Denton
Member
Sadly true, but it feels good at least
Why would I ? PS4 is much more powerful than my 2008 PC was.
Fallout 4 - PS4 screenshots (now feat. PNGs)
- Thread starter Kenzodielocke
- Start date
- Status
Sadly true, but it feels good at least
Why would I ? PS4 is much more powerful than my 2008 PC was.
shit im gonna buy some beers. u guys are bad influence
If only we could all be so lucky when it comes to Fallout 4.
BreezyLimbo
Banned
So you say.
Im sure Bethesda couldve added something to make it look aesthetically pleasing. We dont look back at all PS2 or 360 games and get reviled at how they look.
Granted their art style and palette seems reminiscent of past fallout games, which is a tragedy as it doesnt translate well with their graphical limitations. For example, ultimate spider man on the ps2/xbox is open world and still looks pleasing to this day despite the technical inferiority.
To me, thats the bigger tragedy imo. A need to have a drab aesthetic, it fits the gritty look theyre going for, but its not pleasing to the eye and makes it stick out like a sore thumb.
Sacrifice, Eden. Sacrifice.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
A good amount of objects yea if the demo was any indication.
I find that quite subjective, I don't find it very gritty at all, especially compared to the piss filter. This is actually way more colorful than what you'd expect from fallout. And really? This is what you call visually pleasing to this day? Really? Horrible example.
How have you skirted my last reply then randomly popped up here, looks like you're avoiding me
That factual evidence that RAD put out the exact game they wanted, down to every last feature would be great.
The perfect Dark
Banned
It's Bethesda. They're going to fuck up at least one console version. Nothing new.
It's a recent addition, but yeah, the screenshots in OP are with shitty .jpg compression. People should really enable the .png setting.
Red Blaster
Member
nah, arkham knight proves how much a beast the ps4 is
pc cant compete if a developer knows that theyre doing (like rocksteady)
Glad I just upgraded to 16GB. I'm ready.
AuthenticM
Member
I'm glad they made this game before TES VI. I want that game to be the best it can be on consoles.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
PS4 version? If so that's pretty impressive.
i think what he/she is trying to say is that we have to follow bethesda graphics standard lol
Tripolygon
Banned
That screenshot does not look like it was taken on a TITAN X, and PS4 is more powerful than PS3. Its not that Bethesda claimed or pretended their game looked mind blowing, its just we are in a new gen and people's standards have changed a little bit.
Bethesda better leak some PNG Ps4 screenshots asap.
SpacePirate Ridley
Member
Looks like ass, and its probably not going to look that good on PC either.
That year and a half wating for the a cheaper full edition and all the graphical and gampelay mods people will have done already is going to come handy.
That year and a half wating for the a cheaper full edition and all the graphical and gampelay mods people will have done already is going to come handy.
Maintenance
Member
Clearly taking no risks it couldn't be 1080p and 30fps I see. TBH from those images I'd expect 120fps on PS4!
Oh well I play there games for the experience and quirkiness I find oddly appealing. I always expect mediocre graphics and janky gameplay and looks like that's what I'm getting.
Oh well I play there games for the experience and quirkiness I find oddly appealing. I always expect mediocre graphics and janky gameplay and looks like that's what I'm getting.
E3 2015 Trailer (Gamersryde-Version)
Fallout 4 Gameplay Exploration Trailer (Youtube)
PS4-Version (?)
keep the compression in mind.
Different time of day?
They all look quite bad
starchild excalibur
Member
Definitely looks just as bad as Fallout 3. Yup.
GTR R35_Supra RZ
Banned
That's how you make an open worls game..what's stopping them...5YEARS and same as Oblivion engine..shame
batman2million
Member
dang. Maybe I should cancel my ps4 version for PC.
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
Hmm maybe i missed something here what does RAD have to do with this? Im going to assume someone said something stupid like "graphics dont make a game, just look at how the order turned out"(which is already a tired ridiculous argument). As far as the game they wanted to make. They said in interviews over and over again that's what they wanted to make a cinematic experience
Dictator93
Member
In spite of my lack of interest in the game, this is actually quite exciting. It will be neat to see mods that require 16 GB of RAM or 6+ GB VRAM and stuff.
