Should Sony Release PS4 Exclusives on the PC 3 to 4 Years After Release?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If PC gamers never got to experience games like Demon's Souls or Bloodborne, that would really be a shame. Those games are sooo good. My Souls collection wouldn't feel complete without them, much less the little piece of me that would feel like it's missing if I hadn't played them. Maybe there's a petition you could sign.
 
I don't think Sony has to. They are in a good enough position not to be concerned about anything other than insuring the Neo's success.
 
PS1, PS2, and PSP aren't necessary cuz of emulation though.

PS3 maybe in a couple years. Its emulator is making slow but steady progress.

Wait I just took a stroll through the Fallout 4 console mod thread. Putting games on platforms against the intent of the creators? I'm pretty sure PC gamers are against that now.
 
You think that walled gardens are pro-consumer?

I'm not blaming Sony for doing what they do because it is what's best for business.

But I'm not going to lie to other consumers and tell them that less options is actually good for them.

You're literally doing Sony's PR work for them.

Walled gardens can be pro consumer. Like a warranty that there's no malware, and a single place where all developers must go to offer their applications which means competition which drives the price down.
 
MS has at least tried. Sony on the other hand, hasn't at all. Again, to be clear, I understand the rationale behind both console owners maintaining console exclusive games. But it's the hypocrisy of taking one to task and not the other.

Again, Sony doesn't have a Windows type Platform that it can do that with, and never has Sony taken the task to promise any type of PC committment like Microsoft has. If they did, then sure, give them flak all you want....but Sony never promised to head in that direction and as such, they are right to not receive any flak for that.
 
If PC gamers never got to experience games like Demon's Souls or Bloodborne, that would really be a shame. Those games are sooo good. My Souls collection wouldn't feel complete without them, much less the little piece of me that would feel like it's missing if I hadn't played them. Maybe there's a petition you could sign.
There is a petition for every game for PC.

https://www.change.org/p/bandai-nam...tware-sony-please-release-demon-s-souls-on-pc

The bloodborne one even managed almost 50k signatures.

https://www.change.org/p/from-software-release-bloodborne-for-the-personalized-computing-platform
 
I'm arguing the ecosystem is a means-to-an-end - much like MS have done with XBox and Winstore.

Now, yeah, there's reasons against my point of view. But there's also reasons for it (imho).

(just when I leave, they pull me back in! :D )

(Anyway, I really am kinda-scared I'll get perma-banned, so I am actually out now. And we're all going round in circles anyways)

It makes sense for MS because Windows is a tent-pole of their overall business and is in perfect synergy with PC gaming...sort of.

This is not the case for Sony. Whilst it would be great for PC gamers to have their cake and eat it too, Sony has very little to gain from that strategy.
 
PS Now will eventually do this, on any TV, PC, mobile devices, and other Sony consoles.

I'm talking about years from now and I'm only following what they said during the PS4 reveal.
Of course they won't add current gen to the service until a new console comes out because they sell hardware and that's their business but if a new console comes out, PS4 games will probably be added to it at some point.

You just gotta pay a fee.
 
Should? Sure why not. Those of us that are fine with $1000 upgrades every month and uncomfy chair gaming still get to play games we're interested in. Why would people be upset if PC gamers got to play God of War Ascension?

Will they? Never. Nintendo will go third party before Sony ever brings their real titles to PC.
 
As a pc gamer, while it'd be nice to pay the handful of exclusives that I want to play on consoles, it seems like it'd be a rather silly business proposition unless someone can show me the numbers would work.

It's a nice to have for the content; I'd love to play the horizon/last guardian/splatoon/Mario karts of the world. But console hardware is worthless for me otherwise. Can't really rationalize why a business would do that given my self-serving perspective.
 
If you venture outside of GAF and GameFAQs you'll quickly see that the PC platform is pretty much the go-to for most gaming discussions communities out there, especially reddit and 4chan. It doesn't really surprise me that there's been a rise in threads like these. An entire zeitgeist raised on steam sales and >90% of major titles seeing an eventual steam release couldn't be expected to act much differently.

