WC/Jez: Microsoft's ambitious new Xbox: Your entire Xbox console library, the full power of Windows PC gaming, and no multiplayer paywall

Will you buy the next Xbox hardware?


  • Total voters
    416
Good points. I just have an abundance of cyncism when it comes to Microsoft doing what they say they will do these days. Like I said in my follow up, I think native BC is simply a must. Xbox on PC minus the Xbox games just isn't an Xbox. It is like leaving the soul of Xbox behind. I feel like that whenever the new Xbox is finally revealed, BC is going to be a big thing a lot of people will be honing in on. That and price, of course.
My suspicion is that their long-term goal is to transition fully into the PC world and focus on publishing games and making prebuilt PC

But to get there, you need this transitory period of time where you offer BC hardware
 
Good points. I just have an abundance of cyncism when it comes to Microsoft doing what they say they will do these days. Like I said in my follow up, I think native BC is simply a must. Xbox on PC minus the Xbox games just isn't an Xbox. It is like leaving the soul of Xbox behind. I feel like that whenever the new Xbox is finally revealed, BC is going to be a big thing a lot of people will be honing in on. That and price, of course.
I would be super shocked if this next machine doesn't have native BC built into the chip and if not what was the point of developing this Magnus chip, why not pull all off the shelf parts?
 
I would be super shocked if this next machine doesn't have native BC built into the chip and if not what was the point of developing this Magnus chip, why not pull all off the shelf parts?

Ok.....concensus is my concern is unwarranted.

Paul Dano Yes GIF by Searchlight Pictures
 
Magnus is an AMD product, has nothing to with MS anyway

You will find the same SoC in many other Mini-PCs
No, Magnus is a semi-custom chip, just like Scarlett was for Series X. It may include specific instructions for BC, as well as a GDDR memory bus with high bandwidth and a huge GPU for an SOC. These types of SOCs are never available outside the console market.
 
You know the smart marketing move (if this thing is going to be expensive anyway) is to have to have it come with an Xbox branded, mouse, keyboard and controller. If the message is that this is the only machine you need for gaming and productivity, the messaging should start with what they give you in the box. The marketing is easy, here are your controls for productivity, and here is your controls for your leisure time. They will miss a great opportunity if they don't do this. Slam the message home immediately about what this device is and what it can do as opposed to just a console or just a standard PC.
Agree 100%.

It would be a bit strange if they officially advertise features to exit FSE, but then expect the user to go out and buy a mouse and keyboard if they suddenly decide to use battle.net, GoG... or excel. If you are pitching this as a do-it-all, then might as well make it convenient for the buyer. At least have an option to ship it with a couch friendly keyboard and mouse, if not part of a standard bundle.
 
It's Microsoft who popularised it and their fanbase who accepted it and even defended it. They and there fanbase are absolutely to blame.

While it's true Sony and nintendo aren't forced to follow, but that's what happens when at the time one of the popular consoles(360) has made it acceptable to make money from online pay walls.
I remember when PSN was free and people were shitting on it and would rather pay and play on Xbox live. That was very telling. Imagine Microsoft actually having that kind of strength in that one area and still botching everything else to become number 3 over and over again.
 
Last edited:
It's hard to imagine that the huge amounts of money Microsoft pays their marketing teams, that this could have been a simple mistake. They have to know what they are doing by now. Right?
*adjusts glasses* I was just making the "joke", that according to De Morgan's law, "NOT p AND NOT q" equals "NOT (p OR q)". Don't try to look to much into it.
 
Last edited:
I remember when PSN was free and people were shitting on it and would rather pay and play on Xbox live. That was very telling. Imagine Microsoft actually having that kind of strength in that one area and still botching everything else to become number 3 over and over again.

I remember these discussions very well during the PS3 era...

"It's free but it sucks, I'd rather pay and have the quality of Xbox LIVE"

When Sony did just that with PS4, it became bad for consumers....

Unreal

Now MS goes PC because Xbox is dead and free multiplayer is a big deal again

LOL
 
Last edited:
Microsoft absoltuley had a influence in popularising online pay walls. Nothing hilarious about it, they had a very popular console and had advantages over playstation during that gen that allow them to introduce that shitty practice.

Just a minor historical correction. MS charged for Xbox Live from the start. It was introduced in 2002, about halfway through the original Xbox era. They didn't wait until the 360 gen to do it. It was already in place by then.
 
Steam isn't a monopoly. There are plenty of alternatives and people will choose the best one. Steam offers the best features and has the most robust games catalog because they nurtured PC gaming for the past 20 years.

The 30% cut is industry standard too. As well, depending on the amount of units sold for a title, Steam will decrease their cut.

Iirc, it was Epic who started the whole 'Steam bad for taking 30% cut' malarkey. Crazy that there's still people believing that to this day.
 
copied it from somewhere else:

===

New marching orders are clearly in. They've seen the drop off in people investing in xbox by actually buying games so have told their mouthpieces that all games will definitely carry over to the next Xbox without xbox every having to confirm this so when it inevitably doesn't happen because publishers refuse to renegotiate the licenses Xbox will just deny they ever said it.
The exact same playbook as the rog ally, anybody still falling for this deserves what they get.

===


It is quite possible that the retro is the same as the x360 for the xbox one, with the aggravating factor of being another platform, the majority of publishers do not authorize this easily, as was the case with the xbox one retro.

