Phil Spencer: "You are going to see more of our games on more platforms"

If MS start putting all their games on PS, I will start giving them money again. Until then, not a penny. I honestly can't stand their ecosystem. I still use windows for some gaming, but once support for 10 ends, it looks like it's bye bye from me for good if they continue along their AI path.
 
If MS start putting all their games on PS, I will start giving them money again. Until then, not a penny. I honestly can't stand their ecosystem. I still use windows for some gaming, but once support for 10 ends, it looks like it's bye bye from me for good if they continue along their AI path.
Does (or would) AI integration, into an OS, keep you from using it?
 
Last edited:
"I want to do the journalistically responsible thing" and not follow up on what you just said, and instead change the subject... Granted, Ryan did ask a relevant question (about the studio closures), but when Phil says something like that - "You're going to see more of our games on more platforms," and the crowd obviously reacts - you need to dig further. Don't just drop the subject.
That was embarrasing.
 
Anything with a service needs to go everywhere. Gears, Halo etc. Forza Horizon would be huge on PS5 and sell boatloads so those three games would be multi million sellers alone. If that funds my gamepass then go for it...plus I got more people to play with.
 
Doom day-and-date PS5 release is a huge flag of things to come sooner than later.
Didn't spencer said himself after acquiring Bethesda that games/IPs that have huge community outside Xbox will remain most likely multi platform? Doom was always multi platform, same with Diablo (where it makes even less sense to make DLC exclusive). Also we are seeing recently that MS is loosening their single console approach.
 
Last edited:
Didn't spencer said himself after acquiring Bethesda that games/IPs that have huge community outside Xbox will remain most likely multi platform? Doom was always multi platform, same with Diablo (where it makes even less sense to make DLC exclusive).
There were no reasons not to delay the PS5 launch window for 6 months at least. MS was fully in command to do so, especially after they cancelled the PS5 version of Starfield mid-development.

And in the end they've decided to earn money instead. Nobody can blame them.
 
Last edited:
Doom day-and-date PS5 release is a huge flag of things to come sooner than later.

I think DOOM needed to be day one. Same for next elder scrolls.

Doom is gaming history and it's always been multiplatform. It was even on Nintendo platforms.

Not fair to take that from people.
 
I think DOOM needed to be day one. Same for next elder scrolls.

Doom is gaming history and it's always been multiplatform. It was even on Nintendo platforms.

Not fair to take that from people.
I'm talking strictly about day-and-date. DOOM was bound to be multiplat, but Microsoft could've leverage their IP to boost GamepPass with delayed release tactics easily. They didn't.
 
I'm talking strictly about day-and-date. DOOM was bound to be multiplat, but Microsoft could've leverage their IP to boost GamepPass with delayed release tactics easily. They didn't.

Leverage DOOM? I just don't think that's really fair for DOOM.

I think that game was always going to be multiplat.

Saying that. More games will come day and date. Time for everyone to accept that.
 
Looking forward to all the "exclusives are damaging" posts and tweets .

I'm not surprised really, a co worker on Major Nelsons podcast years ago said he felt this way …"he would put all the content on everything if he could"

for as much as I remember that being said, I can't fucking remember who exactly said it.

The narrative from their subservient soldiers on social media will be on the others to follow suit in a substantial way.

Personally I think it devalues the console side of things and if they had been doing far better in the market , and it's on him and his teams that they are not, they might not of went the way it has this soon.
I think if your average consumer spends far more on software than hardware, it would be logical to make the software as available as possible.
 
It takes a hard working warrior to try to make multiplatform into something bad. Sorry guys, get used to multiplatform games dominating your exclusive plastic boxes.
 
Last edited:
Wonder if they're doing a 6-12 month exclusive period then release on other platforms. Besides previous established franchises that have been multiplat.
 
Its the right call. Why fuck over the devs over your own fuck up in selling a console. As a banger of an event that showcase was, I wont be buying anything on xbox. Just on steam and ps5.
 