But yeah, "catalog-begging", I like that term. It really captures the weird memetic aspect of how PC fanboys internalize certain attitudes w/r/t that don't come up in console fanbases. So much gets thrown around about "open platform" and "anti-consumer" and whatnot that it starts to be applied in weird ways to justify - convincingly in the eyes of the complainer, I'm pretty sure - what's actually just plain port-begging that wouldn't benefit the would-be porting company financially the way they seem to think.

Anyways, I've run my mouth ITT way too much as it is, gonna leave it at that.



And that.

Well said. This is the absolute truth of the matter.
 
No, I want to stop people enjoying games. Unless of course they are prepared to hand money over to my preferred corporate overlord.
 
Should? Sure why not. Those of us that are fine with $1000 upgrades every month and uncomfy chair gaming still get to play games we're interested in. Why would people be upset if PC gamers got to play God of War Ascension?

Will they? Never. Nintendo will go third party before Sony ever brings their real titles to PC.

Idiot fanboys might get upset but you'll find that most of the people in this thread are arguing that it doesn't make any sense for Sony to make this move.
 
Niiiiiiice. :p

Tell me, if I buy a second-hand PS4 and a second-hand game, and I ignore the PSN ecosystem, what revenue does Sony gain?

Yes, there are other issues at work with businesses, but I wasn't talking about them. I was talking explicitly about revenue. :)
You're a single example. No one cares about you in the greater scheme of things.

All revenue is not created equal. If revenue is gotten at the cost of cannibalizing other revenue sources, that's a fairly shit revenue source.
 
I don't think 3-4 years later would really impact the console sales that much, largely because no one is really not buying a Playstation based on the idea that they can maybe play these upcoming exclusives on PC in 2020.

But I also don't know how many copies of 4 year old PC ports they would sell, and there is money / work involved in making ports.

I don't see them ever doing this, it just doesn't seem all that profitable.
 
Idiot fanboys might get upset but you'll find that most of the people in this thread are arguing that it doesn't make any sense for Sony to make this move.
I mean, not only for Sony, it still doesn't make much sense for us as consumers.

This is the same issue with Nintendo. If Nintendo loses their hardware business and licensing fees or if Sony loses their PS+ subscriptions and licensing fees, they're going to lose a significant chunk of their income, cutting into their ability to make the games that people are so ravenously begging for in the first place. How the hell is that good for anyone?

I really don't think people understand the business side of this industry at all.
 
If this was legit their strategy - porting 4 year old games to PC - I can't see how the revenue they make from this is of any interest to Sony whatsoever. Take Dragons Dogma as an example - Capcom was happy with the sales but I doubt the money this made from them is enough to offset the loss of subscriptions and royalties Sony would experience from making similar moves with their own software. If it is it would be so small as to be irrelevant considering the effort in establishing yourself in the PC market. That money would probably better invested elsewhere.

It's all well and good pointing at titles like Trails and Danganronpa as well, but Sony likely isn't interested in this kind of money. They make smaller titles for PlayStation to create variety in their library and develop relationships with devs, not purely for the profit.

The only way Sony games make it to PC on any regular basis is if they make their own storefront. I can see this happening but it's more of a 10 years down the line thing, not immediate. I also think that the variety and strength of their titles (especially this gen) would be an attractive incentive to use such a store over Steam for a lot of people - more than Ubisoft, Microsoft and EA at least. Of course this assumes it is fully functioning and featured, not some barebones shit show.
 
No, I want to stop people enjoying games. Unless of course they are prepared to hand money over to my preferred corporate overlord.

Maybe you should spend less time sharpening that internet edge and more time learning how businesses work.
 
