Microsoft Releasing Exclusive Games on PC Is Great for Xbox Owners

MS is gonna need all the money they can get. The Xbox one software sales aren't really all that impressive outside of some shoot bang mutliplayer multiplats with big marketing budgets. Even if they broke even it still would be considered a failure. MS knows this so they pushed QB to PC day one. Remedy is one of those devs that takes forever to get shit done. Hollywood actors + tv show + all that new tech or wtvr. The game was first revealed when the Xbox one was first revealed. The budget for this thing is probably north of 75 mil. If they are serious about making money on PC they need to release it on steam tho. The lifetime sales for QB would be like tenfold on Steam compared to what they would be if its Win10 store only. MS needs to suck it up and give Valve that cut.

Also bring MCC to PC. Make it cross play or cross coop. They are all older games and some of them already been on PC so it won't be that big of a deal. MCC would make Win10 store much more attractive for PC gamers. QB is the type of game that people will just beat and never play again. Halo on the other hand is something many PC gamers could build their library around.


I think if Sony was smart, they'd make their own storefront on PC and do the exact same thing.

$$$$

Good for everyone.

90% of PS4's library is already available on Steam and their 1st party lineup this gen hasn't really blown anyone off their feet. I don't think Sony would have much success on PC unless they really put a lot of effort into it.

I think Nintendo would be a much better candidate. They are already pursuing mobile. They might as well pursue PC to make even more $$$.
 
So what is MS gameplan to block Steam?

Do they need to block Steam? If the Steam user base is predominantly Windows based then MS just needs to give consumers a few incentives to stay that way and keep upgrading to newer versions of Windows.
 
That'll never happen. Why would MS give steam users the reason to switch OS's?

Have they ever blocked anything from Apple, Google, Amazon, etc?

If they dared to block any application that isn't malicious then they'd bring the company down. It's totally against everything the PC is (an open platform). It'd have the entire industry scrambling to reduce their reliance on Microsoft platforms just in case Microsoft ever decided to compete with them and then block their application.

They absolutely wouldn't even dare to try and block steam, anyone that suggests they would is insane.
 
The lifetime sales for QB would be like tenfold on Steam compared to what they would be if its Win10 store only. MS needs to suck it up and give Valve that cut..

I am sure it will eventually, Steam sell the quantity of titles during its sales. I feel they will continue to offer the Xbox/PC combo on their store after pre-order, to help keep the price up for a longer period. When its ready for discounts due to age, push to steam as a PC only sell and let the discounts happen to give it legs.
 
Why are false equivalences being made with the ps4 in this thread? Street fighter is just one game. With the Xbox one we are talking about (potentially) all of the exclusives being on the PC as well. There is a big difference.

Whatever makes you guys feel better I guess.

No there's not a big difference. Sony fans saying SF5 will increase PS4 because it's console exclusive while isn't true when it comes to QB.

The whole thing is just fanboys being delusional. Sony could actually benefited from releasing The Order on PC since it disappointed critically and sales wise.

Every console exclusive should be on PC period. Sony and Nintendo should follow. It's a win for gamers. Why limit my options on where to play the games I bought?
 
That'll never happen. Why would MS give steam users the reason to switch OS's?

Have they ever blocked anything from Apple, Google, Amazon, etc?

Do they need to block Steam? If the Steam user base is predominantly Windows based then MS just needs to give consumers a few incentives to stay that way and keep upgrading to newer versions of Windows.

To force users into using the Windows Store? MS wants into that walled apps gold mine bad.

Of course they won't block Steam overnight. It's got to be a gradual weaning off process.
 
If one buys an Xbox because of an exclusive, there's a possibility that they will buy other games for it. If they don't buy an Xbox there's 0 chance they will buy games for the system.

Hearing it from forum members people are saying they are only getting Tue xbo for their exclusives. If that is the case, MS isn't missing much. I know what you are saying but the number of people on this forum making this argument is for xbo exclusives, not the other games.
 
