And it all traces back to one man...
...Ben Ghazi
Reddit is trying its hardest to downvote this story into oblivion lol..
Lord that reddit.....
But that's sort of to be expected. The individual forums there for every candidate is are likely to just be echo chambers.
What are you talking about? Right now, there are 9 posts about it on the front page of /r/politics and 2 on the front page of /r/technology, with most of them sitting at around 90% upvoted and the lowest at 73%.
Don't Not be Clinton
Hilrod is a corrupt sleazebag, wouldn't surprise me to know she's got puppetmaster shit going on all over the campaign.
...Ben Ghazi
"It's like if someone left their front door open, so you leave a note on the inside of their house to let them know what happened. And then you maybe go looking through their house to see if any other doors or windows were left open.".
Also the timing for all of this is just WAY too coincidental. I'm smelling plants, and not the good kind. Sanders has a public record going back DECADES where he never did stuff like this himself. Now suddenly people in his staff screw him out of the running by way of a breach? Who's to say they weren't approached by outside people and bribed to do this? Who's to say those outside people don't have some connection to Hilary, or Trump even?
I mean, it's not an outlandish assumption. They recently proved P. Diddy was connected to Tupac's murder but the LAPD shut that investigation down because "reasons". Never underestimate people in power. We'll never have anyone outright say "yeah we infiltrated the campaign and got it shut down just in time for general election". No one'll come out to say that, b/c they'll be killed before saying it. They don't care about people like me saying it b/c we're not in a position of power. And they like all of their supporters dismissing the possibility and calling us conspiracy theorists b/c that's just an easy way to write off people without being critical of your own stance.
It is all simply too convenient. This is why the voting process is a complete farce at the higher level.
Trying but not really succeeding. The mods have removed a lot of threads that have headlines that don't angle the story in a certain way. The top stories basically reading as "Sanders threatens to sue !" "Why did the DNC leak this? Shillary's plan?" "Sanders Camp: The DNC is trying to undermine our campaign!"What are you talking about? Right now, there are 9 posts about it on the front page of /r/politics and 2 on the front page of /r/technology, with most of them sitting at around 90% upvoted and the lowest at 73%.
What do you mean?Come on dude, Sanders's staff has been fucking up since day one. Barely a week has gone by where they haven't made an unforced error. Them doing something stupid like this was inevitable.
Also the timing for all of this is just WAY too coincidental. I'm smelling plants, and not the good kind. Sanders has a public record going back DECADES where he never did stuff like this himself. Now suddenly people in his staff screw him out of the running by way of a breach? Who's to say they weren't approached by outside people and bribed to do this? Who's to say those outside people don't have some connection to Hilary, or Trump even?
I mean, it's not an outlandish assumption. They recently proved P. Diddy was connected to Tupac's murder but the LAPD shut that investigation down because "reasons". Never underestimate people in power. We'll never have anyone outright say "yeah we infiltrated the campaign and got it shut down just in time for general election". No one'll come out to say that, b/c they'll be killed before saying it. They don't care about people like me saying it b/c we're not in a position of power. And they like all of their supporters dismissing the possibility and calling us conspiracy theorists b/c that's just an easy way to write off people without being critical of your own stance.
It is all simply too convenient. This is why the voting process is a complete farce at the higher level.
Clinton campaign released a statement
![]()
What do you mean?
What do you mean?
Unforced error is a sports phrase that means "shooting yourself in the foot." Meaning, it's an error that you cause on your own rather than having your opponent make some move against you that causes you to stumble.
After one Sanders account gained access to the Clinton data, the audits show, that user began sharing permissions with other Sanders users. The staffers who secured access to the Clinton data included Uretsky and his deputy, Russell Drapkin. The two other usernames that viewed Clinton information were talani" and "csmith_bernie," created by Uretsky's account after the breach began.
Sanders' campaign just did something shitty. It's ok, not the end of the world.Also the timing for all of this is just WAY too coincidental. I'm smelling plants, and not the good kind. Sanders has a public record going back DECADES where he never did stuff like this himself. Now suddenly people in his staff screw him out of the running by way of a breach? Who's to say they weren't approached by outside people and bribed to do this? Who's to say those outside people don't have some connection to Hilary, or Trump even?
I mean, it's not an outlandish assumption. They recently proved P. Diddy was connected to Tupac's murder but the LAPD shut that investigation down because "reasons". Never underestimate people in power. We'll never have anyone outright say "yeah we infiltrated the campaign and got it shut down just in time for general election". No one'll come out to say that, b/c they'll be killed before saying it. They don't care about people like me saying it b/c we're not in a position of power. And they like all of their supporters dismissing the possibility and calling us conspiracy theorists b/c that's just an easy way to write off people without being critical of your own stance.
It is all simply too convenient. This is why the voting process is a complete farce at the higher level.
After one Sanders account gained access to the Clinton data, the audits show, that user began sharing permissions with other Sanders users. The staffers who secured access to the Clinton data included Uretsky and his deputy, Russell Drapkin. The two other usernames that viewed Clinton information were “talani" and "csmith_bernie," created by Uretsky's account after the breach began.
Agent Smith is a fictional character in the The Matrix franchise. He is portrayed by Hugo Weaving (and briefly by Ian Bliss) in the films and voiced by Christopher Corey Smith in The Matrix: Path of Neo.