This isn't new. Phill said it 1+ year ago that they want games to be available to all consoles.
With this aproach next gen xbox gonna sell less than wiiu, pc players gonna play on pc, playstation players will play on playstation, and the remaining(currently under 30m series S+X) xbox players gonna realise there is literally only negatives of chosing xbox, aka u gonna be cockblocked from playing pc/playstation games if u owe it, so it will be worst choice of a platform .
 
Was any game revealed to be multiplatform at this show?

Was it just doom?
Is any revealed to be exclusive to the Xbox? Even with the games we know for certain are coming to the PS5, they did the "show and tell" thing and saw to it that only core Xbox (and PC) supported platforms were shown. At no point was the word exclusive used though. And that should be telling being that MS pretty much conned the term "console exclusive".

If anything what I am finding interesting, is the number of games from third parties, that are also on gamepass but will also likely be sold on PS.

Reddit made a list.


Just going to quote myself from Thursday last week....

Has anyone noticed, that at every juncture that more Xbox games are announced for Pla..... other platforms, there is always this supporting narrative of how this is all that is planned or that is coming... and the other (likely new) stuff will not be coming.

Then a little later, the new stuff is announced to be coming, along with the usual this is all that is coming talk, and announcement of new stuff that will not be coming.

Or is this pattern only in my head.
At least this time Phil has just put the matter to rest and said more of their stuff will be coming to other platforms.
 
Last edited:
This isn't new. Phill said it 1+ year ago that they want games to be available to all consoles.
Yeah but its not right if dick riders cant make it all about them and make people
Feel shit about owning a certain plastic box.

Either way, I see it as get all these games at a monthly one off fee or buy the games seperatley for full price on other platforms, just your choice what you play on.

For example I spend £300 a month on games, I like a huge majority of the Xbox show so gamepass would most likely save me money, if you play only COD then probably not as you'd spend more than just buying it normally.

Either way I think multi-platform is starting to be the way to go, look at Capcom and how well they are doing, MS probably just wants to recreate that.

Another example, I love halo but the userbase is dwindling, love for MCC and infinite to get that boost again on PC with PS5 players.

Also for those going on about studio closures, Sony has done the same and they have tons of money? - businesses need to cut losses simple as.

Double standards on here are too funny, in a way Xbox brand is dead from an exclusives point, maybe they have to create consoles as a platform because PS and Nintendo wont let them be on their platforms
 

Timestamped 8:15

The non answer about Tango and zero follow up on it and the cheers from a section in the audience tells me all I needed to know about who attended it and what the purpose was… beautiful how the interviewer went straight into the Activision-Blizzard purchase very rapidly as to say "well we know why this is happening… or one of the big catalysts so let's go into that and try to spin it without connecting the dots for people formally".
 
Exactly
I'll pay 0 for bo6 and will probably play it all year where ps players will pay 70 dollars for it I consider it a win
Besides the whole show and all the games except a few expansions are on gp.
If nothing this shows u how insane gamepass as a deal is
Game Pass is free?
 
Last edited:
With this aproach next gen xbox gonna sell less than wiiu, pc players gonna play on pc, playstation players will play on playstation, and the remaining(currently under 30m series S+X) xbox players gonna realise there is literally only negatives of chosing xbox, aka u gonna be cockblocked from playing pc/playstation games if u owe it, so it will be worst choice of a platform .
They're changing the strategy and focusing on service now. If you're on PC then you'll buy their games there full price or subscribe to GP. If you're on other consoles you'll buy their games full price. People who want subscription will buy an Xbox and subscribe to GP.
 
He no longer sees a path forward to being a dominate force sales wise with hardware

Will keep selling to a niche market and try to make more money from other platforms they aren't getting on Gamepass
Although I don't necessarily disagree I do feel that the continued push behind Gamepass must be yielding results and is not this black hole eating money.