I thought the biggest reason why console exist, is that most of the consumer would never get into the "hassle" of PC gaming? Would never abandon their "trophies" and "friendlists"

So what is it, really?

a) majority of console gamer would never buy a PC so a Company like sony can only win if they port their games to a userbase that has no overlap with their own hardware-userbase. So they could make easy money.

or

b) the userbase that would never go into PC gaming is in the minority and Sony has to fear a shrinking console market if they port their first party games
 
MS has at least tried. Sony on the other hand, hasn't at all. Again, to be clear, I understand the rationale behind both console owners maintaining console exclusive games. But it's the hypocrisy of taking one to task and not the other.

MS is already established in the PC space.
It would be a big risk for Sony to do the same. And one not worth taking.
 
No, I want to stop people enjoying games. Unless of course they are prepared to hand money over to my preferred corporate overlord.

Yes, people arent currently enjoying games, they're just pretending, they should instead be giving their money to your preferred corporate overlords.

There is plenty of games on PC for gamers to enjoys already, please stop.
 
If PC gamers never got to experience games like Demon's Souls or Bloodborne, that would really be a shame. Those games are sooo good. My Souls collection wouldn't feel complete without them, much less the little piece of me that would feel like it's missing if I hadn't played them. Maybe there's a petition you could sign.

Or, you know, just get one of those consoles that play those games later in the gen when they are cheap?
 
I thought the biggest reason why console exist, is that most of the consumer would never get into the "hassle" of PC gaming? Would never abandon their "trophies" and "friendlists"

So what is it, really?

a) majority of console gamer would never buy a PC so a Company like sony can only win if they port their games to a userbase that has no overlap with their own hardware-userbase. So they could make easy money.

or

b) the userbase that would never go into PC gaming is in the minority and Sony has to fear a shrinking console market if they port their first party games
The reactions to the Xbox/Windows 10 announcement makes me think it is the latter instead of the former.
 
MS is already established in the PC space.
It would be a big risk for Sony to do the same. And one not worth taking.

As I said, I wish they did, but understand why they don't. From a business perspective there's not much they win and risk losing a lot. My only observation is how some people can't understand MS when they do the same. Personally I don't care as I own all the platforms. I applaud MS for their play anywhere initiative.

Which then get people saying "well what's the point of buying an Xbox One" then. They can't seemingly do right whatever they do.
 
No, I want to stop people enjoying games. Unless of course they are prepared to hand money over to my preferred corporate overlord.

It's really amazing how you all couldn't stop talking about exclusive this and exclusive that at the beginning of the gen but now that MS has switched it up its no longer about exclusive games.

What I don't get is why don't people ever call for their preferred corporate overlord to release their games on competing consoles and ecosystems. The port begging usually only goes one way,
 
The reactions to the Xbox/Windows 10 announcement makes me think it is the latter instead of the former.

I would say the opposite. Unless you feel that a significant portion of the PS4 userbase would drop PS hardware for PCs that cost two or three times as much, along with all the added complexity and the lack of good living room solutions. That has never been the case, historically. Consoles have always been about value and convenience. That doesn't change in a hypothetical world where Sony sells games on PC.
 
It would be nice for the sake of preservation, but I don't ever see it happening, especially with how popular remasters have become.



Some people get really touchy when you talk about taking away their exclusives.

What preservation is necessary?

Maybe tons of decades later, when today's systems have all but rotted away, we can start talking about preservation, but right now it's not a necessity. Even then, they could just host it on a Sony Network that doesn't include the PC space at a later date. No Steamfront store type thing needed.
 
Sony are really doing things right atm with their exclusives because friends of mine who are exclusively PC gamers are coming out with the same talk as the OP. It'll never happen though.
 
It doesn't make sense. Sony's current strategy makes sense and that's why they are dominating the consoles market now.

Sony should release their games on PC only after Microsoft and Valve publish their games on PlayStation.Because if their games are released in PC too it wouldn't make sense to buy their consoles.

Microsoft is doing it because they are exiting the console market and shiting their assets to PC.

A movement that makes sense for MS due to the loses that the console adventure generated for them over the years, but not for Sony, who made a profit from consoles and now are leading that market.
 