 
I would be super shocked if this next machine doesn't have native BC built into the chip and if not what was the point of developing this Magnus chip, why not pull all off the shelf parts?
If you're targeting a particular thermal/power-envelope, you can always do more with semi-custom than off-the shelf.
And the 'only' console-like element left in this thing is that it's a box with set thermal/power targets. If we take that away - we really should stop pretending this is anything other than a PC with an extra name-sticker. Then again MS did do that before - ie. Surface (but I don't think anyone wants hardware specs/price ratio that used to have...)

I still say that the real reason for 'BC on a chip' is some sort of authentication that allows them to masquerade any APU as a console in the future(including 3rd party boxes) and satisfies the license hounds that would refuse to have them the whole XBox library otherwise.
If all they are doing is support for few custom hw-extensions Series had (for easy compatibility), then we're not getting access to the full library at launch - I'll make a modem eating bet on that.
 
Last edited:
Read the OP, yes it will.
But how can it have a version of Windows de cluttered and optimised for gaming and at the same time have all the legacy stuff needed to run old programs and operate old devices?
And if it runs any program like any other pc it will also need security stuff/antivírus constantly running in the background.
It's literally just a pc with all the negatives of a pc then.
 
I am not saying this is what happened but sure looks like it

Imagine leaving your dream job to go help facilitate a takeover and once completed instead of getting rewarded you are told to get the fuck out

Again, thats what seemed to have happened

Golden Globes Reaction GIF

Can't say I blame him for being sour if that's what happened.
 
But how can it have a version of Windows de cluttered and optimised for gaming and at the same time have all the legacy stuff needed to run old programs and operate old devices?
And if it runs any program like any other pc it will also need security stuff/antivírus constantly running in the background.
It's literally just a pc with all the negatives of a pc then.
No one knows. Everything is just speculation.
 
Time will tell bro. I'm still not doubting you. I wouldn't be surprised if a closed console is still being tossed around with PC being the backup plan. @SneakersSO says things are still in flux so it sounds like things are not set in stone yet and K KeplerL2 has backed you up. MS has not publicly committed to any one course of action except that there will be first party hardware.

I think a PC makes more sense when we say "Xbox" that has other stores like Steam. Traditional console makes more sense when it comes to BC. So I got no clue

Steve Martin Idk GIF
If MS somehow got the legal problems of doing Xbox BC on Windows sorted, then I can see them only bothering with "Xbox PC". But I still think the 1st-party Xbox console and 3rd-party Xbox PC will end up as different things.
 
Last edited:
Yes I'll buy it. If it's what they are saying here : all my Xbox library (I'm here since OG day one), PC power, no paywall for online (even though I'll probably have a GP sub).

But if that's again some fantasy from jez condom... I'm not sure.
 
If MS somehow got the legal problems of doing Xbox BC on Windows sorted, then I can see them only bothering with "Xbox PC". But I still think the 1st-party Xbox console and 3rd-party Xbox PC will end up as different things.
Always how I heard it, Xbox console that has the BC and Xbox PC (Asus and the likes) will not have BC
 
Always how I heard it, Xbox console that has the BC and Xbox PC (Asus and the likes) will not have BC
That doesn't mean the hardware is different though. It could be a case of just needing encryption keys to access functionality.

I thought the only custom aspect of Magnus was going to be the chiplet arrangement. Just like everything else that chooses that platform will be able to customise, or at least choose from a set of off the shelf specs. But the BC was baked into the platform, all of it. So I was more wondering whether Xbox would license those keys out, which in your scenario, they wouldn't.
 
Last edited:
Do they have corpo ozempic parties or something? Pulled up some older images and he used to have some fat content on his face. Talking about the actual interview footage, not the linked picture in the article.
 
Last edited:
Do they have corpo ozempic parties or something? Pulled up some older images and he used to have some fat content on his face. Talking about the actual interview footage, not the linked picture in the article.
well, MS spent closer to $100B on Xbox and still failed, and they are balls deep in the AI race (which is not making money) pressure is high.
 

And that basically confirms the Console form factor isn't going away, and neither are the GDKX optimized game versions aka Console SKUs.

Like I said before, full convergence is about bringing together the two game dev environments together for both PC and Console form factors, not getting rid of either. So Consoles will be have PC store access with Windows SDK games and Xbox PC will have Forwards Compatibility with GDKX optimized versions. It's a new paradigm, both are products that currently don't exist.
Satya going for the Guiness Book of World Records for the number of contradictory statements ever in one interview

Do It Reaction GIF
First statement he is talking about that they both use the same technologies. Windows NT kernel, Win32 app model aka Windows API, unified dev environment with GDK/GDKX. Thus they're the same in his eyes, just separated due to form factors. Second statement is about creating a new paradigm, of devices that don't currently exist. Consoles that can run PC games too in addition to Console games. And PCs that can run Console games too in addition to PC games. That's the innovation.
 
And that basically confirms the Console form factor isn't going away, and neither are the GDKX optimized game versions aka Console SKUs.

Like I said before, full convergence is about bringing together the two game dev environments together for both PC and Console form factors, not getting rid of either. So Consoles will be have PC store access with Windows SDK games and Xbox PC will have Forwards Compatibility with GDKX optimized versions. It's a new paradigm, both are products that currently don't exist.

First statement he is talking about that they both use the same technologies. Windows NT kernel, Win32 app model aka Windows API, unified dev environment with GDK/GDKX. Thus they're the same in his eyes, just separated due to form factors. Second statement is about creating a new paradigm, of devices that don't currently exist. Consoles that can run PC games too in addition to Console games. And PCs that can run Console games too in addition to PC games. That's the innovation.

Star Trek GIF
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom