Iron Man 3: New armour shown off at SDCC

Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean do you want the armor to just stay exactly the same forever?

Sort of, I suppose. I'm usually all for change, but stories have a conservative aspect. (Super) Heroes are defined by their abilities, if you change those abilities you do more than add to the story, you change the character itself. Even if it makes sense ; I mean, Peter Parker is a brilliant chemist, he could invent various chemicals to fight crime (venoms, sleeping powder, ...) but no, as Spider-Man, he's just supposed to cling to walls, and swing on his web. Batman could afford all sorts of gadgets like the ones of Stark, but he's all about grappling hooks, batarangs and his car. Superman can travel through space, he could have adventures on other planets or own a spaceship, but he just flies through Metropolis. That's what is expected from them.

It also fits in with the universe just fine. I don't see how the magic and impossible holographic computer and basically human-like AI of Jarvis and the arm thing make sense but brain interface is off-limits, especially since we're probably only years off from that level in the real world.

You have to make a difference between the plausibility of a technology, and its compatibility with the character. Even if it makes sense that such technology would exist, it doesn't mean it would fit the character.
 
And yet a guy that mystically acquires mass and grows twice his size and turns green in seconds is fine, an interdimensional alien with literal space magic who looks exactly like a human is fine, Ant-Man growing and shrinking with unexplainable "Pym Particles" is fine, etc?

I really cannot comprehend how all the other comic book shit that happens like Wolverine's regeneration and even the damn Iron Man suit itself is on a separate level from the bleeding edge armor

And complaining about it is stupid anyway since it happened like a year ago in the comics and this movie is almost definitely using the Extremis armor which is NOT the bone-storage suit

None of this happens in Iron Man 1 (before Marvel decided to make all their movies Avengers prequels), so I fail to see how it's even relevant. Just because even more stupid things happens in comics doesn't make this any less stupid.
 
None of this happens in Iron Man 1 (before Marvel decided to make all their movies Avengers prequels), so I fail to see how it's even relevant. Just because even more stupid things happens in comics doesn't make this any less stupid.

And yet you find a sentient AI with human intelligence to be plausible?
 
I don't think space is going to be a part of the story at all. So far everything in the production points to the movie being about technological espionage in China, with Extremis plot elements thrown in.

China will make an Iron Man suit to go attack US satellites!

Ah so that's why they changed the color pattern. Otherwise the classical red and yellow colors would feel too "Chinese".

Considering Stark almost died when he went into space in the Avengers, it would make sense for him to design a suit for space travel in IM3. Also, it would set up for the cosmic shit that will happen in Avengers 2.

Yep yep.
 
None of this happens in Iron Man 1 (before Marvel decided to make all their movies Avengers prequels), so I fail to see how it's even relevant. Just because even more stupid things happens in comics doesn't make this any less stupid.

It's relevant because that's the universe Iron Man 1 is a part of now. I also think stupider things happening in the comics all the time DOES make it less stupid because it establishes what is plausible within that universe.

Sort of, I suppose. I'm usually all for change, but stories have a conservative aspect. (Super) Heroes are defined by their abilities, if you change those abilities you do more than add to the story, you change the character itself. Even if it makes sense ; I mean, Peter Parker is a brilliant chemist, he could invent various chemicals to fight crime (venoms, sleeping powder, ...) but no, as Spider-Man, he's just supposed to cling to walls, and swing on his web. Batman could afford all sorts of gadgets like the ones of Stark, but he's all about grappling hooks, batarangs and his car. Superman can travel through space, he could have adventures on other planets or own a spaceship, but he just flies through Metropolis. That's what is expected from them.



You have to make a difference between the plausibility of a technology, and its compatibility with the character. Even if it makes sense that such technology would exist, it doesn't mean it would fit the character.

It doesn't change the character because Iron Man's power set isn't "has repulsor blasts and can fly", it's "genius intellect beyond most humans". Since his introduction he has been upgrading his armor, that IS his power, that's the central theme of the comics.

Also, Spider-man DOES invent gadgets and use other things to help fight crime (just recently he used a stealth suit to take down a certain villain), Batman DOES use lots more gadgets than just grappling hooks and batarangs (he has tons of vehicles especially) and Superman DOES fly through space and visit other planets, he's a global superhero, not just Metropolis. Comics constantly change what heroes can do because otherwise it's just boring, you know what they're going to do in every situation before they do it. It may be important for characters to not act out of character, but it's also important for them to evolve and change. I mean if Tony Stark was always thinking "well that's not true to my original suit design" then he would have been destroyed a long time ago.
 
And yet you find a sentient AI with human intelligence to be plausible?

