Insane Metal
Member
Hopefully this regime falls and she doesn't get killed for doing this.
Edit: apparently she's in Canada not Iran.
Last edited:
I don't think the west needs IRGC help with being anti-western. EU is trying hard in that by itself.If Iran falls many Western IRGC cells fueling anti - semitic and anti-western sentiments on our streets will be defunded. What a beautiful thing that would be.
If Iran falls many Western IRGC cells fueling anti - semitic and anti-western sentiments on our streets will be defunded. What a beautiful thing that would be.
Honestly, I don't know much about Iran, but I did not expect to see snow!Hopefully this regime falls and she doesn't get killed for doing this.
Can't wait for that one.If the Iran collapses soon, we can prepare for a bigger war in the Middle East. Will be a showdown between Turkey and Israel.
Russians are still living ok. They have food water etc.What I find fucking tragic is that Russia has experienced as many as 1.2 million casualties (possibly 500 thousand actual deaths) for so little gain relative to the cost. And yet, last I knew, there was no active uproar against him. Maybe I'm wrong and missed something, but I just can't even fathom that here in the States. That many dead and such a colossal failure of the goal in just a few years? I can't even imagine what that backlash would look like. We've had politicians shot at for way less.
Nah, Turkey is part of NATO and also will never really do anything but talk.If the Iran collapses soon, we can prepare for a bigger war in the Middle East. Will be a showdown between Turkey and Israel.
Russians are serfs. They know nothing else.What I find fucking tragic is that Russia has experienced as many as 1.2 million casualties (possibly 500 thousand actual deaths) for so little gain relative to the cost. And yet, last I knew, there was no active uproar against him. Maybe I'm wrong and missed something, but I just can't even fathom that here in the States. That many dead and such a colossal failure of the goal in just a few years? I can't even imagine what that backlash would look like. We've had politicians shot at for way less.
Russian are serfs. They know nothing else.
Maybe you, but not me.We in the West are debt slaves.
It is already happening though. Not only in Syria but the whole Greece + Israel alliance is about containing Turkey too. Morocco - the same situation to contain Turkish influence in Libya etc.Nah, Turkey is part of NATO and also will never really do anything but talk.
Maybe you, but not me.![]()
People should not live above their means.I am not either, but most are where I am from.
Removed due to not finding evidence.
Rumor was Iran leader dead.
The vast majority of those fighting in Ukraine are contract soldiers who are paid a lot of money. If they had been mobilized, there would have been an uproar.What I find fucking tragic is that Russia has experienced as many as 1.2 million casualties (possibly 500 thousand actual deaths) for so little gain relative to the cost. And yet, last I knew, there was no active uproar against him.
All of the people suffer there including the people in their army. Faith can take you so far where you struggle to live normally.This is surreal to watch. This regime is on its heels and it's gong to fall. It's giving off the impression that they're in panic mode due to some defections.
How little trust does the government have in the army if they can't even trust there army to deal with separatists. IRGC are specifically a regime protection force. May they all meet their end soon.
Article: The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world.
Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime.
Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it.
Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on "brown people," Arabs, or "the Middle East," as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine.
This confusion is rooted in historical illiteracy. Western liberal media routinely collapses entire civilizations into a single stereotype: "all Middle Easterners are Arabs," "all Arabs are Muslim," and "all Muslims are a monolithic, oppressed identity group by white European colonizers." Iranians disappear entirely in this framework. Their language, history, and culture—Persian, not Arab; ancient, not colonial; distinct, not interchangeable—are erased.
By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely.
There is another reason the Iranian uprising is so threatening to Western media is economic issues.
As you know, Iran is not only a religious dictatorship. It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government's dark void of empty promises.
Covering Iran honestly would require acknowledging that these policies are harmful. They have been tried. They have failed. Catastrophically.
This is deeply inconvenient for Western media institutions that routinely promote expansive state control, centralized economic planning, and technocratic governance as morally enlightened alternatives to liberal capitalism. Iran demonstrates where such systems lead when insulated from accountability and enforced by ideology. It shows that when the state controls livelihoods, non-conformity becomes existentially dangerous. That lesson cannot be acknowledged without undermining the moral authority of those who advocate similar ideas in softer language.
Western liberal media prefers not to hear this. Acknowledging it would require abandoning the lazy moral categories that dominate modern discourse: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, white and non-white. Iranian protesters do not fit. They show that authoritarianism is not a Western invention imposed from outside, but something many societies are actively trying to escape.
That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the Iranian people are being ignored.
So the silence continues.
Sensitive Young Men are taking notice
So Western media is self-censoring due to cognitive dissonance? It makes no sense to me. At least the tin-foil explanation of government pressure or business pressure had some logic behind it. What's the logic here?
But how did we get to a point where almost all news media is so narrative-driven that it ignores reality?Left wing activists have been preaching Islam is a good thing for a long time.
And now we see Iran denouncing and refusing Islamism.