7yrs in and Gamepass is improving which tells me the funding is more than ever. I don't see a company like Microsoft keeping a sinking ship afloat for 7yrs that doesn't make sense.

The multiplatform approach currently still looks like select titles rather than across the board. While theres an Xbox (the console) full third-party doesn't make sense but we'll see.
 
Also for those going on about studio closures, Sony has done the same and they have tons of money?
Yes, one loves double standards when trying to make it a Sony-Too deflection now Sony is not in trouble or a laughing stock compared to the MS war chest and has tons of money and comparable to MS in size/value (and is also spending almost $80 Billion in acquiring multiplatform publishers and is hell bent in destroying game value with a GamePass like strategy… :rolleyes: .
 
Last edited:
Although I don't necessarily disagree I do feel that the continued push behind Gamepass must be yielding results and is not this black hole eating money.
Sunk cost fallacy is a thing. GamePass is not picking up many people on PC and Xbox as a platform is lagging and growth is thus stagnating and people are buying less and less software which hurts first and third parties too.
 
If MS start putting all their games on PS, I will start giving them money again. Until then, not a penny. I honestly can't stand their ecosystem. I still use windows for some gaming, but once support for 10 ends, it looks like it's bye bye from me for good if they continue along their AI path.
I hate to break it to you, but AI is going to become the future or the core of every major OS on the planet. It simply allows for OS's to be used in the most organic human-like way/interface possible.

For me, when I became a believer of it, I was trying to import my media library from what was my Linux server to a Windows 11 PC. At the time I just had enough of Linux, it started to get annoying with all the micro managing and noticing that otherwise simple things are just more complicated on Linux.

Anyways, everything was on Ext4, and short of some third party paying for this or that on Windows, I wouldn't be able to copy and paste my 20TB strong library to the new system I was building. I basically needed to recursively copy the entire file path tree of my media folders but leave out the actual content. And for the life of me I didn't know how to do that. I literally just asked a question in the co-pilot preview and it showed me a detailed walkthrough of how to get it done.
 
Anything with a service needs to go everywhere. Gears, Halo etc. Forza Horizon would be huge on PS5 and sell boatloads so those three games would be multi million sellers alone. If that funds my gamepass then go for it...plus I got more people to play with.
I have said this before, and I will say it again. I believe at some point, gamepass will be on PS platforms. Just the same way we have EA Play. It could be a $70/year or $10/month service and only have MS-published games on it. The games will also be on sale on the PS store too. Just where I see MS going.
 
Yeah that's an edited clip to fit a narrative I guess. In reality it was like a twenty minute talk where they said everything except only four games are ever going MP. Hell right after that cut out clip he went on to say software exclusive to one platform will be less and less in the future.

Not only that but GAF has been flooded with posts and threads about all the games coming to PS5, specifically because MS didn't hammer it down that no further games were coming.

So on one hand we've had weeks of posts about "Phil didn't say no more games are coming!" and now it's "Oh man he threw down this ironclad PROMISE that only those four games are coming!!"

It's cute, but it's child talk. Do you not get tired of being a child? 😆
Errrrr.....

What you are showing here, is a classic case of not being able to see the forest from the trees.

You will learn.
 
Sunk cost fallacy is a thing. GamePass is not picking up many people on PC and Xbox as a platform is lagging and growth is thus stagnating and people are buying less and less software which hurts first and third parties too.
It would also be a fallacy to assume a fallacy 😁. You could be right, but there is no way for us to know, atm.
 
Not bad, just different, and people should be able to acknowledge the difference.
That quite literally was the point, the user you responded to, was making. "It's not bad. Things are going to be different. Get used it" (I'm paraphrasing of course).

It takes a hard working warrior to try to make multiplatform into something bad. Sorry guys, get used to multiplatform games dominating your exclusive plastic boxes.
And your response
If Netflix put all their content on Amazon then few people would subscribe to Netflix.
 
