gaming_noob
Member
Writing is on the wall. Can't wait to play Last of Us 2 on my PC. Don't believe Sony's latest damage control. It's coming.
At least someone else who's been paying attention.Hermen reiterated the strategy about reaching out to PC users to introduce them to PlayStation , but obviously future PlayStation titles won't be day and date with PC, but they're open to bringing more. However, there may be day and date cross-platform (PS5/PC) titles for multiplayer games. IIRC something Shawn Layden mentioned it before
Ah. Promotional video? Okay.![]()
You know you're pathetic when the producer of the game quotes you and bashes you
Some people are just pathetic, very pathetic. Stop taking fucking plastic seriously!!
Hermen reiterated the strategy about reaching out to PC users to introduce them to PlayStation , but obviously future PlayStation titles won't be day and date with PC, but they're open to bringing more. However, there may be day and date cross-platform (PS5/PC) titles for multiplayer games. IIRC something Shawn Layden mentioned it before
Hermen reiterated the strategy about reaching out to PC users to introduce them to PlayStation , but obviously future PlayStation titles won't be day and date with PC, but they're open to bringing more. However, there may be day and date cross-platform (PS5/PC) titles for multiplayer games. IIRC something Shawn Layden mentioned it before
Agreed. This is exactly how I read the message as well.At least someone else who's been paying attention.
I don't see this as a bad thing, nor is it a sign that Sony is going to do what MS is doing.
One of the first examples of it is Predator: Hunting Grounds.
At least someone else who's been paying attention.
I don't see this as a bad thing, nor is it a sign that Sony is going to do what MS is doing.
OT, but MmDreamQueen has 360+K followers, so acting like those 1500 sales are a sign of a flop is a stretch.I can totally see that in a couple of years all PS5 exclusive games will come day one to PC.
It's free money, why not? And it's only a handful of games. And these games are freaking expensive.
How many years has Dreams been in development? 5 years? And then lower than 1500 copies sold in Japan at the beginning.
You really can't justify the costs with this.
But releasing them on PS5 and PC will help to justify the costs for those games.
I would buy Bloodborne PC on day 1. Nice to see Sony dipping their toes in publishing their titles later on PC. It's not like someone's gonna wait 4 years for a title to come to PC. If they want to play, they'll buy it near release. Otherwise they could just as well wait until it can be emulated on PC.
Nothing against casuals, but combat system in general, really shine at hardest difficulty.This is like saying you are not a real cinema fan if you enjoy Marvel movies. Let people play the game in normal, is an average difficulty and there is no need to play on harder levels for being a non-casual gamer. Also, if someone is casual, there is nothing wrong with that.
The game mechanichs should be interesting enough without playing on hard.
No doubt Dreams will be the next Sony game going to PC. I think there was even a rumour about it.I can totally see that in a couple of years all PS5 exclusive games will come day one to PC.
It's free money, why not? And it's only a handful of games. And these games are freaking expensive.
How many years has Dreams been in development? 5 years? And then lower than 1500 copies sold in Japan at the beginning.
You really can't justify the costs with this.
But releasing them on PS5 and PC will help to justify the costs for those games.
He said the difference is overrated.Which is true regarding what the average gamer prefers and buys. You post is more hilarious, because you didn't even read what he wrote.Even Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder could see the difference between those framerate differences. I can't take that guy serious. His posts are rather hilarious though.
This is easy to say when "the average gamer" is either not given the choice or is offered 30fps games (with a couple of games targeting 60) on consoles... and for all we know those who have the most friends here are those who say 30fps is fine (at least there are not that many who say we cannot see more than 24/30fps anymore).He said the difference is overated.Which is true regarding what the average gamer prefers and buys. You post is more hilarious, because you didn't even read what he wrote.
It's true, if we look at sales, 3rd party multi games are in all platforms the biggest portion of total sales. Games like CoD, GTA, FIFA, Minecraft, Fortnite have a bigger impact than the exclusive ones, specially compared to the ones that aren't the top selling exclusives.I don't think exclusives are a key selling point. Top selling games on PS4 aren't exclusives: GTA, RDR, FIFA, Call of Duty, etc. A lot of people barely buy about 10 games per generation. If I look at my friends and mates, most of them don't have any interest at exclusives, they buy the PS4 so they can play the new Fallout, the new Call of Duty, ... Also, some friends love racing games and they play Project Cars or Asetto Corsa. About Drive Club or Gran Turismo? Totally ignored...
When you sell over 100 million consoles, most of the users aren't like the ones here at neogaf or other forums. A lot of consumers just want easy life, turn on the console and play. Doesn't matter if the PC is a better platform.
I quote myself.This is easy to say when "the average gamer" is either not given the choice or is offered 30fps games (with a couple of games targeting 60) on consoles... and for all we know those who have the most friends here are those who say 30fps is fine (at least there are not that many who say we cannot see more than 24/30fps anymore).
This adds to my point.
If average gamers really cared about 60fps they would not be out there like 90% 30fps games. They don't somehow force people to buy them.
60 fps could be the norm for decades now if it was an actual selling point for the companies which now prefer 30fps.
He said the difference is overrated.Which is true regarding what the average gamer prefers and buys. You post is more hilarious, because you didn't even read what he wrote.
Also the 60/120 difference is a joke for the most gamers out there. Neogaf and internet is not the reference.
PS. Stop laughing at posts you can't have an answer. It's not funny any more.
Jokes on nobody, but you man. Playing games at 30fps and under must have negative side effects, if you can't see the difference between 60 and 120fps. Why would next gen consoles even support those framerates if they're undetectable to the human eye? Don't you think that is strange, to say the least? Or you're just mad PC games will be playing Sony's entire catalog of exclusives this generation, at higher framerates, resolution, and quality?He said the difference is overated.Which is true regarding what the average gamer prefers and buys. You post is more hilarious, because you didn't even read what he wrote.
Also the 60/120 difference is a joke for the most gamers out there. Neogaf and internet is not the reference.
It's no evidence that most multiplatform games sell way more on consoles(their 30fps version) than the pc versions?People throwing around "the average gamer" or "most gamers" are full of "no evidence" and are even "less funny".
Vfx also hinted at this awhile ago but most warriors were too busy bashing the dude.
Seem like exclusives probably will be a thing of the past and stream/subscription services will be leading next gen.
Jokes on nobody, but you man. Playing games at 30fps and under must have negative side effects, if you can't see the difference between 60 and 120fps. Why would next gen consoles even support those framerates if they're undetectable to the human eye? Don't you think that is strange, to say the least? Or you're just mad PC games will be playing Sony's entire catalog of exclusives this generation, at higher framerates, resolution, and quality?
When you play games at a minimum of 100+ fps, dropping down to 60 is very noticeable. It's extremely obvious, like driving 120mph, vs 60mph. Big difference.You are in the minority if you see huge differences in 60 vs 120.
Stop pretending to yourself that neogaf/internet bubble means something, and stop ....the ad hominem.
If I am mad, imagine how you feel right now you can't play them for 30 years. Either way nobody says that entire library will come to pc. This is your wishful thinking. I imagine will start again the petitions.
You know it's a big issue when even a game dev gets involved.Not surprising. Im sure this is the norm for these guys. Guys have meltdowns on here over rumors so just imagine what this announcement did for most of the champs here.
When you play games at a minimum of 100+ fps, dropping down to 60 is very noticeable. It's extremely obvious, like driving 120mph, vs 60mph. Big difference.
As expected
I don't see PC elitists threatening to boycott a game because it's releasing on console.I think that pc elitists are the worst in industry. By far.
This is not an elitism at all. It's ''stubitism.'' lolI don't see PC elitists threatening to boycott a game because it's releasing on console.
Lol. Who would actually believe someone would be this pissed at this?
I think this is the same guy who posted a video crying MLB was going multiplat (and his friends are giggling in the background)???? I think someone said it's the same guy.
That's BS.I think that pc elitists are the worst in industry. By far.
Every now and then you can see posts of them to demonstrate some kind of supernatural superiority. You don't? Here, Era, everywhereThat's BS.
In every game warring thread, how often do you see a PC gamer with a good rig spoil the party among console peons?
doesn't happen often. At least not on gaf or Resetera.
maybe on some PC gaming centric forums everyone brags about who has the best gpu but not around here
Lol. Who would actually believe someone would be this pissed at this?
It's no evidence that most multiplatform games sell way more on consoles(their 30fps version) than the pc versions?
Yeah im done. Just threw my playstation 4 and my TV out of the window. Fuck this i dont even want to live anymore now after they pulled this...seriously this is BS.
So that means that most gamers prefer 30fps. Yeah, please explain - in depth, how you came to that entirely plausible conclusion.
It started when someone said that 30vs60 is overrated in general. And I agreed. I never said the bold.The point is that average gamers don't care as much as we believe they do.
And by average I don't mean to downplay them. Maybe they are playing more games and know more about games than we do, but we are active in forums. And we have the '''oneframemoreisbettervirus''.
Ya but when someone spends a whopping $300 on box that is probably 90% plastic and 10% microchips, don't you think they deserve exclusive video games vs. a PC gamer who can spend $1000+ getting a 3 year old port?Can you imagine getting upset that more people get to play a videogame?
Jesus Christ.