Emperor_Uriel
Member
Really hoping it's all a setup and the mystery girl is a new villain. Pearl is at her best when her emotions are being curbstomped.
While I'm a big fan of PearlxRose and RubyxSapphire, I can see how people might be a little tired of the lack of a real heterosexual romance in the series. GregxRose was in the past (and is largely still shrouded in an air of tragic mystery), Steven and Connie are kids, and the less said about LarsxSadie, the better. From a truly progressive standpoint, the fact that the show seems to shy away from showing a truly equal, emotionally positive, adult heterosexual relationship is troubling.
The show could be doing a lot more to encourage the (likely quite substantial) audience of young straight girls to express themselves in ways that combat traditional gender norms. Instead, it could be seen as reinforcing the notion that all non-traditional women are lesbians. "Let's make all the cool women gay" isn't as progressive as, say, "let's have a balance of cool gay and straight women." The latter is the only truly progressive, feminist path.
The moment you see the mystery girl, with her fierce hair, piercings, and empowered, masculine style, the traditional assumption is that she's going to be a lesbian. Instead of combating that negative stereotype, SU doubles-down on it, which is quite unfortunate.
I don't know what they expected from a show made an artistic, nerdy, bisexual woman with a short hair cut and a distinctly progressive view on sexuality.
While I'm a big fan of PearlxRose and RubyxSapphire, I can see how people might be a little tired of the lack of a real heterosexual romance in the series. GregxRose was in the past (and is largely still shrouded in an air of tragic mystery), Steven and Connie are kids, and the less said about LarsxSadie, the better. From a truly progressive standpoint, the fact that the show seems to shy away from showing a truly equal, emotionally positive, adult heterosexual relationship is troubling.
The show could be doing a lot more to encourage the (likely quite substantial) audience of young straight girls to express themselves in ways that combat traditional gender norms. Instead, it could be seen as reinforcing the notion that all non-traditional women are lesbians. "Let's make all the cool women gay" isn't as progressive as, say, "let's have a balance of cool gay and straight women." The latter is the only truly progressive, feminist path.
The moment you see the mystery girl, with her fierce hair, piercings, and empowered, masculine style, the traditional assumption is that she's going to be a lesbian. Instead of combating that negative stereotype, SU doubles-down on it, which is quite unfortunate.