Batman V Superman’ Takes A Dive With -70% Second Weekend

Status
Not open for further replies.
Read Superman Birthright. Watch Batman Begins.

The payoff should have been in the first movie.

Nah they could have gotten away with it being in the second movie and it would be fine and make a lot of sense in the context of these films...the problem is we're waiting for the third now.
 
Thread title made me think of this:

tumblr_nky2pqdxIW1tdkro1o3_500.gif
 
I cant believe you guys got the box office thread locked :/

Where do weekend numbers for non-BvS stuff go before xaosslug posts the new thread? Here?

I guess?

It's not as if a simple "okay, enough with the avatar photoshopping, guys" wouldn't have done it. (shrug)

What were you going to post?
 
Are we really still playing the "Snyder always planned this!" card?

Really?

When literally everything about BvS was a reaction to the shitstorm of criticisms about MoS?

I mean FFS they actually have Anderson Fucking Cooper on screen to tell us that all the buildings are empty. It could not have been more 4th wall if he said right afterward:

"Please buy directors cut! It will fix everything, I swear!"
 
Read Superman Birthright. Watch Batman Begins.

The payoff should have been in the first movie. I shouldn't have to buy 3 movie tickets for the titular protagonist to become an compelling character.

I feel like the answer should always be "If you feel like you don't get a character enough, read a Mark Waid book about him/her."
 
Nah they could have gotten away with it being in the second movie and it would be fine and make a lot of sense in the context of these films...the problem is we're waiting for the third now.
I agree that he could have gotten away with it in a second movie but a good director would have done it in one. And even then I'm not saying that movie would have had to end with the perfect Superman but something a lot closer and a lot more interesting then what we got at the end of Man of Steel.

As much shit as I get for this, I think JMS did it better in his Earth One trilogy.
 
I agree that he could have gotten away with it in a second movie but a good director would have done it in one. And even then I'm not saying that movie would have had to end with the perfect Superman but something a lot closer and a lot more interesting then what we got at the end of Man of Steel.

As much shit as I get for this, I think JMS did it better in his Earth One trilogy.

I agree with you, tbh.

I can't think of an example where that advice doesn't work.

I'v never read a single book of his, even ones I didn't like, where I didn't at least feel like the characters were themselves.

Guy just gets character writing.
 
So I just finished the film:

Got to hand it to Snyder, I didn't think it was possible to make a 2.5 hour film feel both plodding and rushed at the same time, yet that is exactly what BvS is.

Every single criticism was spot on.

I do NOT understand why so many love Batfleck. He looks the part, but the script gave him NOTHING to work with

Gal Gadot was also passable at best as WW. Again, script gave her nothing.

Action scenes were nowhere near good enough to help this trash.

Eisenberg was even worse than I thought. Someone literally saw Carey in Batman Forever and said "Yeah, we need more of that!"

The ending. LMFAO at the ending.

3/10. Said score might go lower. The more I think about this shit, the angrier I get.

Supes deserves better.

Batman deserves better.

DC fans deserve better.

We all deserve better, but with Snyder, this is all we are getting.

Horrible, awful piece of shit of a movie.
 
Are we really still playing the "Snyder always planned this!" card?

Really?

When literally everything about BvS was a reaction to the shitstorm of criticisms about MoS?

I mean FFS they actually have Anderson Fucking Cooper on screen to tell us that all the buildings are empty. It could not have been more 4th wall if he said right afterward:

"Please buy directors cut! It will fix everything, I swear!"

Snyder planned everything, he knew the films would be received this way but had the GUTS and VISION to take some heat short term so he could realize this epic character arc that will retroactively make everyone realize how amazing MOS and BvS are!
 
After two films I still haven't seen much of a character arc. BvS lasts 2,5 hours with lot's of talking and managed to barely contain any character development or insight to their reasoning. The characters waste way too many time not listening to each other or just repeating their points instead.
 
Has Snyder said this? This is the arc I've assumed they're going for, but I've not had any confirmation.

IDK. I do remember someone mentioning that Snyder said during the promotion for Watchmen that one of the reasons he was drawn to that book was because he was constantly disappointed that superhero comics didn't have the heroes murdering or fucking anyone, so that ought to tell you how he's approaching this on some level...
 
