Polygon: COD WWII’s ‘diversity’ is nothing more than marketing

Skatterd

Member
I am not going to dig up scenarios that are everywhere on the daily. This article is just another example of it. There are calls for diversity and that is all well and good, but there is also a hateful ant-white sentiment that is out there as well. Sorry you have not noticed.

"'When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression "
 

ironcreed

Banned
You sure like to spout off about anti-white this and that a lot. Do you have a hard time differentiating calls for inclusivity with imaginary reverse-racism? Has someone from ANTIFA punched you in the face recently?

Also..



Sorry, but no. If you're going to make statements like the ones you're making, but cant be bothered to "dig up scenarios that are everywhere on the daily" then don't make fucking statements like that. Don't even bring it to the table if you can't source it.

Here we are in a topic that is a perfect example, yet I guess it must be my imagination. But thanks for including ANTIFA as another example. Pretty hateful bunch.
 

dubq

Member
Here we are in a topic that is a perfect example, yet I guess it must be my imagination. But thanks for including ANTIFA as another example. Pretty hateful bunch.

☑ doesn't understand inclusivity
☑ believes in anti-white reverse-racism
☑ opposes the anti-fascist movement
☑ won't source their own arguments

Enjoy your day, friendo. We're done here.
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
Someone explain Polygon's business model please.

I'm not a reader of the site, but based on what gets filtered through here, the business model is to put moral degenerates in the digital stocks and encourage others to join in the pillorying.
 

Timurse

Banned
Sorry didn't have time to scroll for 10 pages.

Has someone already post this pic about how diversive and inclusive Polygon itself is?

The groups are ranged by numbers: white men, white women, a man of color, women of color.

8GMw9m0.jpg

source: https://twitter.com/retropcan/status/857508643578802176
 

dubq

Member
My life has been anything but privileged, but thanks for assuming just because I am white that it must be so!

Addendum..

☑ completely misunderstands the meaning of "white privilege"
☑ doesn't understand inclusivity
☑ believes in anti-white reverse-racism
☑ opposes the anti-fascist movement
☑ won't source their own arguments
 

ironcreed

Banned
☑ doesn't understand inclusivity
☑ believes in anti-white reverse-racism
☑ opposes the anti-fascist movement
☑ won't source their own arguments

Enjoy your day, friendo. We're done here.

Nice checklist of assumptions that does not describe me at all. Let me guess, I am a racist?

At any rate, yes we are done. As I am done with NeoGAF. It has been on a downward spiral for years now with this virtue signaling radical bullshit that is all about being inclusive only for people who think the exact same way, and I know that I am not the only one to see it. This place is a far cry from what it used to be and it's sad to see. It's been real, folks.
 

Nepenthe

Member
My life has been anything but privileged, but thanks for assuming just because I am white that it must be so!

That is exactly what it means. If you are white, it means whatever socioeconomic situation you are in is statistically and socially better than that same situation for a non-white person.

You could be broke as fuck. But you don't have to be black in an anti-black world on top of it.

Edit: Of course you're leaving. Of course.
 

Fliesen

Member
My man ironcreed worried about the real problem at hand here.

White genocide.

If you have a hard timing emphasising with certain ethnicities being the victim of systemic oppression.
Make up the scenario that your ethnicity is starting to be oppressed.
image.php
 

wildfire

Banned
Nice checklist of assumptions that does not describe me at all. Let me guess, I am a racist?

At any rate, yes we are done. As I am done with NeoGAF. It has been on a downward spiral for years now with this virtue signaling radical bullshit that is all about being inclusive only for people who think the exact same way, and I know that I am not the only one to see it. This place is a far cry from what it used to be and it's sad to see. It's been real, folks.



You make 14 posts on average per day. You won't stay away no more than 2 days.

When you come back keep in mind the privilege you have comes from inherently being white.

You may not be able to leverage it as easily as others but it will always be available to you while inaccessible for non-whites.
 

Llyranor

Member
Article is bullshit but let's examine the non-white contributions in WW2

So, we've got the european powers (not including dominions) - Britain, France, Germany/Austria, Russian, Finland, Italy, various others - pretty much all white although I dare say Britain may have had the odd black or brown face.

Then there are the Turks, who span a number races given their location. Then there are the Arabs in North Africa, then there are Britain's Indian troops and the Gurkhas (from Nepal).

Then we have China and Japan, obviously 100% non-white.

The ANZACs - would they include soldiers from indigenous groups? I have no idea.

And then there is the US and Canada, The US in particular had segregated black troops as recognised in this game and in Battlefield One.

edit: Did Britain have any (sub-Saharan) African troops?

Did I get anything wrong or miss anyone out (almost certainly I did).

In games, I guess the biggest omission is Chinese, Indian and Gurkha representation although I don't claim to have played every WW2 game so I'm not sure. I'd love to play a Gurkha mission though.

And don't forget the French colonial troops!

(And the Maori as someone else mentioned)
 
Nice checklist of assumptions that does not describe me at all. Let me guess, I am a racist?