Last edited:
Sunk cost fallacy is a thing. GamePass is not picking up many people on PC and Xbox as a platform is lagging and growth is thus stagnating and people are buying less and less software which hurts first and third parties too.
Do you have data of the latter or just assumptions? No company is going to burn money just because.
 
Yeah that's an edited clip to fit a narrative I guess. In reality it was like a twenty minute talk where they said everything except only four games are ever going MP. Hell right after that cut out clip he went on to say software exclusive to one platform will be less and less in the future.

Not only that but GAF has been flooded with posts and threads about all the games coming to PS5, specifically because MS didn't hammer it down that no further games were coming.

So on one hand we've had weeks of posts about "Phil didn't say no more games are coming!" and now it's "Oh man he threw down this ironclad PROMISE that only those four games are coming!!"

It's cute, but it's child talk. Do you not get tired of being a child? 😆
It was just a handfull of die-hard Xbox fans saying only 4 games would come.

Anyone with a functional brain and good hearing knew Spencer said more games would come.
 
Current Xbox hardware is in the bin and future Xbox hardware will only be a niche product.

Xbox is first and foremost a software publisher now.
 
Salty motherfukers all around
I'm ok with people paying 70 for bo6 and it's on gamepass day 1
More people can join in the game more people to play with
Xbox is a gamepass machine now
There is 0 reason to buy Xbox without gamepass
And no matter how salty and butt hurt u are u can't deny the insane value of gamepass.
 
Last edited:
Opinions or facts? If it's the latter show the evidence?
I would go as far as say... not opinion, nor facts... just common sense. But we seem to be at a point now where common sense is no longer common and we can't use our own brains to think and instead need everything to be spoon-fed to us.
It would also be a fallacy to assume a fallacy 😁. You could be right, but there is no way for us to know, atm.
I dare say there is. As I said above, common sense.

Its that same common sense that made some of us call out exactly what is happening now... over 5 years ago. Simple common sense that allowed some of us see what path lay ahead for Xbox.

I'll put it this way, around 2019, I said in "another forum", the following
- Day one gamepass would not exist if MS were still able to move 10M+ copies of game sales at full or close to full price on any of their tent pole IPs.
- gamepass on PC would not exist if gamepass on Xbox on its own was sustainable.
- if there is not a significant rise in the install base of gamepass, MS will get to a point where they would have to release their games on other platforms, which would include Playstation. And I doubled down on this the second MS started buying publishers out.

Now I am no genius, and definitely not some sort of prophet. But everything I said above, however many years ago... was just common sense. And this is one of the reasons I have been saying for a while that I do not trust MS. Because, to me, this progression of events was obvious, but I suspected MS would go about it in the most dubious and shady of ways as they tend to do with almost everything else they touch. And that is exactly what they have done.

Eg... in February this year, just a few short months ago when Phil came on and clearly said, just these four games are coming, and no one should take this as a sign of things to come, at that time, he KNEW that a fair number of other games were already being worked on for the PS. And mind you, at the time they acquired Bethesda, they flat-out said that future Bethesda games would be exclusive to Xbox.
In this case, you're getting all the Netflix content by subscribing to Netflix or buying individual Netflix shows on Amazon.
Let's not forget the $400+ upfront investment cost to subscribe to Netflix if we are going to keep using their weird analogy.
Lots of speculation being presented as fact in here. What's new, it's neogaf (or better yet.. "it's the Internet)
I don't know man... as it stands, I would sooner take the ramblings of some random poster on GAF over anything that MS says. Sounds crazy I know, but how many times does a company need to talk out of both sides of its mouth for people to realize that nothing they say can be trusted?
 
Last edited:
I liked how he really emphasised that call of duty black ops 6 is coming to all platforms at exactly the same time whereas playstation unfortunately are really against that philosophy.

Its nice to see, everyone wins!
 
Top Bottom