If you venture outside of GAF and GameFAQs you'll quickly see that the PC platform is pretty much the go-to for most gaming discussions communities out there, especially reddit and 4chan. It doesn't really surprise me that there's been a rise in threads like these. An entire zeitgeist raised on steam sales and >90% of major titles seeing an eventual steam release couldn't be expected to act much differently.

But yeah, "catalog-begging", I like that term. It really captures the weird memetic aspect of how PC fanboys internalize certain attitudes w/r/t that don't come up in console fanbases. So much gets thrown around about "open platform" and "anti-consumer" and whatnot that it starts to be applied in weird ways to justify - convincingly in the eyes of the complainer, I'm pretty sure - what's actually just plain port-begging that wouldn't benefit the would-be porting company financially the way they seem to think.

Anyways, I've run my mouth ITT way too much as it is, gonna leave it at that.



And that.

Well said
 
Today? No.
Tomorrow? No
In the future? Yes.

Sony didn't acquire Gaikai and Onlive for millions of dollars for nothing. The patents, tech, infrastructure and talent is being accumulated for a reason. The endgame forPlaystation is as a future Netflix-style subscription service. Basically PS Now is the future of Playstation as soo as evolved fiber and internet speeds enable stable and lossless streaming. Then, every Smart-TV, Tablet, Laptop, Mac, PC, Smartphone, Blu-ray player, Apple-TV, Rokku and Playstation will become a Playstation. Netflix proved that this is the model, especially since Apple is headed towards the same direction.

Also, forget about counting Tflops and jiglyboops in the future, as every single Playstation-streaming server-rooms would be upgraded with the newest CPU's and GPU's yearly.
 
I would say the opposite. Unless you feel that a significant portion of the PS4 userbase would drop PS hardware for PCs that cost two or three times as much, along with all the added complexity and the lack of good living room solutions. That has never been the case, historically. Consoles have always been about value and convenience. That doesn't change in a hypothetical world where Sony sells games on PC.
Oh... you have no idea the reaction on GAF would be if that was the case. I have seen so many people a. sell their console b. drop their plans altogether after hearing that every Xbox exclusive is making its way to PC. I saw tons of similar reactions on Twitter/Facebook/NeoGAF. I have seen it first hand with a friend who completely sold his Xbox One now because he just lost all appeal for it after this announcement. He is planning to build his own PC now and will keep it along with his PS4. He is also planning for an NX because of the 'exclusive' Zelda.

One of the reason my friend lost interest was because he has no interest in playing these games on a weak hardware. He is willing to upgrade to Neo if there are benefits and he could have upgraded to Scorpio if there were actual Xbox exclusives left, but PC is the better option here since it offers the better value while offering the best experience for him.

My friend would drop PS4 in an instant if the exclusives were to be announced for PC. Wouldn't this hurt Sony? Going back and reading some of the replies, there are also plenty of other users here who think the same. So this move spells nothing but reduced attractiveness of their hardware.
 
PC gamers are used to buying games for cheap. I don't think anyone wants 3-4yr old Sony games at $60.

PC gamers don't even want new W10 games on PC apparently judging by how lackluster sales have been.
That probably doesn't give Sony much confidence even if they are considering a similar strategy.
 
AyaisMUsikWhore said:
history will tell you that PC gaming benefited more from Consoles than Consoles ever did PC.

Uh not even you believe this. Literally everything a console can do has been done before on PC, years ahead of time. Consoles have become more and more like PC's and copying the things they can do to the point that the "convenience" argument for them is losing more and more relevance.
 
Should Sony Release PS4 Exclusives on the PC 3 to 4 Years After Release?

No they should not. Sony has to sell 'PlayStation' to the people. They're a console company like Nintendo. They're developing stuff so that people know "you will get this only on PlayStation". And not "wait a few years and you can play it elsewhere".
 
No, exclusivity is the only way any console has value anymore.

And don't give me the xbox excuse.

The only reason they are doing it is because they probably won't have another console after Scorpio.
 
Sony (and Nintendo) won't see any of my money unless they port their games to PC. I'm done with multiple gaming platforms in my household.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom