Wonder if they have new supplier and design all together for cooling solution as they took measures last year to decrease Copper heatsink imprint, wonder if they have shrunk the board itself and form factor itself is changing? Maybe no liquid metal?
What country?
Mine from 2020 launch are working perfectly.
Hopefully you can get it! Stock is getting better and smaller european countreis might start to get more units. Hopefully the same happens where i live (Portugal).
Oh i pre-ordered it day one and got one back in 2020. My country doesn't care for pre-ordering these things so i was lucky and got one with no problem. But my friends never pre-ordered and thought i was being paranoid about it selling out...and here we are in 2022 and they are still trying to get one so i keep trying to help them. Jim Ryan is focusing on countries where Xbox sells some units, so most folks in europe getting PS5 are from the UK basically, which means smaller countries like yours and mine get some left over units...so i know your pain.
Hope you score one!
Both have such crisp image quality and silky smooth framerates. You will be in for a treat when you do!
The PS5 Pro won't be a totally new architecture if that's what people are hoping for. PS5 Pro won't be drastically better than PS5 (if it even is a reality). For those looking for a better hardware SKU, they'll have to wait till PS6.
If the PS5 Pro is a thing, I see no reason why it won't be drastically better over the regular PS5. Otherwise what would be the point? The PS4 Pro was significantly faster then the regular PS4 after all.
Nah, it wasn't significantly faster. It only allowed a small step up in resolution by increasing clock speeds with an added price tag $100 more. Nothing even remotely in the vein of extra graphics features like a different GPU. We have to keep things in perspective. A Pro is only assumed on these boards because last gen had one but no other gen had a "Pro" model. That's because Sony/MS undershot power designs. This generation isn't underpowered like last gen was. Secondly, there will not be a change in architecture with a GPU. So people should stop expecting a pre-PS6 console with faster RT or hardware AI cores. I'd just expect something in the way of increased clocks and/or larger storage with overall architecture being the same to justify a $100 increase.
It was significantly faster though and did include architectural changes. The GPU was 2.3 times as faster in pure numbers and it included several new features from Polaris and Vega such as double FP16 compute and DCC.
Perhaps they had that already in the pipe because they knew their original SKU was underpowered. Nevertheless, it wasn't enough to make a difference in added visual features.
You need more than upping clocks in order to gain any traction with RT, native 4k resolution, and AI ML needed for handling RT.
Not going to be enough to make a difference in gaming other than possibly approaching 4k native.
30% increased bandwidth will of course help with RT. If they can include Infinity cache then that is a help as well.
Just please stop with that. With DLSS, FSR, CBR and Dynamic resolutions native 4K means nothing even on PC. And DLSS is not "native" either. And you don't need AI ML for RT, is that your new "moved goals" for PS5 Pro, PS6?
People are still arguing with VFX about playstation? Come on, you should know better by now,Just please stop with that. With DLSS, FSR, CBR and Dynamic resolutions native 4K means nothing even on PC. And DLSS is not "native" either. And you don't need AI ML for RT, is that your new "moved goals" for PS5 Pro, PS6?
"It has no AI ML so it has no real RT"
Doubling the GPU compute units is a change in architecture. They did NOT do that last gen at all. They didn't touch the board design GPU.
Are you trying to go on record like most of the console warriors here implying that there is no more requirement to advance GPU performance because the games that are out are underutilizing the hardware? Please say you aren't in that camp. I have yet to see any game on the console running at native 4k/60FPS with any sort of heavy duty RT - which would be a sound argument if there is proof of such a game. How much GPU design you think would be needed to make the Matrix demo run from 1080p/30FPS to native 4k/60FPS? Certainly not a PS5 Pro.
Previous generations aren't a guarantee of future requirements. Have you ever heard of this before when buying stocks that are risky? "Past performance is no guarantee of future performance". Why do a lot of you guys think requirements, costs, design, etc.. are completely 100% linear in time? I don't understand this logic.
I speak of native 4k because that tells you how good the bandwidth on a GPU is. I'm not saying that DLSS isn't doing anything to remedy the low bandwidth of Nvidia GPUs. For the 1000th time, even Nvidia boards lack bandwidth for RT and have to resort to DLSS as well. However, there will be a time that the latest GPUs boards WILL have enough bandwidth and will run a lot of these games today at native 4k/60FPS without using DLSS.Just please stop with that. With DLSS, FSR, CBR and Dynamic resolutions native 4K means nothing even on PC. And DLSS is not "native" either. And you don't need AI ML for RT, is that your new "moved goals" for PS5 Pro, PS6?
"It has no AI ML so it has no real RT"
That's exactly what they did, please at least do some research if you are going to debate a point.
Are you trying to go on record like most of the console warriors here implying that there is no more requirement to advance GPU performance because the games that are out are underutilizing the hardware? Please say you aren't in that camp. I have yet to see any game on the console running at native 4k/60FPS with any sort of heavy duty RT - which would be a sound argument if there is proof of such a game. How much GPU design you think would be needed to make the Matrix demo run from 1080p/30FPS to native 4k/60FPS? Certainly not a PS5 Pro.
PS1 emulation was handled by the Cell while earlier PS3 models had the EE + GS for full PS2 backwards compatibility.
They're aren't doing that.
Yes mate there has been a small revision under the radar for the three new daulsense colours with stronger springs and improved stick drift. Of course just like the fix with the analog sticks pealing on the DS4 controllers, it hasn't been made official.
Thanks had a typo. I meant getting it would be smart to get a smaller version out. Not that they are.
A PS5 slim is inevitable, but probably coming in 2024.
Good point. But the upgrade did nothing special for games other than what I stated. You need a completely new architecture if you are going to hope on getting PC-like performance with full on RT and a Pro isn't going to do it. End of story.That's exactly what they did, please at least do some research if you are going to debate a point.
AMD Playstation 4 GPU Specs
AMD Liverpool, 800 MHz, 1152 Cores, 72 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR5, 1375 MHz, 256 bitwww.techpowerup.com
AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU Specs
AMD Neo, 911 MHz, 2304 Cores, 144 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR5, 1700 MHz, 256 bit
I would be surprised if they wasted the time doing it tbh.
I doubt that.
The Cell will be in the PSVR2 breakout box.
But the price would probably be 799 usd.
Yes mate there has been a small revision under the radar for the three new daulsense colours with stronger springs and improved stick drift. Of course just like the fix with the analog sticks pealing on the DS4 controllers, it hasn't been made official.
I bought two purple controllers and the triggers felt stronger and the analog sticks feel firmer with no wobble. Two white daulsense's broke on me and I sold the replacement along with a red daulsense.