That depends wholly on your PC. What do you have?
Enter the Dragon Punch
Banned
Hey, maybe it's limited to 30FPS on consoles to help support graphic mods
...hopefully?
...hopefully?
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
ZombieSupaStar
Member
This had to have been a previous gen or cross gen title originally.
ah well.
ah well.
Tatsumi Oga
Banned
Yeah i guess so. I just remember that trailer where at one point they show the different locations and buildings and then a interior with some nice lighting. I just guess it won't be like that in every interior, as the vault picture surely showed.
Dick Justice
Banned
So much emotion when it comes to defending the janky-ass visuals. The main purpose of the thread is to discuss how it looks, so the "B-but gameplay!!!" bullshit is worthless. Besides, as pointed out before, Bethesda games are hardly the pinnacle of game design.
DrROBschiz
Member
Seems to be the case
That said
After watching the gameplay trailers again.. Its not THAT bad
Agreed, on both the lack of general interest and the excitement for mod possibilities
Tripolygon
Banned
Edit: Off topic
The Lone Courier
Member
Ehh guys don't waste your time with Jito he's just baiting you. Refer to the Wanderer trailer thread where he is the first one to do a drive by post regarding graphics.
It's not a ridiculous argument at all, why hold graphics to such a high regard when they neither make a game or raise it to higher levels of appreciation. RAD might have said they wanted to make a cinematic game, I've never seen them say they put out the exact game they set out to make.
So it's baiting to have a differing opinion ,this is exactly what I said in that thread haha. Jog on mate.
People are actually comparing this to Skyrim or Fallout on PS3? (like oh if Skyrim and Fallout ran like crap on ps3 I don't think I have high hopes for this one...) like in terms of performance? Quick question... what are you on?
We all know that was a completely different case and the PS4 isn't nearly as hard to develop for or port from PC.
We all know that was a completely different case and the PS4 isn't nearly as hard to develop for or port from PC.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
On both sides of the fence, yes.
There are also valid criticisms... on both sides of the fence as well.
This. Do we forget all the developers stating they were able to get PC builds of games ported and running on the PS4 within a month's time early on?
Count of Monte Sawed-Off
un33dab@dpu$$y
Dogmeat doesn't look as detailed as Diamond Dog and I'm just offering a reason why.
shinobi602
Member
Uh...looks fine to me. Big step up from Fallout 3 and Skyrim. Of course with things like describing The Witcher 3 as a "buggy mess" and Bethesda games as "unplayable", this sort of over exaggerated response is expected. Sure some textures leave a bit to be desired but there's a lot of detail overall. It's a highly stylized game.
they had so much time to buy whatever engine they want and master it.
Oblivion engine (a version of Gamebryo) was already crap in 2008
Fever pitch hyperbole. Game looks good to me and I'll be shocked if it isn't the most entertaining and memorable experience of the year -- And I'll be equally shocked if it isn't a massive, massive success in terms of sales. So I'm not sure what your image means.
This is what seems to get lost. The weakest point of presentation when it comes to Bethesda games, for me, has always been the animation. It's inexcusably poor in each game up to this point. I'm looking forward to finding out what it's like in FO4. From what I can tell from the limited media I've seen, it seems to be improved at least to a point.
Collateral22
Member
lmfao what am I reading in this thread. People think this looks bad? Get your fucking eyes checked. There is so much more going on graphics wise than any other Fallout or ES game.
DrROBschiz
Member
Naw
I mean there is a little hyperbole here and there but seeing it in motion and paying attention its clear that they were building and iterating on the previous games
Not that you wouldnt expect them to but its yet another Jarring example of a game that wasnt developed form the ground up to take full advantage of current gen hardware.
At least not outside of putting in effects and other bells and whistles
I like the updates to resolution, lighting and overall touch ups. However the base textures, models, animations. Its kind of a mish mash of stuff that looks good and stuff that doesnt and there is a fair bit of recycling going on here
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Yeah I don't understand why people get so emotional. Everyone here will probably enjoy the game, I know I will considering how much I love Bethesda's games, but I think it's okay to laugh at the way it looks.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll