at 900p and it runs at or near 60fps at all times (so far).
Fess
Member
Thanks yup now I see it, seems like it's mostly about the shadows getting darker, does it affect the performance?
I think I managed to work out a pretty solid 1080p 60.
i5-4670k
GTX 760 4GB
8GB RAM
Settings are a mix of High and Extra High. Volumetric clouds are off because I don't know their performance impact. GeForce experience wants me to push things a little higher but Post Processing and Lighting on Extra High are pretty costly. Also afraid what HBAO+ might do. I've never really had a good feel for how costly that is. I also see suggestions there are ways to get into the files or ini and get a less expensive form of anti-aliasing. True? What is it with PC games these days only having one in-game AA option?
i5-4670k
GTX 760 4GB
8GB RAM
Settings are a mix of High and Extra High. Volumetric clouds are off because I don't know their performance impact. GeForce experience wants me to push things a little higher but Post Processing and Lighting on Extra High are pretty costly. Also afraid what HBAO+ might do. I've never really had a good feel for how costly that is. I also see suggestions there are ways to get into the files or ini and get a less expensive form of anti-aliasing. True? What is it with PC games these days only having one in-game AA option?
ChrisMahoney
Banned
Is anyone able to test this on a Macbook Pro with Intel Iris Pro graphics? I'm wondering if I should install Windows or not.
LonelyIsland
Member
Not my screenshot, but I've noticed my game starting to look like this, particularly where there's shadows. Ingame it's usually fine, but in the cinematics it looks horrible...
SolidSnakeUS
Member
Fuck the fucking keybindings going back to default every time the game closes.
Thanks I have the same graphic card. Will play today
TheLegendOfMart
Banned
Bit of a strange one.
Core i5 4440
Intel HD4600 Graphics
8GB DDR3 1600
I can run Ground Zeroes at 720p with everything off at a playable framerate, does anyone have a comparable performance graphics card could tell me if I could run TPP?
I got it on PS4 but it has decided to kill itself so I have to send it off for repair and I don't want some bellend spoiling the game for me so I need to play it any way I can.
Core i5 4440
Intel HD4600 Graphics
8GB DDR3 1600
I can run Ground Zeroes at 720p with everything off at a playable framerate, does anyone have a comparable performance graphics card could tell me if I could run TPP?
I got it on PS4 but it has decided to kill itself so I have to send it off for repair and I don't want some bellend spoiling the game for me so I need to play it any way I can.
Holdfing
Member
Still waiting for new mod tools.
D
Deleted member 17706
Unconfirmed Member
This port is amazing.
Have everything maxed out and running in 2715x1527 downsampled via the Nvidia tool to 1920x1080 and it still holds an extremely steady frame rate. I've still played through just the prologue and first mission, though.
The downsampling in particular does wonders for the aliasing in the game, which was quite bad when I first booted it up.
Loving the game, too. This is going to be a fun journey.
Have everything maxed out and running in 2715x1527 downsampled via the Nvidia tool to 1920x1080 and it still holds an extremely steady frame rate. I've still played through just the prologue and first mission, though.
The downsampling in particular does wonders for the aliasing in the game, which was quite bad when I first booted it up.
Loving the game, too. This is going to be a fun journey.
j0hnny_385
Member
Hey folks!
Tempted to try DSR on this. (970 on a 1080p TV).
Does GUI scale on DSR?
Tempted to try DSR on this. (970 on a 1080p TV).
Does GUI scale on DSR?
Yep.
VisceralBowl
Member
Those shots are from really early in the game. He might bulk up later idk.
I tried to downsample but it kept pushing all my settings lower when I got back in game. I'm okay with just setting it to max at 1080p with HBAO+.
I am really excited how fine the game runs:
Playing on:
i7 - 3770k - (3.9 Ghz -> Overclocked on 4.1 Ghz)
1x EVGA Superclocked 970
16 GB Ram
Software:
Win 10
Resolution:
1440p
Settings:
Everything on "Super High"
Result:
Only played the Prologue and Mission 1 (and a bit on the Motherbase)
I've got about 56-60 fps. Had one big drop. In the Prologue:
Dropped to 30-32 fps for 2-3 seconds.
But in Mission 1 - The first Open World Mission
- steady 55-60 fps. i may reduce some settings to "high" to really get pure 60 fps.
Hope somebody helps this information
Playing on:
i7 - 3770k - (3.9 Ghz -> Overclocked on 4.1 Ghz)
1x EVGA Superclocked 970
16 GB Ram
Software:
Win 10
Resolution:
1440p
Settings:
Everything on "Super High"
Result:
Only played the Prologue and Mission 1 (and a bit on the Motherbase)
I've got about 56-60 fps. Had one big drop. In the Prologue:
Where the flame guy and the "Psychomantis" are in the Same spot - after you "play dead" inbetween the dead bodies.
But in Mission 1 - The first Open World Mission
Rescuing Kaz
Hope somebody helps this information
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll