Sony Gamescom 2010 Press Conference

Scotch said:
Well I wasn't expecting much so I can't say this was a letdown, but man do I have little excitement for Sony's first party lineup. The only thing they have is sequels to games that weren't that amazing in the first place. I really wish they'd come up with some new IP's.

May I ask which games you are refering to? Because I found the games these games are sequals to pretty amazing except R2 which still was alright IMO.
 
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?
 
Im serious about this..

Where is my CROSS GAME CHAT? Also WHERE is the Software emulated PS2 (It can be done and should be placed on Playstation PLus) for those who wan't it..

I will than be happy until than these are great games but the system i still incomplete!
 
J-Rzez said:
I expected this to be unveiled today honestly. WTF is going on over there?
Lightbox is a small start-up dev, Sony already had an ace (Insomniac) for GC 2010. Let Jobe and crew announce Starhawk when it's ready, more polish is always good, especially for a reveal.
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?

Which one, the only does squeals posters?.:lol
 
There is some revisionist history going on here, Resistance 2 was not a bad game, it's just that Resistance 1 was a very good launch title and Resistance 2 never really built on it. I remember enjoying playing R2 but thinking it lacked some of the charm od R1, at no point did I think it was a bad game, not even close. I guess it might not be cool to say that nowadays but that's how I see it.

I am pretty sure a lot of the people saying the Resistance is a dead franchise have probably not played all the games. Retribution proved that as a franchise it can get back in the right direction.
 
apart from the Move and PSN games we had no new IP announcements from Sony for quite some time now :/

I'm happy with the all those games coming but still I need something fresh to mix it up.
 
Stumpokapow said:
Very similar target audience to Twisted Metal, so I expect them to give them both a little space between each other

That's the only thing I was thinking. But even still. I think they can both co-exist. They have to show it off sometime though. As they've both been in the works now for a while, so they both will probably release within a year of each other perhaps. I hope they don't relegate "Starhawk" to being unveiled in a Game Informer magazine. :(
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?

and... playstation move games like the shoot, fight, and this other stuff are sequels too?
 
Seems like every non-Japanese PS3 first party game is getting a sequel except for Uncharted (2) and MAG.
 
J-Rzez said:
You must hate gaming then. It's all sequels with a couple new titles thrown in there. And that's on consoles, pc, and mobile devices. Go skip rocks on a lake instead, you'll be hard pressed to find the same rock twice.
We've gone from "PS3 haz no gaems" to "PS3 haz too many sequells!"
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?

Maybe but still unrealistic expectations. So many new IPs have been created this gen and of course they are going to use them. Anything else would be foolish. There still going to be new IPs but if you want more wait for the next gen.

And why did my PS3 die last weekend? That move bundle is so attractive.
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?

Yeah the Only does comment made it a more direct attack.
 
Bojanglez said:
There is some revisionist history going on here, Resistance 2 was not a bad game, it's just that Resistance 1 was a very good launch title and Resistance 2 never really built on it. I remember enjoying playing R2 but thinking it lacked some of the charm od R1, at no point did I think it was a bad game, not even close. I guess it might not be cool to say that nowadays but that's how I see it.

I am pretty sure a lot of the people saying the Resistance is a dead franchise have probably not played all the games. Retribution proved that as a franchise it can get back in the right direction.

R1 was fucking fantastic and you couldnt get what it was offering on any other console at the time. I loved that game and played it many many hours on my jpn imported ps3 sans blood if im not mistken.:lol
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?

He should make a thread about it then. Then again, there isn't much point. Complaining about sequels in popular media makes about as much sense as complaining about the weather.
 
Rapping Granny said:
Why the fuck are people excited for R3? R2 was complete shit, R1 was an average launch title.

Pretty much sum up everything I feel about the series and Insomniac as a whole.
People always give them the benefit of the doubt.

Had Resistance 1 not the exclusive launch title that was heavily marketed, I don't think the series would ever fly beyond other second or third tier FPS like FEAR or Metro 2033. If you think about it, the series really doesn't have much stand out among the competition, other being a 1st party title.

What I really want from Insomniac is a new mascot platformer/shooter with brand new mechanic. That's what they do best.
 
seady said:
Pretty much sum up everything I feel about the series and Insomniac as a whole.
People always give them the benefit of the doubt.

Had Resistance 1 not the exclusive launch title that was heavily marketed, I don't think the series would ever fly beyond other second or third tier FPS like FEAR or Metro 2033. If you think about it, the series really doesn't have much stand out among the competition, other being a 1st party title.

The only first tier fps game is Half Life. So being second-third tier is a given for most fps games..
 
radicalchris said:
PS3 only does

Sequels

We've been playing the same games now for years!

motorstorm
infamous
socom
killzone
Resistance
Ratchet and clank

All but 2 of those are new IP, not to mention Last Guardian, Heavy Rain, etc.
 
ram said:
and... playstation move games like the shoot, fight, and this other stuff are sequels too?

I'd argue that all three first-party platforms have had a dearth of new content for the last few years and the new content they have had have largely been lower tier stuff, more suitable to one-offs than strong IPs. I would not consider any of the move launch IP to be strongly branded; in terms of gameplay content, a few (such as Kung Fu Rider) seem novel enough and could count.

Sony did start off the generation strong, though, with Sucker Punch doing new IP, Naughty Dog doing new IP, investing in a few outside new IPs, and launching with a new Insomniac IP. Warhawk, as well, despite not strictly being new, was definitely a refreshing mix of an old abandoned IP with a new type of gameplay.

I don't want to dive into a pissing match about what games count as new and what don't, I just wanted to point out that there's no need to call someone a console warrior until they've actually outed themselves as such.

Boombloxer said:
All but 2 of those are new IP, not to mention Last Guardian, Heavy Rain, etc.

I think by new IP, it's generally implied to mean "new IP" not "IP that's been new since the beginning of the generation"
 
seady said:
Pretty much sum up everything I feel about the series and Insomniac as a whole.
People always give them the benefit of the doubt.

Had Resistance 1 not the exclusive launch title that was heavily marketed, I don't think the series would ever fly beyond other second or third tier FPS like FEAR or Metro 2033. If you think about it, the series really doesn't have much stand out among the competition, other being a 1st party title.
Pretty accurate I think.

I always cringe at the tight development cycle argument which often arises. Yeah, they can make a functional middle of the road game in a short period of time, that to me is not a great thing. They aren't charging the user less, they're just selling them a mediocre game for the cost of a good one.

I think they're probably the most overrated development house outside of Nintendo.
 
GeoramA said:
We've gone from "PS3 haz no gaems" to "PS3 haz too many sequells!"

and you can guarantee that if they made a load of new IPs people would be complaining that they have ditched their beloved franchise X. They can't win, if people don't like sequels don't buy them. I am sure new IPs will come but Sony have to get in money making mode for a while in order to justify it, as long as they don't drive their IPs into the ground I am not that concerned.
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?
I totally imagined a guy posting in green beret fatigues now, thanks :lol
 
radicalchris said:
PS3 only does

Sequels

We've been playing the same games now for years!

motorstorm
infamous
socom
killzone
Resistance
Ratchet and clank

Three (half) of those are new, original franchises that started this generation. I'd call this a pretty great mix. Maybe it's a bit shooter heavy, but if you complain about these games, let me know which console manufacturer did better new ip wise this generation.
 
Yep I leave for 15 minutes and they show Resistance 3. I really like the way inFamous 2 looks. The opening shot with the foliage looks pretty good.
 
Bojanglez said:
and you can guarantee that if they made a load of new IPs people would be complaining that they have ditched their beloved franchise X.

But the complaints wouldn't be from the same people. Some people want lots of sequels, some people want lots of new IP, some people claim to want new IP but only buy sequels, some people want everything, some people are just trolling.

Saying that some people would make the opposite complaint doesn't confirm or dismiss a complaint.

Momo said:
I totally imagined a guy posting in green beret fatigues now, thanks :lol

I want to say that's not accurate, but some posters are pretty... weird.
 
Stumpokapow said:
Did you guys not consider that the guy complaining about sequels might actually just be fed up with sequels, rather than being a secret Microsoft commando sent to infiltrate this thread and hate on Sony?

Then he should have made a comment about the videogame industry in general instead of making the "only does" joke that's usually made to satirize specifically PS3.
 