Marvel has created a better Superman in Chris Evans/Captain America than DC has with the actual character. That legitimately makes me kind of sad.

Yeah, no. Captain America is filled with self-doubt in both films. The Superman analogue is Thor, a guy who believes he's doing the right thing always and believes that even his evil brother is capable of redemption. It's just that the Thor films both do a disservice to the character and ignore how great Thor being happy and an Earth-based superhero would be.
 
Yeah, no. Captain America is filled with self-doubt in both films. The Superman analogue is Thor, a guy who believes he's doing the right thing always and believes that even his evil brother is capable of redemption. It's just that the Thor films both do a disservice to the character and ignore how great Thor being happy and an Earth-based superhero would be.

You think superman never has self doubt? There isn't a laughing gif big enough for this one.
 
The sad thing is that the first trailer for Man of Steel represents everything Superman should be about. It feels serious, even a bit somber, but also dignified and full of hope. Superman shouldn't be a funny movie, but it doesn't mean it should be sad. Instead it should feel inspirational.

Still the best superhero trailer so far out of ALL of them. None of the MCU/DC/Nolan/Xmen trailers are as good as this one. I love it so much I downloaded it and save it on my PC lmao.
 
you're cherry picking. .

I'm simply demonstrating the differential between the way these cinematic universes are constructed.

Even when the chips are down in the Marvel films, the writing never conveys the sense that the heroes themselves comprehend their mortality in any way.
 
You think superman never has self doubt? There isn't a laughing gif big enough for this one.

I think people complain about Superman having self-doubt in MOS and BvS, and it's strange that they forget both Cap films have him filled with it. Yes the execution is better, but it's not like Superman done ala Cap removes part of the thing they find irritating about the character.
 
I guess?

It's not as if a simple "okay, enough with the avatar photoshopping, guys" wouldn't have done it. (shrug)

What were you going to post?

Nothing right now, but we usually get studio estimates starting around 10am (and rougher estimates before that) and the new thread doesnt go up until 12:30-1pm most weeks.

I also dont think most people in this thread are here to discuss box office numbers.
 
Ultron I get, but there was no way they were gonna put OG Mandarin on screen. Same reason why they cast Tilda Swinton as the Ancient One.

A evil Chinese business man with high tech rings is way to taboo

latest


Folks need to stop getting their comics from the 50s
 
Yeah, no. Captain America is filled with self-doubt in both films. The Superman analogue is Thor, a guy who believes he's doing the right thing always and believes that even his evil brother is capable of redemption. It's just that the Thor films both do a disservice to the character and ignore how great Thor being happy and an Earth-based superhero would be.

Saying that Superman is more like Thor is really only comparing their surface characteristics rather than getting to the heart of the characters. At heart, Cap and Superman are way more similar. And Superman has plenty of self doubt.
 
I'm simply demonstrating the differential between the way these cinematic universes are constructed.

Even when the chips are down in the Marvel films, the writing never conveys the sense that the heroes themselves comprehend their mortality in any way.

"Thor" was literally nothing but a movie about carefree invulnerable hero coming to grips with mortality (literally) and the consequences of his actions.
 
I think people complain about Superman having self-doubt in MOS and BvS, and it's strange that they forget both Cap films have him filled with it. Yes the execution is better, but it's not like Superman done ala Cap removes part of the thing they find irritating about the character.

I find Snyder Superman irritating because he's a charisma-less stone golem with zero character agency.
 
Saying that Superman is more like Thor is really only comparing their surface characteristics rather than getting to the heart of the characters. At heart, Cap and Superman are way more similar. And Superman has plenty of self doubt.

Really?

I'd say Thor and Superman share a lot. Both sent to Earth by their father, both Gods on a planet of humans, both consider Earth their home planet, both bond with the first Earth women they encounter, and both believe in the good of humanity despite every possible logic
 
A evil Chinese business man with high tech rings is way to taboo

latest


Folks need to stop getting their comics from the 50s
Even modern Mandarin would probably be a risk for Marvel. The Dark Knight got banned in China entirely for that scene where Batman takes out Lau's goons.
 
A evil Chinese business man with high tech rings is way to taboo

latest


Folks need to stop getting their comics from the 50s

Bruh I get it that he's not a green guy with a Fu Manchu going "Hohoho Iron Man is twapped in my cwutches!" anymore

But China is the biggest INTL market and well.
 
