PS6 will use 160W to save on costs. Sonys main goal is making a more affordable console which was not a goal with the PS5. PS6 will be more similar to the modest PS4 in that sense.
Yeap this will have prebuilts level prices not PS5 pricing.
Hope worst not situation? The fuck is that hat.
Nope, RDNA5 won't be ready till 2027. Its the same issue PS5 and Xbox Series X had with RDNA2 in 2020.
12 MB L3 cache is a small amount though.
Nah it's more like RDNA5 is not ready till 2027. Which would mean MS would be stuck on RDNA4 but RDNA4 is going to be greatly outclassed by RDNA5 so there's no point hamstringing yourself releasing a year earlier. Think how much worse the Xbox Series X and S would have been if they used RDNA1 instead of 2 because they launched in 2019.
Aren't you doing the same thing?
NPU is significantly more efficient than the GPU and can handle its own tasks while the GPU can do other things. But the GPU does have advantages as well, that said by 2027 I expect software to leverage the NPU more than currently. Right now NPUs are largely untapped as software developers are waiting for more hardware adoption. Only gaming use for NPU I know off is Microsofts Super Resolution AI upscalers.
Consoles also used to offer better value down the line. The PS4 launched in November 2013 for $400. By September 2016, it was $300, a whopping 25% price decrease. The PS5, if it had followed the same trajectory, would be selling for $375 for the disc drive model and $300. Instead, they're now $500 and $550 in the US.
By 'that platform" I was referring to Magnus which is RDNA5/Zen6. As in they share core architecture which means they share some critical paths.
I doubt higher clocks has a significant effect on RnD costs per unit.
I dont think sony is going for cheap.. I think they are going for higher margins
Is there real evidence or is it again something you are inferring from something you felt when watching his content? Where has he clearly misinformed / lied?
Timestamp it please.
The consoles don't have anywhere near the severity of stuttering that PC builds do in UE5. So many games I've refunded on Steam and ended up getting on PS5 due to it. I can handle the blurry image quality and dips below 60fps on PS5 Pro, but constant stuttering even when at a higher FPS on PC is far worse.
I don't have the timestamp, but what he said was that when he got the info on Magnus, he wasn't sure, and was only 50/50 which Console it belonged to. So he chose to say it was for PS6, because that gets better clicks, he apologized for any misleading early video, saying, that wasn't his goal.
At this point. Most of them. From worse traversal stutter, to simply panning the camera. Variable refresh can't do anything for it.
And what's the problem with it? He got corrected quite quickly and he admitted error himself
Ellis
mentioned is not on consoles because... console games are locked to 60fps most of the time. Locking fps is also a fix for this.
And the truth is that the stutter problem, as he said, is way worse in PC, as in more frequent, in more games and in many cases more milliseconds per stutter. Not that I care, I loved my saving stutter in Halo 3, but better tell the truth than be a PC jihadist. That's a thing for Germans...
I've tried this myself on PC. Even dropping the refresh from 120 to 60hz. It did not fix the issue.Better to tell the truth than to lie to defend your favorite piece of plastic.
UE5 is full of issues, and those issues manifest on all platforms. That camera stutter
Dead Space is broken on PC, same with Jedi Survivor. There are games that are objectively worse on PC.
Normally not a problem, he could've simply stated that he wasn't fully sure which Console it belongs to. But instead of doing that, he specifically labeled it PS6, then created a false narrative trying to reinforce that idea. Like saying this massive die with a chiplet design is exactly something Mark Cerny would design....
Just watch all the videos from DF five years from now.
I might be Spanish but not even us have that much time while working.
'All that is left'.
SHf is the most recent games I refunded and picked up on PS5 Pro.
Bojji
provides evidence. Can you provide evidence to show how drastically different it is on PC vs PS5. Any games from this gen will be fine. Let's make it fair.
My great grandad was a Spaniard. That fucker only had one real job in his life, and it was working on the Titanic's hull when he emigrated here. That didn't go well in the end
.
Well, of course it is a Tim Sweeny problem! His and the devs that decide to use that POS engine instead of making one of its own (when indy devs like the guys of the rats games can). The thing is that you can't brute force that, as you said: there is no reason why this has to have stutter on a 32GB + 16 GB RAM/VRAM machine with M2 of 7000MB/s. And Tim Piggy is focused on optimizing his deadweight on consoles (or at least so it seems from the games so far), which is why the discussed value proposition of the Magnus being discussed here is valid (if it finally doesn't run on Windows) and it'll probably outperform in many cases similarly priced PCs.
Letting anglos drown while going to the Americas to spread the superior Spaniard DNA, what a hero...My great grandad was a Spaniard. That fucker only had one real job in his life, and it was working on the Titanic's hull when he emigrated here. That didn't go well in the end
A little bit of banter with my favourite Pole can't be compared to go to a whole channel looking for examples, but sinceBut you have time to comment and make statements that a poster is being disingenuous
Ellis
mentioned Dead Space...
Yes but nude mods.
You just checkmated everyone.
I don't think a pre-built with a 5080-tier GPU will cost $2-2.5K in early 2027. More like $1.5K I'm guessing.