Had Halo 1 not the exclusive launch title that was heavily marketed, I don't think the series would ever fly beyond other second or third tier FPS like FEAR or Metro 2033. If you think about it, the series really doesn't have much stand out among the competition, other being a 1st party title.

Look the same thing applies for other titles as well.
 
El-Suave said:
Three (half) of those are new, original franchises that started this generation. I'd call this a pretty great mix. Maybe it's a bit shooter heavy, but if you complain about these games, let me know which console manufacturer did better new ip wise this generation.

Too many shooters.

Can't wait for TGS.
 
DMeisterJ said:
I'm pissed we still have no news on 'HD Classics'... Come on now Sony.

Yeah, give me SotC/Ico HD and a promise that all this move crap will keep to its side of the playing field and I'll buy a PS3 tomorrow damnit.
 
fortified_concept said:
Then he should have made a comment about the videogame industry in general instead of making the "only does" joke that's usually made to satirize specifically PS3.

Err, it's in a Sony thread, so I'm pretty sure he's allowed to skewer Sony in specific while not excluding that the viewpoint holds true for the other platforms. Especially with a posting record of literally one post, I'd think people would withhold hasty judgment.
 
GT5
The Last Guardian
LBP2
Killzone 3
InFamous 2
MotorStorm Apocalypse
Twisted Metal
Resistance 3
Ratchet & Clank All 4 One

Damn Sony, ok, take my money.
 
Sequels are often loved because it usually means a direct iteration, so usually gameplay/UI improvements. New IPs are often loved because they bring new ideas and experiences, but often fall short in terms of gameplay promise, there are exceptions in both cases of course, but I'd say generally that's fair, and those things are going to excite different people. Not everyone who rips on sequels is a console warrior, a great deal of people really don't give a fuck about platforms.
 
Lard said:
Can't wait for TGS.
Yep, can't wait for Keiji Inafune to say how Japan has lost it and Kojima to whine about how Japan isn't what it's used to be anymore while Yoichi Wada announces yet more cellphone development.

:lol
 
I wonder if anyone got a copyright out on having points pop up when you kill people in fps games. If they did then today make them a sackful of money.
 
54-46! said:
Wait.. people actually like Resistance? :lol

Yes yes yes!!! Resistance 1's single player was friggin ace, Resistance 2's Co-op had me hooked for months. Now that they had a while to reflect I'm hoping they merge the best of both games, and add even more awesomeness to the 3rd. There's so much potential and that trailer makes it seem like the scary is back, and I'm sure they aren't going to do the 2 weapons only thing again. Also I hope that resistance 1 health system is back, it made the game more tense.

moe_1.gif


Ratchet A4One
I love this type of game. I bet it's like a action rpg. You know, like gaunlet, Baulder's Gate Dark Alliance, and Marvel's Ultimate Alliance (not sure if you gain abilities in that game). I'm sure the players will get exp like other ratchet games, and gadgets. This game is right up my alley as well. With their experience from Resistance 2 Co op I bet there will be a lot of tech tree like stuff going on in this game. I'm hyped for both.

<3 you Insomniac, and I await your new IP game, I'm sure it will be amazing as well. Best dev crew to me this gen. So much gaming sugar, as Kevin Butler would say. I bet Insomniac has a van full of candy.
 
kyo_daikun said:
Xbox 360 only does
Sequels is a stupid argument, if you get a fanbase for a game you build on it, you don't just decide to make new ip's ALL the time.
your argument is a stupid argument. No one is asking for new ip's ALL the time...only SOME of the time. See Alan Wake and Heavy Rain.
 
El-Suave said:
Three (half) of those are new, original franchises that started this generation. I'd call this a pretty great mix. Maybe it's a bit shooter heavy, but if you complain about these games, let me know which console manufacturer did better new ip wise this generation.

The only actual shooters with the traditional sense of the word are Killzone and Resistance. Imo putting a tactical game like Socom, a sandbox and a platformer in that category is like putting FF and Soul Calibur together in the category of "sword games".
 
Chakan said:
GT5
The Last Guardian
LBP2
Killzone 3
InFamous 2
MotorStorm Apocalypse
Twisted Metal
Resistance 3
Ratchet & Clank All 4 One

Damn Sony, ok, take my money.

Shit I am buying every game on that list. Thank god for overtime bonuses. :lol
 
Top Bottom