At any rate, yes we are done. As I am done with NeoGAF. It has been on a downward spiral for years now with this virtue signaling radical bullshit that is all about being inclusive only for people who think the exact same way, and I know that I am not the only one to see it. This place is a far cry from what it used to be and it's sad to see. It's been real, folks.

You won't be missed.
 

TalonJH

Member
guess they just tried to make people click on their article without being responsiblity from what they published. what a shame. It's just blind blame without solid fact.

btw, if you do research enough, there IS all kind of peoples in this game. it's not white-wash/racist

The article is the opposite of what you think it is. It's saying that there is diversity but it's there to sell to people that like diversity. It's calling their inclusion of a diverse cast a money grab.

On topic: ...So Polygon somehow took the dumb conservative minority shoehorning argument and mixed it with a dumb liberal purity test.

Are they trying to make everyone mad and just get angry clicks?

In all honesty, I don't care if it's done for money. Diversity is good and the better the content of that diversity the happier I am. I don't care about their motivation for including it as long as they do a good job.
 
Polygon is genius

edit:
also this topic is already a total fuck up as every political one these days on neogaf or the whole internet
 

SomTervo

Member
Nice checklist of assumptions that does not describe me at all. Let me guess, I am a racist?

At any rate, yes we are done. As I am done with NeoGAF. It has been on a downward spiral for years now with this virtue signaling radical bullshit that is all about being inclusive only for people who think the exact same way, and I know that I am not the only one to see it. This place is a far cry from what it used to be and it's sad to see. It's been real, folks.

Wow.

You make 14 posts on average per day. You won't stay away no more than 2 days.

When you come back keep in mind the privilege you have comes from inherently being white.

You may not be able to leverage it as easily as others but it will always be available to you while inaccessible for non-whites.

Perfectly said. I'm white and not from a very "privileged" background either but white privilege and how that affects me positively and non-whites negatively is blatant.
 
Neither will you. Now kindly go fuck yourself.

Jeez, chill the heckout. Take a step back, edit your posts and think about what you've been writing for the past two pages. Actually think about what people are telling you. They're not out to get you. You're completely missing their points.

There's legit no need to go out with a 'bang' to try and be a edge-lord or hero of some sort. You'll regret it soon enough and lurk GAF for months with hatred building up inside of you, as do most banned people here. The poster you've replied to has countered your points in the discussion, and you resort to this? What sort of credibility does it give your argument?
 

RionaaM

Unconfirmed Member
Well that was quick. How was your 90 second vacation from NeoGaf? You must feel refreshed and ready to resume your role as spokesperson for white privelage! Such bravery!
Oh well, at least he was kind. Unlike all these anti-white people who are everywhere (even though I can't quote one single example, but don't let the truth get in the way of my beliefs!)


(this post is sarcastic, of course, just in case it wasn't clear)
 
Whoa. I came in here to discuss the article and it looks like a totally different conversation going on.

At any rate, while the "all white male production" may not be correct, the blurbs that have dropped about this game do feel a little "checkboxy". Like, I'd love to be proven wrong, but the part that made me sit back and laugh was the blurb about how they're being extra careful to differentiate between the german army and nazi ideology, because not all germans were nazis.

Okay, sure, that makes sense, alt-right nazi shit is on the rise, gotta make sure that's settled. But that only makes sense if there's any narrative stakes for an axis character, and as far as we know, the only time anyone plays anything related to the axis powers it's just multiplayer. Like, who gives a shit about the inner turmoil between country and ideology when you're just picking your axis loadout? This isn't The Witcher, it's COD MP. If there were axis vignettes in the SP campaign that would be a totally different conversation, but it doesn't sound like that's the case at all.
 
I dunno. I feel like it's a commonly held misconception that all members of the Wehrmacht were Nazis. People will often refer the German army simply as 'The Nazis'. The distinction may not mean much to you but it might if your grandfather was a German army conscript.
 

llien

Banned
☑ doesn't understand inclusivity
☑ believes in anti-white reverse-racism
☑ opposes the anti-fascist movement
☑ won't source their own arguments

Enjoy your day, friendo. We're done here.


Sorry, I'm new here, but I probably don't understand inclusivity either (is it spelled correctly?) I am happy to hear about it though, if people could do that without labeling me as, something.

I do believe anti-<any group of people> is wrong (it doesn't matter which word is used to describe it), anti-<some ideas> can be good or bad or in between, it depends. (for me of course)
 

Nepenthe

Member
Like, I'd love to be proven wrong, but the part that made me sit back and laugh was the blurb about how they're being extra careful to differentiate between the german army and nazi ideology, because not all germans were nazis.

Okay, sure, that makes sense, alt-right nazi shit is on the rise, gotta make sure that's settled. But that only makes sense if there's any narrative stakes for an axis character, and as far as we know, the only time anyone plays anything related to the axis powers it's just multiplayer.

