Western painters vs Japanese painters."Painting has been held back for years with challenges around lighting and making images photorealistic. As you can see, DLSS5 tremendously benefits all oil paintings, including all-time classics."
AMD gpus on console ....so no.
Push back on what????TikTok filters for games...
Fuck this. I hope the industry really pushes back on this one.
It's gen-AI bullshit, it's not magic.
It's gen-AI bullshit, it's not magic.
From their own press release:
"Twenty-five years after NVIDIA invented the programmable shader, we are reinventing computer graphics once again," said Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of NVIDIA. "DLSS 5 is the GPT moment for graphics — blending hand-crafted rendering with generative AI to deliver a dramatic leap in visual realism while preserving the control artists need for creative expression."
NVIDIA DLSS 5 Delivers AI-Powered Breakthrough In Visual Fidelity For Games
NVIDIA DLSS 5 infuses pixels with photorealistic lighting and materials to bridge the gap between rendering and reality.www.nvidia.com
I was gonna reply "We are the Champions" due to the mustache, but then I remembered he plays for Liverpool...Some Event Horizon shit going on. His moustache got sicker, though.
What is bad? The tech? Or how its being used. Because those sre two totally different things.
Becomes older... lol. Thats not because the lighting changed, thats becxause for whatever reason devs sucj at making good pre teen or teen models. This has been going on for decades. This new tech doesnt make them look olderr, its makes certain things obvious. Like take that Hogwarts screenshot going around of the guy. Be honest, look at the DLSS off image... does that really look like a 15yr old to you?
Ok now this is bullshit. First off, RT (or more specifically, lighting) is the absolute holy grail or most important thing in graphic rendering. Its the single most valueable asset to how a game actually looks. And any new tech... has a cost.
I love AI... I do not like how it's used sometimes. But that's the issue here. There is a difference in that.I see that at least some influencers are seeing the problems (at least for now). On the other hand seeing other people cheering for that, it is already over, like the whole AI market. I don't think that betting everything on AI (like hardware and rendering development) will end well. Just like Game Pass wasn't good for Xbox but some people were thrilled about it.
It's gen-AI bullshit, it's not magic.
From their own press release:
"Twenty-five years after NVIDIA invented the programmable shader, we are reinventing computer graphics once again," said Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of NVIDIA. "DLSS 5 is the GPT moment for graphics — blending hand-crafted rendering with generative AI to deliver a dramatic leap in visual realism while preserving the control artists need for creative expression."
NVIDIA DLSS 5 Delivers AI-Powered Breakthrough In Visual Fidelity For Games
NVIDIA DLSS 5 infuses pixels with photorealistic lighting and materials to bridge the gap between rendering and reality.www.nvidia.com
This is so bad. It literally looks like all that thumbnails for "Consoles vs PC" videos, where PC image is generated for bigger contrast and is a clickbait. Now we can have this in games, great!
It looks bad, it makes everything look the same (I mean game by game), it changes the look because it's exaggerating everything (everyone becomes older). And it breaks the photorealistic feel when the animation starts because it still is an in-game animation. But probably soon they will 'fix' even this (but this will be harder to sell as 'game assets').
It was ok-ish when it was only for those funny pictures, but now…
And you are really cheering for that?
I don't like the direction in which corporations are pushing the mankind. Nvidia is forcing everything to sell it's AI dominance. They forced RT (that it was one of holy grails of graphics but it was and actually still is too early for that). They are forcing PT (which is even more problematic for hardware). One of the reasons we need upscaling/reconstructing from lower resolutions is that they are pushing too much. So now we need AI to do that. And even though that DLSS and FSR (now even PSSR) are becoming good at it, it still degrades the image. I was playing RE9 on PS5 Pro and the image has many instabilities, noises, strange behaviors. Pragmata's demo on PC (5090) also had issues. Now Nvidia will be forcing more 'realistic' character.
I see that at least some influencers are seeing the problems (at least for now
So yeah, no for this deepfake, soft generative slop. And if characters in Starfield look bad, blame the developers and don't give them easy/lazy/cheap 'fix'.
The tech is absolutely incredible. Just because the face doesn't look exactly like the source material, it doesn't mean you should throw the baby out with the bathwater. You get real-life photorealism at relatively little cost. The technology is mind-blowing.
Sorry, it was a Spur of the moment reaction.
I think you should go back and read what you posted earlier, magic man, about it being NOT a filter, and the difference in appearance due to the Huang'er's lighting from the future.
if AI filters find acceptance they`re not gonna stay an "option".
Earliest it shows up in console space could be ps6pr0 so maybe by 2032 , and even then it will be super niche anyways kinda like ps5pr0 is now.
Nor should we. I wonder if people ever stop to think of what kinda hardware we would need to natively do what AI allows us do.
Earliest it shows up in console space could be ps6pr0 so maybe by 2032 , and even then it will be super niche anyways kinda like ps5pr0 is now.
That tech needs substantial vram pool, nuff said
Actual widerange console adoption wont happen earlier than 2036 aka ps7 launch and by then who really can predict how its gonna look or how much of performance hit will be needed to work properly.
Yh... He seems to have an arsenal of those reactions.
She turned into Amber Heard!
I don't know.
Swap the DLSS 5 label with 'Resident Evil PS6 Remake' and
people would rave about this "next-gen visuals"
I'm actually praying that they do... If they have some version of this tech running then it can do wonders for lighting. I'm not worried about much else because I know devs will figure out ways to use this the right way.
I think max we can expect is proper ai upscaling and rt capabilities this time, maybe including coding to the metal in exclusive games 5080 grade, bit less in multiplats.
That's what I'm thinking! Her lips literally have filler in the DLSS5 image. The 'just lighting' crowd are delusional.
Comparing pictures of concept art on a sunny day to a real life winter shot is some next level cope I've seenSecond picture loses all the art for the sake of realism.
Thing is, realism is really, really boring. Even MSFS and GT7 are striving for more stylized and polished level of 'realism' for said reasons.
It's artistic reality vs real leality.Comparing pictures of concept art on a sunny day to a real life winter shot is some next level cope I've seen
Okay, this one made me legit laugh out loud.
This is nothing to do with "skinning". It's a post processing step performed on the generated output. The input frame would already have all the NTC data encoded in it. i.e.: The "Before" image. While a GBuffer will have material data and other data encoded in it, "Textures" are just colours, and can be sampled arbitrarily. The Neural Net doesn't know where it came from.
No, the "model" isn't used by this method. There is no "model" or geometry seen by the AI. It's inpainting, that's all. I'm not sure what you think the AI is doing....