To force users into using the Windows Store? MS wants into that walled apps gold mine bad.

Of course they won't block Steam overnight. It's got to be a gradual weaning off process.

I really want to see how MS compete with steam and other PC storefront on fair grounds.
Xbox exclusive on Windows store is nice, but I don't think they can win with that alone.
 
To force users into using the Windows Store? MS wants into that walled apps gold mine bad.

Of course they won't block Steam overnight. It's got to be a gradual weaning off process.




But there's no need to even try to block Steam at all. Unless of course I'm not understanding your definition of "block". They will just release their games on the Windows Store while you can go about your business using Steam. I mean, you'll still be able to play games from both stores in the same PC.
 
But there's no need to even try to block Steam at all. Unless of course I'm not understanding your definition of "block". They will just release their games on the Windows Store while you can go about your business using Steam. I mean, you'll still be able to play games from both stores in the same PC.

Lol people treat other stores like rival gangs. If your set ain't steam we don't trust you.


But then they go complain about shitty service that steam has.
 
I really want to see how MS compete with steam and other PC storefront on fair grounds.
Xbox exclusive on Windows store is nice, but I don't think they can win with that alone.

The intention is more than just Xbox exclusives.

From Bill Duff, CVP & CFO, Windows and Devices Group

What I was talking about earlier was really about how do we extend that to the Windows ecosystem and the Windows 10 devices? And we are going to -- we are going to bring that content to our Windows devices. We actually launched the first launch of a Triple A game through the Windows 10 marketplace recently, Rise of the Tomb Raider. It's early. We're learning. But when you think about bringing this content to Windows and using our distribution mechanisms and our engagement mechanisms across our global customer base, we think there's a big opportunity for us to distribute third party content through our store. Gamers are a big part of any store transaction and that's a significant area of focus for us.
 
I really want to see how MS compete with steam and other PC storefront on fair grounds.
Xbox exclusive on Windows store is nice, but I don't think they can win with that alone.

It comes down to services each provides. MS still does have Xbox One owners. If you like to play games with your friends (who are on Xbox...if they are), then if a game is on Steam v. W10...most likely you'll get it on W10 to play with your friend. Steam has the advantage of the amount of games and being the #1 on PC for so long but they don't have the reach that MS will with consumers. Also, achievements...Steam has achievements but cmon...everybody knows that them Xbox cheevos is where it's at (and that's just a mindshare type of thing).

But I truly do think that the friend stuff will play a huge part because a huge amount of people have friends that play xbox than they do that have PC games. (i'm talkin IRL friends, not online PC friends). I know one thing, MS not being the top dog is always the best MS for the consumer. Ahh...I love competition.

MS has to compete against Steam, Sony, and Nintendo to try to win the PC and living room. They definitely have to go above and beyond to try to convince users it's the best thing to use their services and play their games.

Good times ahead gamers.

------------------------------------

EDIT: Also, Xbox app/One has the community that they've been trying to build. If you think about it...Xbox app and the Xbox One have a facebook-like aspect to it. Profiles, Statuses, Likes, Comments, what's trending, etc...Not saying Steam doesn't have stuff like that...but they don't have it on console as well and that's where it can hurt them for customers of the same game (some games will only go to Steam, CS, Portal, TF2, etc...) that are third party. That's why I said friends play a big part in this.
 
But there's no need to even try to block Steam at all. Unless of course I'm not understanding your definition of "block". They will just release their games on the Windows Store while you can go about your business using Steam. I mean, you'll still be able to play games from both stores in the same PC.

If they can migrate all the users of Steam to Windows Store they'll finally have an active user base for it. No doubt this is their endgame, the walled app ecosystem is $$$ and they need to jumpstart theirs badly.
 
To force users into using the Windows Store? MS wants into that walled apps gold mine bad.

Of course they won't block Steam overnight. It's got to be a gradual weaning off process.

They won't block Steam ever.

