Because initiating physical contact with your friends you have zero desire in dating can make things weird? Isn't that plainly obvious? I have zero problem reciprocating but I'm not gonna be the one to initiate because I don't want them to imply I want anything. .
Well sure, you can indeed make things weird by initiating physical contact with friend you have zero desire. But that's now what I'm arguing now, is it? I'm arguing when you make physical contact on a "friend" you
do have (hidden) interest in. My posts have been an examination of the process of how two people (especially the guy) even get to that place, because it's certainly not spontaneous.
I have zero problem reciprocating but I'm not gonna be the one to initiate because I don't want them to imply I want anything. .
Lol it's like you're writing this for me:
Why not, I ask? Because you indeed don't want anything, ever? Or because you don't want anything outside the context of the (supposedly platonic) relationship that this is? And of course, the kind of relationship that this is determined by the person that initiated the approach (assuming that was the case). You.
You are not friends before knowing people. My points were meant to ask why would you not initially approach someone who you find attractive, with a romantic intent? Why do you befriend someone you clearly like?
I have no idea what you are talking about here. This has zero to do with why I addressed your post. All my post was saying is if you have a friend and they tried to make a move physically, I would have zero problem taking it up because I have no problem distinguishing dick from emotion.
That line here was me asking you, why did you befriend her in the first place if you found her sexually attractive? This scenario presupposes that you are reciprocating because that's the case.
You implied you can't be friends with people you are attracted to. That implies you want more. This is the natural outcome, you know that.
No it isn't. Being sexually attracted to someone means you both imagine and would like to have relations with them. Both physical (sex) and emotional (connection/intimacy). This does NOT mean girlfriend. This means dating, which, as of late I have found most of you guys equate them to monogamous relationship. Dating=non-exclusive. Relationship/GF=exclusive. That you think the natural progression is to make her automatically exclusive, is the reason we have this very thread: men truly don't know how women operate the dating market. Sex and the City is surprisingly non-fictional.
So you didn't read what I actually said? Cause this doesn't even sorta apply to words I typed
Well, you said this:
"
Doesn't mean I'm gonna go on dates with her and try to make her my girlfriend. Why the fuck would I do that?
If I didn't try that shit from the jump..."
I was addressing why you wouldn't make a new acquaintance (you know, a potential friend) romantic interest. Because showing romantic interest from the jump is scary; you could get rejected. You'd rather initiate a platonic relationship while liking her in the hopes you find your chance. And when I say you, I'm not talking you personally.
So now I don't actually understand how you are defining attractive. Good looking? Check. Personality traits I actually enjoy in a human being? Check? I know many girls in my life that fit that definition. I'm not trying to date them despite the attraction. Not interested. That's not rare.
You ought to be confused, because I never defined attractiveness in any of my posts...
Knowing someone is conventionally attractive=/=attracted to them. Your ability to appreciate her conventional beauty and not feel physical and then emotional reaction, is what makes the relationship platonic.
However, when you have a girl that is conventionally attractive that you do find sexually attractive, that causes the issue. Because like I said, following sexual attraction is emotion. If left unchecked, feelings will develop. Not only are you appreciating her physical assets, but you then start envisioning sharing your life with her (you fall in love). If this happen under the platonic pretense, then you are in one hell of a (not good) ride. And so is she, to be honest.
No I agree with this, you can't feel something for someone but claim zero attraction. But where does feelings come into what I took issue with? You can have friends you are sexually attracted to and just flat out now want or desire to be with or do anything with them. You can lack a desire to pursue or a desire to initiate physical contact. If you have people in your life you are sexually attracted to that you just don't want anything from, I don't find that odd.
Well, this is what you initially said:
"If a girl I got along with wanted to kiss me (and I thought she was physically attractive) I would reciprocate..."
You are "friends" with a girl you are sexually attracted to. Which implies you approached her or she approached you in cordial, strictly platonic manner. If it was the former, then you were being disingenuous as you did not approach her with your true intent; you didn't do this because telling a girl you find sexually attractive you'd like to take her out (romantic interest) from the get go kills the chances of ever befriending her, a relationship that is the next best "safe" thing. Your willingness, then, to reciprocate sexual advances from a girl you've considered a platonic friend all along is as unnatural as it is baffling.
Then there's the fact about what I said about physical attraction leading to emotional reaction. You can't have feelings for someone you are not attracted to. So, if you are physically attracted, then that will invariably lead to emotional reaction. This reaction, whoever, is not always overt. When you befriend a girl you find sexually attractive, you are simply mixing the ingredients for a latent emotional response, one that will remain dormant until the woman makes the move. That is why guys fall in love with their best female friends when, say, in a confused moment of emotions these girls kiss them--often in no way representative of their true feelings--guys take this eye-opening opportunity to finally make the move they didn't make in the first place. Sometimes she doesn't have to make the move; sometimes is the guy seeing her going through her post-"Asshole" breakup, to finally say "This is my chance!". And if having made that move in the first place would have meant you wouldn't be fake friends (in the event she rejected you, which, ironically, happens less often than guys think), then people will understand each others' expectations better.
This, however, doesn't apply to people that are attractive but that you don't find so. So we don't completely disagree.