To be fair, we don't know the full extent of casting either in terms of main characters or NPCs. It could be that they want to make an effort to show the effects of the war through the introduction of minor German NPCs who aren't of the Nazi regime but nonetheless get caught up in the mess. Who knows? I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt!

Sorry, I'm new here, but I probably don't understand inclusivity (is it spelled correctly?) I am happy to hear about it though, if people could do that without labeling me as, something.

I do believe anti-<any group of people> is wrong (it doesn't matter which word is used to describe it).

Inclusiveness just means including characters that aren't straight white men.
 
Whoa. I came in here to discuss the article and it looks like a totally different conversation going on.

At any rate, while the "all white male production" may not be correct, the blurbs that have dropped about this game do feel a little "checkboxy". Like, I'd love to be proven wrong, but the part that made me sit back and laugh was the blurb about how they're being extra careful to differentiate between the german army and nazi ideology, because not all germans were nazis.

Okay, sure, that makes sense, alt-right nazi shit is on the rise, gotta make sure that's settled. But that only makes sense if there's any narrative stakes for an axis character, and as far as we know, the only time anyone plays anything related to the axis powers it's just multiplayer. Like, who gives a shit about the inner turmoil between country and ideology when you're just picking your axis loadout? This isn't The Witcher, it's COD MP. If there were axis vignettes in the SP campaign that would be a totally different conversation, but it doesn't sound like that's the case at all.

As a German, I actually appreciate that. I see your point in the second paragraph, but on a surface level I appreciate their sentiment, cash grab motivation or not.
 
I'm sure someone's mentioned that Polygon is nearly all white, upper-middle class, majority male. I'd guarantee that they're less diverse than Sledgehammer and most big development teams.

As for the "Debate" they're bringing up ... Is a game called Call of Duty checkboxy, why, yes, it is. Call of Duty is the prime example of a produce-by-numbers, big time publication checkbox game. Everything is a checkbox for major published AAA titles. Is there a scene where the player loses all his guns? Yes. Is there a major battle sequence with QTEs and stuff you can't control but it looks cool? Yes. Is there a part where a grenade drops near you and in the chaos you lose all of your hearing? Yes. Is that followed up by a scene where your hearing comes back in a piecing whistle and then everything gets loud and sweary again? Yes. Are there inspirational quotes from world leaders before or after each mission? Yes. Check, check, check. 10, 15 years ago, though, there were no checkboxes for race, gender, or creed. Today there are.
 

llien

Banned
Inclusiveness just means including characters that aren't straight white men.

But I can imagine quite many types of characters that are not straight white men. (and I can't recall a game that didn't include women, or did you mean as protagonists?)

And shouldn't it depend on the context? I mean, say someone creates a game about raise of Zulu empire. Would not it make sense for that game to only include characters of African origin?

PS
I need to go offline, but will carefully read all answers tomorrow. Thank you in advance.
 

Kintaro

Worships the porcelain goddess
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=234855727&postcount=240

We can assume a studio that looks like this would put their own spin of WW2 in a positive direction.

These are people my age, not old white dudes. They seem to be fully aware of these types of things, so i think a benefit of a doubt is in order.

That is fine. However the trailer released for this game features none of the diversity talked about. The biggest piece of media for the game right now. That is all I was saying. We will hopefully see it all in the end but right now? That trailer does not show it.
 
Nice checklist of assumptions that does not describe me at all. Let me guess, I am a racist?

At any rate, yes we are done. As I am done with NeoGAF. It has been on a downward spiral for years now with this virtue signaling radical bullshit that is all about being inclusive only for people who think the exact same way, and I know that I am not the only one to see it. This place is a far cry from what it used to be and it's sad to see. It's been real, folks.

Why is it people who get a little criticism just run the hell away without explaining themselves properly or sourcing their anti-white persecution complex?
Neither will you. Now kindly go fuck yourself.

Oh wait, it just got nasty.

74343-Tombstone-well-bye-gif-hji0.gif
 
To be fair, we don't know the full extent of casting either in terms of main characters or NPCs. It could be that they want to make an effort to show the effects of the war through the introduction of minor German NPCs who aren't of the Nazi regime but nonetheless get caught up in the mess. Who knows? I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt!

Personally I would love for this to happen. I just don't think that it will, based on what we know. I think the idea is for players to have avatars for their headquarters mode that are of the Axis faction and to have some justification for it.

As a German, I actually appreciate that. I see your point in the second paragraph, but on a surface level I appreciate their sentiment, cash grab motivation or not.

I mean I like the motivation, too. I'm American, but I would agree that WWII is a subject that requires far more care and nuance in gaming than it's received so far. I guess my thought is that I wish it could be more than it sounds like it will be. Like, the sentiment is great, but if it's just a marketing blurb and they don't actually do anything with it, which is what I think will happen, it's almost worse because of the squandered potential.
 
Even if it is true that it's all marketing, so what? Including more than just white men because you want people's money isn't a bad thing, is how you eventually get to including more than just white men because that's the normal thing to do.
 
Top Bottom