who charges and listens at the same time anyway
people driving or connected to the millions of older external speaker systems
who charges and listens at the same time anyway
Audiophile GAF will not like this.
This rumor also doesn't account for the patent on a new type of headphim me jack that isn't 3.5 as wellI'm not placing too much faith on supply chain rumors 9+ months out from release.
It's also worth noting for audiophiles that the switch to either lightning or USB C could be a boon as you would gain support for digital audio (both in and out) which isn't currently possible obviously with the 3.5mm jack.
The Lightning headphones will be capable of receiving lossless stereo 48 kHz digital audio output from Apple devices and sending mono 48 kHz digital audio input. The input means that the headphones will also support a microphone for audio input following Apples upcoming update. Manufacturers will be able to take advantage of Apple Headphone Remote controls like Volume Up/Down/etc, as well as other buttons for launching specific apps such as iTunes Radio or initiating playback controls on iOS. In addition, the headphones can be made to work specifically with a companion iOS app and launch a specific app when connected to an iOS device.
There are a few benefits of using the Lightning cable to send audio. Apple says the headphones will be able to draw power from an Apple device (even if the device is asleep), which for some products could eliminate cost associated with an internal battery. It could also work the other way around by providing power to an Apple device from an internal battery or external power source. That enables you to listen to music and also use a passthrough setup so you could charge the device simultaneously, much like you can with an audio dock that uses a Lightning connector. The headphones will also be capable of receiving firmware updates.
There are a couple of advantages to using a Lightning port for audio output.
I'm not sure if they're really worth the loss of a legacy port as useful as a 3.5mm socket but if Apple is building it into the OS it would definitely be nice additions.
- You're not limited by the low power codec in the phone allowing you to use 24-bit 192KHz output if you wish.
- You can put 5.1 PCM over the Lightning cable and then use a DSP in the headphones to create a virtual surround soundstage with two drivers.
- Multichannel recording
- Active noise cancellation with no batteries required
Let's not because your version of it is shit.Join us in the 21st century jfc
When Apple removes controversial stuff like this they have never added back. There was outrage when they dropped the floppy, outrage wheat they add the disc drive and so on.Guess I'll skip that iteration then until fan outrage forces Apple to add it back in to a later model.
Yeah, because why support audio output in an universal way when you are Apple and you can make people get specific headphones with specific plugs for your devices at 5 times the price of the normal ones.
Wouldn't it be better if people were pulled away from wired by a superior wireless solution rather than pushed away from wired because maybe wireless will be better at an undetermined point in the future?As my post says, I use wireless and wired in my day. I'd like it to be all wireless, but the tech isn't there yet. Weaning people off wired is a good start. At least to make it a viable alternative.
Wouldn't it be better if people were pulled away from wired by a superior wireless solution rather than pushed away from wired because maybe wireless will be better at an undetermined point in the future?
Aux plebes are the new SD card plebes. We're taking you into the future, stop fighting it.
Realtalk, waterproofing is a lot easier without an audio jack.
It's also worth noting for audiophiles that the switch to either lightning or USB C could be a boon as you would gain support for digital audio (both in and out) which isn't currently possible obviously with the 3.5mm jack.
Aux plebes are the new SD card plebes. We're taking you into the future, stop fighting it.
Realtalk, waterproofing is a lot easier without an audio jack.
Aux plebes are the new SD card plebes. We're taking you into the future, stop fighting it.
Realtalk, waterproofing is a lot easier without an audio jack.
http://www.macrumors.com/2016/01/05/iphone-7-no-headphone-jack-supply-chain/
Thank goodness. I'm glad Apple will kill the decades old, ancient tech of aux input. Good riddance. They'll drag the luddites kicking and screaming into the future, just like they have always done. Look at the past threads on GAF alone about optical drives and Flash. Hilarious.
I also hope someone comes up with a good Bluetooth because today's and tomorrow's Bluetooth is awful. Their motto should be, "Next year!"
Edit: People are confusing the lightning thing. Apple doesn't want you to use a proprietary hook up. They want you to use wireless. They're just giving you lightning as the connected option. Join us in the 21st century jfc
I hope instead of advancing to wireless they replace it with the smaller asymmetrical jack they patented. Just to make the phone .7 mm thinner. No other changes.
You don't need to lose the analog audio out to get that.It's also worth noting for audiophiles that the switch to either lightning or USB C could be a boon as you would gain support for digital audio (both in and out) which isn't currently possible obviously with the 3.5mm jack.
Yeah, but most people aren't audiophiles, use mid range equipment and digital audio is a net negative.
Oh, and Bluetooth audio is trash.
That's the catch 22.
Most people AREN'T audiophiles which is why Apple BT earpods wouldn't be a net negative audio wise to the average joe as the current wired ones they use are hardly an audiophile's wet dream.
Again I think dropping the port for thinness is kinda stupid.
That being said I find it funny audiophile's complaints about this when they should probably be using an external DAC already via the lightning port already anyways.
I like using my ath ck10s without having to lug around a dac so this wouldn't do anything for me.That's the catch 22.
Most people AREN'T audiophiles which is why Apple BT earpods wouldn't be a net negative audio wise to the average joe as the current wired ones they use are hardly an audiophile's wet dream.
Again I think dropping the port for thinness is kinda stupid.
That being said I find it funny audiophile's complaints about this when they should probably be using an external DAC already via the lightning port already anyways.
That's the catch 22.
Most people AREN'T audiophiles which is why Apple BT earpods wouldn't be a net negative audio wise to the average joe as the current wired ones they use are hardly an audiophile's wet dream.
Again I think dropping the port for thinness is kinda stupid.
That being said I find it funny audiophile's complaints about this when they should probably be using an external DAC already via the lightning port already anyways.
I think there's a pretty big gap between the big, mainstream headphone market using $100 dollar earbuds who'd notice a significant decrease over bluetooth and an actual audiophile who'd detect a DAC difference.
who charges and listens at the same time anyway
Oh, and Bluetooth audio is trash.
As my post says, I use wireless and wired in my day. I'd like it to be all wireless, but the tech isn't there yet. Weaning people off wired is a good start. At least to make it a viable alternative.