You're talking about the company run by a CEO whose first order of business was to get better versions of Office on OSX, iOS, and Android. Who now has Linux in Azure as an option and backing other open source projects like Google Kubernetes and Docker. They want more users of their products, they're not going to start running people off again with Ballmer's failed walled garden strategy, not when their new direction is working.

However, you're free to be wrong as much as you like.

WTF is this shit?

Didn't Phil praise steam a while back?

Yep:
"I think they've got a great vision," he says. "I've said it before, the work they've done on the Windows gaming side for 15, 20 years has been amazing. They've been the shepherds of that ecosystem while we've been a little bit absent. They have a great vision for where they're trying to take Steam and the whole connection, and giving away Source is a smart move. - Link

I’m a big fan of Steam, 95% of Steam games are played on Windows. At the end of day, we want to be the best at giving gamers their greatest gaming experiences as a platform, publisher or retailer. That said, we’ll obviously be shipping a Windows Store with the launch of Windows 10. We’ll make sure our first-party franchises are well assorted in our first-party store. It’s good for the store to have first-party games using our service, this will be the same for Xbox Live on Windows. The combination of first-party studios using our service and store will make us a better platform. - Link
 
Because it's funny to say that Street Fighter V not being on Xbox helps PS4 sales while at the same time saying that Quantum Break being on PC will hurt greatly Xbox sales as the former is on PC too, and the latter still isn't on any other gaming console.

On top of this, I brought up more than just Street Fighter V. I've also mentioned people who have stated that PS4 indies that are on PC too and aren't on Xbox One help PS4 sales (something that I also agree with by the way).



It's not a big difference to people who only play on consoles - i.e. the majority of console gamers.



Haha, seriously? Yep -- I'm definitely making the comparison to make myself feel better. Not to show that most console gamers still view games as exclusive if they are only on one console as many of them don't care about PC gaming to begin with.

No there's not a big difference. Sony fans saying SF5 will increase PS4 because it's console exclusive while isn't true when it comes to QB.

The whole thing is just fanboys being delusional. Sony could actually benefited from releasing The Order on PC since it disappointed critically and sales wise.

Every console exclusive should be on PC period. Sony and Nintendo should follow. It's a win for gamers. Why limit my options on where to play the games I bought?

The sales figures over the next few months will show who is right or wrong in this case. What will you say if the PS4 sees a huge increase in sales around the time that SF5 releases but Xbox One sales don't move at all around the time of QB's release?

Sony doesn't give a shit about the PC in general, that's why you will never see their 1st party games natively on the platform. They have no reason to. They shut down Vaio and are currently all in with the PlayStation brand at the moment as a company. Microsoft on the other hand have Windows 10 licences to sell. The only reason Street Fighter 5 is coming to the PC is because it's a 3rd party franchise. I doubt Capcom would have done the deal if it meant it wouldn't also get a PC release. There would be minimal benefit to Sony releasing a game like The Order on the PC. It's not like it would be free/cheap to port the game either unlike Microsoft who develop their 1st party games in direct X already.

Microsoft want to try and bring people back to the PC because their console venture is currently failing. Why do you think they are giving out the Windows 10 version of the game to all Xbox One pre orders but are not doing the same thing the other way round?
 
Give you free games if you buy them on win 10. Not really a move to block them but I would not share revenue with steam for my 1st party games.
They already do with Fable Anniversary, Kalimba, Halo: Spartan Assault, Halo: Spartan Strike, Ori, State of Decay, Max: The Curse of Brotherhood, & Cobalt.

I suppose they could have waited for Windows 10 to release these on their own other platform but they chose to release those on another competing service as well.

MS has to compete against Steam, Sony, and Nintendo to try to win the PC and living room. They definitely have to go above and beyond to try to convince users it's the best thing to use their services and play their games.

Good times ahead gamers.
I would argue that perhaps they're fighting too many fronts considering they also compete with Google and Apple.
 
We don't know the power of Xbox friends/achievement/cross buy/cross play/MS exclusive yet. Also, PC is like MS home turf, there is so much they can do to win.