Also the timing for all of this is just WAY too coincidental. I'm smelling plants, and not the good kind. Sanders has a public record going back DECADES where he never did stuff like this himself. Now suddenly people in his staff screw him out of the running by way of a breach? Who's to say they weren't approached by outside people and bribed to do this? Who's to say those outside people don't have some connection to Hilary, or Trump even?
I mean, it's not an outlandish assumption. They recently proved P. Diddy was connected to Tupac's murder but the LAPD shut that investigation down because "reasons". Never underestimate people in power. We'll never have anyone outright say "yeah we infiltrated the campaign and got it shut down just in time for general election". No one'll come out to say that, b/c they'll be killed before saying it. They don't care about people like me saying it b/c we're not in a position of power. And they like all of their supporters dismissing the possibility and calling us conspiracy theorists b/c that's just an easy way to write off people without being critical of your own stance.
It is all simply too convenient. This is why the voting process is a complete farce at the higher level.
Sanders' campaign just did something shitty. It's ok, not the end of the world.
First, a one page-style report containing summary data on a list was saved out of VoteBuilder by one Sanders user. This is what some people have referred to as the “export” from VoteBuilder. As noted below, users were unable to export lists of people.
For a brief window, the voter data that is always searchable across campaigns in VoteBuilder included client scores it should not have, on a specific part of the VAN system. So for voters that a user already had access to, that user was able to search by and view (but not export or save or act on) some attributes that came from another campaign.
Bernie never ever had a chanceI don't even care if it was malicious or not, fuck Hilary and her corporate campaign. Within reason the goal justifies the methods to stop her nomination. This might end up badly though looking at the fact that people in general care more about drama than the improvements of their own lives.
You're right. It's just the end of America.Sanders' campaign just did something shitty. It's ok, not the end of the world.
No, it's the definition of an outlandish assumption. You're letting your bias lead you to an assumption. Based off what we know, it was a Bernie staffer. The beauty of conspiracy theories is the lack of evidence to prove it is part of the conspiracy theory. Cherry pick the narrative you like, ignore everything else. Don't go down that road, man. You can be supportive of Sanders and not okay with a member of his staff fucking up royally.
It's pretty funny that these posts are right next to each other.
I'm still not sure what the "shitty" thing the campaign supposedly did is. No data was exported
Here's MSNBC's interview with the staffer
http://www.msnbc.com/thomas-roberts/watch/fired-sanders-campaign-staffer-speaks-out-588356675888
Get your facts straight. Read the OP, the updates are right there.
Also the timing for all of this is just WAY too coincidental. I'm smelling plants, and not the good kind. Sanders has a public record going back DECADES where he never did stuff like this himself. Now suddenly people in his staff screw him out of the running by way of a breach?
Read. The link I posted is FROM THE COMPANY THAT HOSTS THE DATABASES.
THERE IS A FUCKING VIDEO OF THE SANDERS DATA DIRECTOR ADMITTING WHAT HE DID.
Jesus Christ.
Well Watergate did happen just before Nixon won a landslide election, it was his own insecurity that drove himThe thing that really baffles me about the conspiracy theorists is that I find it really hard to believe Clinton would be involved in something so obviously stupid. Why risk something which will do damage to the entire Democratic ticket to take out a guy who isn't beating you? Why split and ossify the base when you know you're already the most electable option and the GOP so far is only offering a field of circus performers as competition?
I do admit that BernGhazi is the catchiest tagline so far this election
Read. The link I posted is FROM THE COMPANY THAT HOSTS THE DATABASES.
THERE IS A FUCKING VIDEO OF THE SANDERS DATA DIRECTOR ADMITTING WHAT HE DID.
Jesus Christ.
So the company that actually maintains and fixes these databases is lying? Read the post, "saving" data means a different thing here.
So the company that actually maintains and fixes these databases is lying? Read the post, "saving" data means a different thing here.
I don't know why I even bother.
The thing that really baffles me about the conspiracy theorists is that I find it really hard to believe Clinton would be involved in something so obviously stupid. Why risk something which will do damage to the entire Democratic ticket to take out a guy who isn't beating you? Why split and ossify the base when you know you're already the most electable option and the GOP so far is only offering a field of circus performers as competition?
That's why it doesn't make sense. If she was this master puppet master, why did she not get the nomination in 2008. She held on as long as she could, but where was the "just according to keikaku" level planning then. You don't manufacture this gigantic conspiracy when you're winning, you do it when you're in danger of losing...which as of yet she hasn't been. The risk outweighs the rewards. The core idea of the theory doesn't make sense.
I understand that Sanders' is going for a grassroots campaign and has cultivated a very passionate fanbase...but come on...if you look at this story and your first instinct is to pull up a conspiracy, it's time to back away a bit. At best, it was a staffer who picked the worst possible way to get this issue fixed. At worst, some of his staff was overzealous and took advantage of a situation. It isn't worth circling down the conspiracy drain over. It just makes his supporters seem unreasonable.
This thread is getting more insane as it goes on.
Julian Castro.
and to illustrate this, you quote one of the most level-headed posts on this page
The thing that really baffles me about the conspiracy theorists is that I find it really hard to believe Clinton would be involved in something so obviously stupid. Why risk something which will do damage to the entire Democratic ticket to take out a guy who isn't beating you? Why split and ossify the base when you know you're already the most electable option and the GOP so far is only offering a field of circus performers as competition?
THERE IS A FUCKING VIDEO OF THE SANDERS DATA DIRECTOR ADMITTING WHAT HE DID.
Jesus Christ.