So Western media is self-censoring due to cognitive dissonance? It makes no sense to me. At least the tin-foil explanation of government pressure or business pressure had some logic behind it. What's the logic here?
But how did we get to a point where almost all news media is so narrative-driven that it ignores reality?
Do ratings plummet when a story doesn't fit people's biases?
I don't disagree, but how did it happen that mainstream media became so biased towards one direction? It's still a free market, surely there is demand for the opposite narrative as well.The alliance socialist-islam is a thing that nobody with half a brain can deny at this point.
Leftists see islam as a useful idiot to destroy actual liberal democracies. Islam see leftists as a useful idiot to conquer christian-based nations. Two parasites who benefit from each other. Both should be purged.
Fo the most part, legacy news media is only consumed by the older generations. The average age of the CNN and Fox News viewer is like 68 or something. There is nobody besides the Boomers who actually are consuming the legacy media and it is dying quickly as the old generations age out of being able to consume media at allBut how did we get to a point where almost all news media is so narrative-driven that it ignores reality?
Do ratings plummet when a story doesn't fit people's biases?
The reasons are unrelated but Hollywood is dying too. The entire entertainment industry in LA is in an economic crisis of their own making, because all generations are turning away from the unpleasant politically agenda driven content that Hollywood pivoted to exclusively making in the 2010's
I am not sure why it does not make sense for you considering that the media has been propping up Hamas whole last year, believing every number provided by their authorities. Add to that the fact that there are many many lefists / liberals working in the media. We see it in USA and it is kinda worse in the Europe. The current Iranian regime represents everything that democrats and Europeans want to be - unfortunately for them the regime is collapsing in real-time and it becomes inconvenient to cover, as it would require explanations why it happened and suddenly Starmer (as an example) turns into ayatollahSo Western media is self-censoring due to cognitive dissonance? It makes no sense to me. At least the tin-foil explanation of government pressure or business pressure had some logic behind it. What's the logic here?
100% I mean without X, only some small forums would post anything about that. But together with Starlink it is a huge headache for governments as they have trouble suppressing people.Ratings have been falling for most news channels, as more and more people realize they lie so much.
It is not a free market - just like with tampons in the men's lockers - you have peer pressure, amplified by loud women with suicidal empathy and having support of men who want to sleep with them.I don't disagree, but how did it happen that mainstream media became so biased towards one direction? It's still a free market, surely there is demand for the opposite narrative as well.
Iranian women especially. I studied with one in Canada and she was cooki af but beautiful so it didn't matter.Middle eastern women are some of the most beautiful in the world
My understanding was the sheer amount of horrifying reports coming from Gaza, the left's tendency to automatically take the side of those who are suffering more, and the usual dose of antisemitism.I am not sure why it does not make sense for you considering that the media has been propping up Hamas whole last year, believing every number provided by their authorities.
This could be part of the case, it'd be interesting to check the numbers. I always attributed the decline in quality of mainstream news to the internet offering cheaper alternatives, leading to less income.Add to that the fact that there are many many lefists / liberals working in the media.
You've lost me here. The west wants to be an oppressive patriarchal dictatorship?We see it in USA and it is kinda worse in the Europe. The current Iranian regime represents everything that democrats and Europeans want to be -
Suicidal empathy is exactly why I was expecting to see more coverage from the left.It is not a free market - just like with tampons in the men's lockers - you have peer pressure, amplified by loud women with suicidal empathy and having support of men who want to sleep with them.
Suicidal empathy applies to "killing the west." Iran has been one of the loudest anti-Western forces, while also being an Islamist state. Persians are not anti-Western, nor are they Islamic people. Liberals in general love Islam due to its "collectivism" and "divine state authority" - aka big government as king. And now we see the fall of the Islamic state. It does not look great for the people who supported Hamas, Islam, and anti-Western ideologies to see a prime example of what they want - a centralized Islamist government that hates the West - collapse.Suicidal empathy is exactly why I was expecting to see more coverage.
Kind of. We saw it with the Biden administration and with what the UK and EU have done (not every country within the EU falls in line, though). Governments across Europe (the UK is the most egregious in that regard) are favoring Islamists and censorship; they are arresting people who post negative things about the government and Muslims online, etc. The reason for that is relatively simple, though - a lot of migrants are coming from impoverished countries, so even if the quality of life in the UK drops, it won't matter; but they are coming from dictatorial states where they are used to big governments oppressing people. It is kind of difficult for the government to support or cover up the case where a state like this falls. BBC has been posting about Hamas being "good guys," and now you are saying the bigger Hamas is falling apart due to people rebelling against the oppressive government. It's like imagining if Palestinians rebelled against Hamas. I wonder what the coverage would be. Probably "Terror groups propped up by Israel are at it again" or something.You've lost me here. The west wants to be an oppressive patriarchal dictatorship?
If nothing else this is iconic. Change be coming.
![]()