I'm simply demonstrating the differential between the way these cinematic universes are constructed.

Even when the chips are down in the Marvel films, the writing never conveys the sense that the heroes themselves comprehend their mortality in any way.

"You are my mission"
"Then finish it, 'cause I'm with you 'til the end of the line"


That's his second movie by the way. In the first one he actually killed himself to save the world.

But sure, whatever you say.
 
I'm simply demonstrating the differential between the way these cinematic universes are constructed.

Even when the chips are down in the Marvel films, the writing never conveys the sense that the heroes themselves comprehend their mortality in any way.

What about when Tony Stark went through a hole in space and then blacked out believing he was about to die which consequently led to PTSD being a recurring issue over two separate movies? Or Cap accepting death over fighting his friend in a movie that deals heavily with survivor's guilt? Or Rocket wailing like a baby because he thought Groot just died? Or Thor standing up to the Destroyer knowing he'd be surely killed? Ya know, most MCU films deal directly with the hero confronting their own mortality when you stop to think about it.
 
Really?

I'd say Thor and Superman share a lot. Both sent to Earth by their father, both Gods on a planet of humans, both consider Earth their home planet, both bond with the first Earth women they encounter, and both believe in the good of humanity despite every possible logic

That's still surface level stuff. Superman is still the story of a man wanting to be a part of the world, while Thor is about how humans still matter even when they seem small compared to the vastness of say, Asgard. Superman has the secret identity, the relationship with his parents and the Daily Planet. Thor has the Viking lore and backdrop.
 
Really?

I'd say Thor and Superman share a lot. Both sent to Earth by their father, both Gods on a planet of humans, both consider Earth their home planet, both bond with the first Earth women they encounter, and both believe in the good of humanity despite every possible logic

Again most of the things you are bringing up are surface characteristics and not their true character. We're talking about their core, their essence, not their backstory.

To put it one simple way that is easy to understand, if Thor and Superman switched bodies you would notice a difference pretty quick in spite of them both being good dudes. If Thor and Cap switched bodies, it could go on for a while before anyone noticed.

Please don't take that example beyond it's intended demonstration and start getting into nitty gritty details like thor's speech patterns.
 
"Thor" was literally nothing but a movie about carefree invulnerable hero coming to grips with mortality (literally) and the consequences of his actions.

giphy.gif


so you've got nothing? good to know.

What's to say? You're clearly a rabid Marvel Fan who believes the MCU filmmakers can do no wrong, and are beyond censure.

You handwaved away my original comparison with some garbage about it being 'appropriate' to lighten the mood, even though the film was full of jokes already, power posted a bunch of generalized assertions, and then wilfully misinterpret mortality with regard to how I'm using it.

If you can't play straight, don't expect to be indulged.
 
Yeah, no. Captain America is filled with self-doubt in both films. The Superman analogue is Thor, a guy who believes he's doing the right thing always and believes that even his evil brother is capable of redemption. It's just that the Thor films both do a disservice to the character and ignore how great Thor being happy and an Earth-based superhero would be.
Self-doubt that he eventually get's over when he realizes people depend on him. In the end, Cap is a simply a good man with unshakable ideals. Even without his powers/super serum or his costume, he's just inspiring to the people around him. You can see it in their faces--the look Maria Hill gives him during his speech in Winter Soldier. Even when finding out he essentially died for nothing, he doesn't dwell, he doesn't look inward. It affects him yes, but he doesn't mope for the next hour of the movie.
 
That's still surface level stuff. Superman is still the story of a man wanting to be a part of the world, while Thor is about how humans still matter even when they seem small compared to the vastness of say, Asgard. Superman has the secret identity, the relationship with his parents and the Daily Planet. Thor has the Viking lore and backdrop.

The films change a lot about Thor to be fair. Some of the Donald Blake stuff would actually work great in the films and mitigate a lot of their problems.
 
MCU Captain America is a better Superman than Snyderman.

There, I said it.

Cap is really one of the best done in MCU. Except I don't care about him and Peggy.

And I don't care about him and his friendship with Bucky.

besides that he was good in TWS and AOU I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom