So Orlando Bloom and Katy Perry are trending on Twitter...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Euphor!a

Banned
I'm being serious. You honestly think it is immoral under all circumstances to take a picture of someone in a public place without their permission?

No, you're trying to create some pedantic argument. If someone in public is holding the disarm codes for a nuclear weapon that is located in an orphanage, feel free to take a picture of it without judgement.
 

Aselith

Member
No, you're trying to create some pedantic argument. If someone in public is holding the disarm codes for a nuclear weapon that is located in an orphanage, feel free to take a picture of it without judgement.

That seems immoral because you aren't trying to stop the person
 

Krammy

Member
He looks like a shower and not a grower, although he might just have a semi. Either way, I came into this thread expecting to be blown away and I left sort of eh.

Also :lol at people asking where the foreskin is. It's clear as day.
 

Euphor!a

Banned
That seems immoral because you aren't trying to stop the person

Well presumably that's why you're taking the picture, but if you are saving them for after the bomb goes off and then sharing them with your reddit bros, yeah that is kinda immoral.
 
lol people are acting like Orlando Bloom is some kind of victim.

I'm sure he's devastated that everyone saw him frolicking around paradise with Katy Perry and his big uncircumcised weiner.

How will he cope with the shame?
 

Euphor!a

Banned
lol people are acting like Orlando Bloom is some kind of victim.

I'm sure he's devastated that everyone saw him frolicking around paradise with Katy Perry and his big uncircumcised weiner.

How will he cope with the shame?

You can say the same about literally any celebrity that has had naked pictures taken or leaked without their permission.
 
Sotc_boxart.jpg
 
Why?

Why would you... what.

Is this one of those weird things artists do because they are creative and free creatures of this earth or some hippie shit like that?
 

Volimar

Member
again, are you guys actually making the argument that a man and woman who have nude photos released are facing the same potential level of fallout?

No, they're arguing that it's the same level of fucked up to do it to a man as it is to do it to a woman.
 
again, are you guys actually making the argument that a man and woman who have nude photos released are facing the same potential level of fallout?

I feels to me like it's more acceptable to admire the guy's physical fitness and well endowed nature and confidence.

If katy was topless people would think she must be so ashamed and it would be treated shameful to be attracted to her and want to see the photos.

As long as this was well out of view of any children or families it's not so bad.
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
again, are you guys actually making the argument that a man and woman who have nude photos released are facing the same potential level of fallout?

The issue is consent, not gender.
 
No, they're arguing that it's the same level of fucked up to do it to a man as it is to do it to a woman.


It's not the same level of fucked up because we live in a society where men can rely on getting a pass for this sort of thing and women can't rely on getting a pass.
 

Aselith

Member
I'm a men's rights advocate because I'm acknowledging that we live in an unfair patriarchal society that favors men?

You made no argument just made a sarcastic comment that it's different because it's a man which doesn't make sense considering that people are arguing it's different because you don't have an expectation of privacy in public.

Unless you were being sarcastic with one end of the sentence and serious with the other, your comment doesn't make a lot sense considering that the poster you are responding to is arguing they are both exactly the same fappening and this.

That's why it seemed like an MRA comment because it seemed like what people who were making points about the difference here were saying through the filter of that group.

So were you serious that it's different because it's a man or do you really think that it's the same as fappening stuff when you're in public because you were being sarcastic about both OR did you switch tones in the middle of a sentence?
 

Slaythe

Member
39 and he's in great shape. Looking at the pics from last year, it's amazing what going on a cut can do for you.


He gets paid millions, he has access to the best coach, food, gyms on earth, his job is literally giving him all the time in the world to get in shape.

How hard is it if it's a goal of yours, with all that, really ?
 
And yet, still fine.


A crime was actually committed against her and it is pretty telling that you are unable see her as a victim.

Orlando Bloom chose to hang out in public with his penis exposed, and as far as I am aware no crime was committed against him.
 

Euphor!a

Banned
A crime was actually committed against her and it is pretty telling that you are unable see her as a victim.

Orlando Bloom chose to hang out in public with his penis exposed, and as far as I am aware no crime was committed against him.

Just because she was a victim doesn't mean she isn't fine.

Pretty telling you are unable to see that. Actually the whole "it's different because he is a man" bit is pretty telling that you are not worth talking to.
 
He gets paid millions, he has access to the best coach, food, gyms on earth, his job is literally giving him all the time in the world to get in shape.

How hard is it if it's a goal of yours, with all that, really ?

Eh, I'm 34, and I look pretty damn good thanks to dedication to the gym and eating right.

But I still agree with your points.
 

Altairre

Member
I never mentioned cosplay and have no idea what you are talking about.

He's referring to cosplayers because you shouldn't take pictures of them without asking for permission. I don't think it's illegal to do so though some conventions started putting up signs because of it.
 
He's referring to cosplayers because you shouldn't take pictures of them without asking for permission. I don't think it's illegal to do so though some conventions started putting up signs because of it.


Conventions are usually held in privately owned buildings and they can make whatever rules they want.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom