Boo hoo hoo. Another poor victim of the big bad Pee Cee culture.
What do you actually hope to accomplish by acting this way towards people who you (believe) to be wrong?
Do you think they're realize the error of their ways "Oh this person is mocking me, I must have been totally mistaken about everything"
Grow the fuck up.
You don't like people constantly shouting the "censorship" banner all willy nilly? Give them good, solid reasons why it's not.
Find the actual translated text. Reference the specific lines that make it clear that A. Soliel is a lesbian, B. She was drugged, C. That drugging sitiation is equivalent to a date-rape situation D. In the event A was true, that she was "converted" to straight because of it.
Because so far these are the key points I've seen people here (and elsewhere) claim it to be.
Like I have no doubts that the Japanese at large are still behind the times when it comes to acceptance of homosexual/bisexual depictions.
But literally the only qualm I have in the situation in the first place is the fact that the powder was delivered to her via spiking her drink. Something that is culturally (as in prominent in the media) relevant to current happenings in the US.
Had this been done any other way (Magc spell, wishes, whatever), and the situation was still played out in the exactly the same way (she didn't know about it, was told immediately), it wouldn't be seen in nearly as bad of a context.
It also reinforces patriarchy and the idea that lesbians exist solely for the sexual gratification of heterosexual men. If a lesbian acts independently and pursues her own sexual gratification well, that's clearly not acceptable where's that fucking magic powder! YOU NEED TO LOVE MEN.
Jesus christ.
What?
Like, if we take the entire premise of the powder, it was so that she actually COULD be comfortable around women. By making himself look like a woman, he could act as a control that she would be able to work up a tolerance towards being around without fainting as she appears to do normally.
Like.....
What?
Edit: PS, I agree with the idea that it's not "censorship" in that Nintendo is a corporate entity and Fire Emblem is a product of this entity. They are fully within their rights to make any changes as they see fit to any product they own.
At most people could perhaps argue messing with the "intent of the artist", but then that's impossible to prove without the developers themselves coming out and saying so.