If they didn't block Chrome or Itunes do you really think they'll block Steam? They've never blocked anyone in their history.
 
They already do with Fable Anniversary, Kalimba, Halo: Spartan Assault, Halo: Spartan Strike, State of Decay, Max: The Curse of Brotherhood, & Cobalt.

I suppose they could have waited for Windows 10 to release these on their own other platform but they chose to release those on another competing service as well.


I would argue that perhaps they're fighting too many fronts considering they also compete with Google and Apple.

And Amazon. Hell, they all compete with each other.
 
I agree with all said here.
As an X1 owner, I don't mind the first party stuff going to PC if it means more successful games.
Would be nice if they dropped the subscription for MP though, and just make Gold into what PS+ used to be.
Now that consoles aren't as heavy subsidized, there seems to be little excuse for keeping it.
I agree with you. I would be all in on PC gaming if I could get Sony and Nintendo exclusives there as well. The PC could be like a mall and the game publishers have competing stores which will drive prices down and be more consumer friendly than locking people into hardware and ecosystems.
 
They already do with Fable Anniversary, Kalimba, Halo: Spartan Assault, Halo: Spartan Strike, State of Decay, Max: The Curse of Brotherhood, & Cobalt.

I suppose they could have waited for Windows 10 to release these on their own other platform but they chose to release those on another competing service as well.


I would argue that perhaps they're fighting too many fronts considering they also compete with Google and Apple.


Yes, they have many people to compete with...I wouldn't say apple/Google are going to be big players in the gaming world... yet but for casuals, they got it. The living room is still a pretty core gaming front.
 
We don't know the power of Xbox friends/achievement/cross buy/cross play/MS exclusive yet. Also, PC is like MS home turf, there is so much they can do to win.

No matter how powerful the lure of Xbox is, on PC it's just another storefront.
I use Steam, GoG, Origin, even Uplay. I lose nothing by creating one more account for the Windows Store.
If they want me to "migrate over" so I stop using all those storefronts and use theirs near exclusively, their service would have to have all the best features of all of them with none of the downsides.

Not a chance in hell that's happening.
 
No matter how powerful the lure of Xbox is, on PC it's just another storefront.
I use Steam, GoG, Origin, even Uplay. I lose nothing by creating one more account for the Windows Store.
If they want me to "migrate over" so I stop using all those storefronts and use theirs near exclusively, their service would have to have all the best features of all of them with none of the downsides.

Not a chance in hell that's happening.

Actually, you don't even have to create a new acc for the windows store....it's the same as your acc on your pc :P
 
So what is MS gameplan to block Steam?

It will be failing a one, that's all I can say with any confidence. Valve has set a dead man's switch of epic proportions. The more steam is hampered on windows, the more users rub off onto other os's.
 
Remedy isn't a first party studio. It makes it more attractive for 2nd/3rd party devs like them to sign up for a Xbox One exclusive if they're also allowed to release it on PC. A straight up 2nd/3rd party exclusive is very hard to swing because of how far behind the PS4 the Xbox One is. A PC release is a way to make up the installed base numbers. I'm pretty certain this won't happen (day one at least) with first party titles.

Microsoft also has some level of ownership of the PC gaming space through Windows. Releasing Xbox exclusives through the Windows app store (and not steam) lets them push their own platform. Delayed first party games and day one 2nd/3rd party games seems like a reasonable compromise.

This makes no sense for Sony at all. They have no stake in PC gaming and don't generally need a larger install base for their games. The idea of a WWS game on PC is laughable and they already allow some 3rd party "console exclusives" to launch on PC.
 
We don't know the power of Xbox friends/achievement/cross buy/cross play/MS exclusive yet. Also, PC is like MS home turf, there is so much they can do to win.

MS doesn't have to "win" nor does Steam have to "lose". People will use what they think is best for them for a specific game. It may be price but it may be friends, it may be exclusive, who knows.
 
