(with exception to doom) never a good sign :/
not touching till post launch, got it.
Well, it's never a good sign. Doom just shows it's not an absolute indicator that the game is trash, but it still has to lower your level of confidence.
(with exception to doom) never a good sign :/
not touching till post launch, got it.
Well, it's never a good sign. Doom just shows it's not an absolute indicator that the game is trash, but it still has to lower your level of confidence.
![]()
I'm hoping the game itself is good, regardless of the technical issues.
![]()
I'm hoping the game itself is good, regardless of the technical issues.
![]()
I'm hoping the game itself is good, regardless of the technical issues.
That chair closest to Lincoln be like:
For fuck sake, an explosion? Alright, alright human you go, me follow.
I can't stop laughing at that gif
Well, yes. I would tell you that too if I had to choose either one in a you-must-choose scenario, because only one of those options prevents from being potentially burned. At the end of the day everyone has to decide for themselves but in my mind - at this point - it can't really be argued that the subject of this thread isn't a bad look in one way or another.To me it seems that opposite is going on, people care too much that someone else pre-ordered the game. So people are bringing up the plentiful gameplay footage available that has brought them confidence in the game. I've seen more posts that say "people shouldn't preorder this" than "people really should pre-order this!" Haven't you? Even the OP tells people to not pre-order games.
It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
Thanks for chiming in. Our opinions on open world games usually gel, so the fact that you're enjoying it gives me hope.It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
Err, isn't piracy with AAA games pretty much dead still?
I've only focused on missions, so I'm not sure. But there are icons on the map that indicate the locations of bars, strip clubs and stores. Don't how interactive these are, but there are icons.Does the city have more to offer than just window dressing like in Mafia 2? That was really my biggest complaint of Mafia 2. Mafia 2 had awesome graphics, great music, fantastic atmosphere, a good story and a huge city with nothing to do in it.
Thanks, Joe.It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
I cancelled my pre-order because of this thread, I can just buy it later when the price goes down and I have more than enough games to play anyway
What were your impressions of Mafia 2?It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
Thanks for the impressions joe. I'm mainly in it for the story.It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
Which effects?I watched a preview from Gamestar and they said you can't turn the post effects off. They said it'll probably going to divide the community of people that'll hate that and people who will like that because it fits the game. The journalists said it takes time to get used to.
I watched a preview from Gamestar and they said you can't turn the post effects off. They said it'll probably going to divide the community of people that'll hate that and people who will like that because it fits the game. The journalists said it takes time to get used to.
Yeah, they played it on PC.Even on PC? I'm sure someone will figure it out if so.
Which effects?
Yeah, they played it on PC.
I am sure there will be mods.
They didn't specify. The colour grading was too muted for their tasted and it made the game look not that great.What post-processing effects they were talking about?
They didn't specify. The colour grading was too muted for their tasted and it made the game look not that great.
Yeah, there's a muted look, a lack of overall sharpness. But I'm not sure whether you can change that in the advanced settings. My demo pc had everything turned all the way up, so I'd guess it's the look of the game. But that's something that needs to be tested.They didn't specify. The colour grading was too muted for their tasted and it made the game look not that great.
It's fine. And worth your money from what I've played.
Just in side missions OtherJoe and I were having ridiculous amounts of fun, just as in GTAV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zDnuZ2OUBA
There's a danger of slight repetition when taking down rackets, as you have to cause X amount of monetary damage before a "boss" will come out to end that mission to take over a district but so far all the main line missions have either been pretty entertaining or slow intentionally for atmosphere.
I've no idea why they wouldn't give review copies to the "Big Guys" like IGN and Gamespot, maybe they felt bad since they didnt give them to the smaller outlets and went for parity?
The feeling I get was that it's just 2K being EXTREMELY paranoid and overprotective about Pirated Copies since its a high value triple AAA single player game that 2K has very high hopes for. They had the game on mobile PS4's under 2 layers of lock and key when they were traveling around to various outlets who couldn't make it to their HQ.
Is it as good as GTAV?
I can't tell from only 4 hours played but I can say there's no way this game is "bad" and posting buggy funny gif's is just as easy as with GTAV, so that's no real indicator, hell those things are in our opinion good for the game as it makes for funny videos! (as long as those bugs are infrequent as they seemed to be)
After playing it we felt it was a pretty easy buy in our minds, but can only say for sure after a full review.
I estimate that outlets will give it between 8-9's, maybe one or two 7's on the low end. Im sure the press will dock it for no multiplayer since they will compare it so closely to GTAV.
Games with release day embargoes don't always turn out badly, but unless there's a legitimate reason for it, such as large online components, then it does often indicate a lack of confidence in the product on the part of the publisher. I've been looking forward to this game for a while, and it certainly concerns me in this case.
I don't give a shit about whether or not a review or no review in advance of a video game means, red flag, high beams, or whatever other stupid little term people can come up with...
If you can't watch the ten plus hours of Gameplay already seen in videos and not make a damn choice as to whether or not you are buying a videogame this might not be the hobby for you...
Let's see I like open world games-I will buy it 95 percent of the time-check
It's a time period/city in an open world game that hasn't been done much
-1968 Louisiana-Check
I can roam around districts, all varied, go where i want and do what i want, i can slow walk around town, I can drive cars, punch npcs, carry bodies, shoot npcs, have car chases with the police-Check
But mommy I have to wait for a review because my favorite gaming outlet didnt tell me if its good....
By far the most striking part of Mafia III is how slick and engaging its narrative scenes are. Cut scenes in action games are often something you want to be over as soon as possible, but I found myself actually looking forward to the 2-5 minute vignettes that bookended each bout of action.
Five hours wasn't nearly enough to pass judgment on Mafia III, and its worth noting that after the initial two hour prologue, we were jumped ahead 15 hours to give us a taste of the late-game content.
I don't give a shit about whether or not a review or no review in advance of a video game means, red flag, high beams, or whatever other stupid little term people can come up with...
If you can't watch the ten plus hours of Gameplay already seen in videos and not make a damn choice as to whether or not you are buying a videogame this might not be the hobby for you...
Let's see I like open world games-I will buy it 95 percent of the time-check
It's a time period/city in an open world game that hasn't been done much
-1968 Louisiana-Check
I can roam around districts, all varied, go where i want and do what i want, i can slow walk around town, I can drive cars, punch npcs, carry bodies, shoot npcs, have car chases with the police-Check
But mommy I have to wait for a review because my favorite gaming outlet didnt tell me if its good....
Pleased to hear the story is good. It's what Mafia is known for, after all.
I think even if there is repetitive elements, the story should carry the game.