Actually, you don't even have to create a new acc for the windows store....it's the same as your acc on your pc :P

I use so few of W10 features that I completely forgot about that. Frankly the Windows account system is a major pain in the ass for me avoided using it as much as possible.
 
And Amazon. Hell, they all compete with each other.

Yep, Amazon too.

As far as the op goes, I think we'll see the results of the move to releasing more exclusives to PC in a few more years. If we see a higher quantity of new games come out (preferably a mix of old and new IP's) then it's good for the Xbox brand and by extension Xbox owners but if it's around the same output as now with the same issue of less indy's and 3rd party support then it wasn't that great of a benefit to Xbox fans.
 
Yep, Amazon too.

As far as the op goes, I think we'll see the results of the move to releasing more exclusives to PC in a few more years. If we see a higher quantity of new games come out (preferably a mix of old and new IP's) then it's good for the Xbox brand and by extension Xbox owners but if it's around the same output as now with the same issue of less indy's and 3rd party support then it wasn't that great of a benefit to Xbox fans.

I think you'll see a lot more Indies as the Xbox store and Windows store combine. Xbox being able to run w10 apps/games make it easier for a dev to just "build once" and distribute wherever. That's been MS goal with UWP. its just gonna start this year. I know I cant wait to dev on it.
 
Front of my mind is if Microsoft is going to clean up the app store which is currently chock full of other people's IP, web container apps [usually for someone else's website], free software being re-sold for money and other assorted garbage.
 
Yes, they have many people to compete with...I wouldn't say apple/Google are going to be big players in the gaming world... yet but for casuals, they got it. The living room is still a pretty core gaming front.
I just meant in general, they're doing surfaces, mobile phones, OS's, business and game software, music & movie services, game and PC hardware, AR equipment (Hololens). At some point they're going to have to contract again and focus on what works best for them.

I think you'll see a lot more Indies as the Xbox store and Windows store combine. Xbox being able to run w10 apps/games make it easier for a dev to just "build once" and distribute wherever. That's been MS goal with UWP. its just gonna start this year. I know I cant wait to dev on it.

I certainly hope that's the case, Xbox misses out on a lot of games that could have benefited from an easily portable OS but that's also assuming the parity clause aspect isn't the other big obstacle.
 
Front of my mind is if Microsoft is going to clean up the app store which is currently chock full of other people's IP, web container apps [usually for someone else's website], free software being re-sold for money and other assorted garbage.

Absolutely, they need to filter out the 'mainline' game releases from the other free to play mobile crap, or it will look awful. Putting Tomb Raider, Quantum Break etc besides Candy Crush Saga is moronic ..
 
I just meant in general, they're doing surfaces, mobile phones, OS's, business and game software, music, tv, game and PC hardware, AR equipment (Hololens). At some point they're going to have to contract again and focus on what works best for them.

If you put it in the context that their CEO has then all of those make perfect sense and you can understand why they won't be getting rid of any of them. He said he has three products: Azure, Windows, and Office. Everything else he called features or parts that have been realigned to support the growth of those three products.

For Windows, he said he moved all hardware, first-party game development and services, and services for music, movies, and TV to support consumer preferences for Windows. That is, those divisions now are officially rolled into the OS group, with their teams reporting to the Windows leaders. He believes there will be a growing number of screens and that people expect their experiences to go with them (mobile) across those screens, so he said they will build new hardware anytime they can showcase innovative uses of Windows experiences, including their mobility, and hopefully inspire manufactures to build Windows devices (like they did with Surface).

If you put that in contrast with what Apple or Google are doing it still seems like Microsoft is only doing just enough to attract users to the Microsoft platform.

Satya Nadella said:
I just think about three things. There are a few other efforts we do, and I’ve been very clear about those efforts and why they exist and why we are proud of them. But, there are three products in all of this. There is Windows, there is Office 365, and there is Azure. That’s it. Everything else to me is, of course, you can call them features, you can call them parts of that... - Link
 
Top Bottom