In the world that Iron Man 1 created, sure. Besides the suit and the AI, everything else in Iron Man 1 was relatively grounded. Having a magical suit that is fused to his bones is a different story completely.

I don't see why people can't understand this.
 
Seeing people's about Iron Man's new tech makes me wonder how people will perceive characters like Doctor Strange once they appear on the big screen.


In the world that Iron Man 1 created, sure. Besides the suit and the AI, everything else in Iron Man 1 was relatively grounded. Having a magical suit that is fused to his bones is a different story completely.

I don't see why people can't understand this.


Have you seen the tech in his basement? All of his AI crap? The arc reactor. None of that is grounded. The new suit is not magical either.
 
In the world that Iron Man 1 created, sure. Besides the suit and the AI, everything else in Iron Man 1 was relatively grounded. Having a magical suit that is fused to his bones is a different story completely.

I don't see why people can't understand this.
Maybe you should wait and see how this thing is executed within the film before jumping to conclusions?
 
In the world that Iron Man 1 created, sure. Besides the suit and the AI, everything else in Iron Man 1 was relatively grounded. Having a magical suit that is fused to his bones is a different story completely.

I don't see why people can't understand this.

Again it still doesn't matter because that's not the Extremis suit you're talking about and they're almost certainly not using that in the movie.

Although I'd agree that the Bleeding Edge suit in question does not belong in the movies any time soon, that's not because it doesn't fit in with Iron Man 1, it's because it doesn't really fit in with Avengers. I'm not sure why you're devoted to what does and doesn't fit in with IM1 since the other Marvel movies have already broadly expanded the range of things that can fit in within that universe. It's not like Iron Man 2 and Avengers won't be canon to IM3.
 
It doesn't change the character because Iron Man's power set isn't "has repulsor blasts and can fly", it's "genius intellect beyond most humans". Since his introduction he has been upgrading his armor, that IS his power, that's the central theme of the comics.

Also, Spider-man DOES invent gadgets and use other things to help fight crime (just recently he used a stealth suit to take down a certain villain), Batman DOES use lots more gadgets than just grappling hooks and batarangs (he has tons of vehicles especially) and Superman DOES fly through space and visit other planets, he's a global superhero, not just Metropolis.

I suppose it's a good thing I haven't read recent comics then... Super heroes used to be like modern mythology, now it sounds like soap opera.

Have you seen the tech in his basement? All of his AI crap? The arc reactor. None of that is grounded. The new suit is not magical either.

One of the big success of the movie, in my opinion, was showing all that advanced technology in an old fashioned-way. Stark is painted as a traditional engineer, quite like how it would be imagined in the 60s. Sure he has an AI (that only replaces the human Jarvis, but isn't too important), and he fiddles with holograms, but he still works with his hands, grabs things, experiment, solder, build... The defining element of the "legend of Iron Man" is in its genesis : a man builds a nuclear reactor in a cave. Iron Man is a character of the 60s, like Captain America is one of the 40s, and it's part of their identity.
 
I suppose it's a good thing I haven't read recent comics then... Super heroes used to be like modern mythology, now it sounds like soap opera.

It really is. It's actually been that way for decades. You can thank Iron Man for that, actually, since the Demon in a Bottle story, as well as Spider-man's death of Gwen Stacy, are what kickstarted that trend.
 
Maybe you should wait and see how this thing is executed within the film before jumping to conclusions?
What's this? Good job bob saying that in regards to a Mahvel film? Wha? haha. Just messing with you. I agree with you though. Wait and see how Shane Black handles it. Hell, we don't even know if the Bleeding Edge suit will be in the film. As for the suit, switch colors and it'll be better. Too much gold. Makes him look like a ghost. I like the design though.
 
So knowing that red is such an iconic colour for the character, they decided to have less of it?

Boggles my mind, lol.
 
In the world that Iron Man 1 created, sure. Besides the suit and the AI, everything else in Iron Man 1 was relatively grounded. Having a magical suit that is fused to his bones is a different story completely.

I don't see why people can't understand this.

Everything in Iron Man 1 is pseudo-science. This "magical suit" will be no different.
 
As for my thoughts on the actual suit design: it looks... ok? I highly, highly doubt that's what the final suit from the movie is going to look like. There is no way in hell Marvel would abandon the classic coloring, that's just unheard of from them. Even when they do change character's costumes they go right back to the classic designs in no time at all.

My guess is this is a suit designed for space, even if he doesn't go into space in the movie outside of an intro or something. It was shown in Avengers that the Mk. VII couldn't really handle outer space, so I think this must be made to have that ability, or maybe to go super fast or something. At the least this is SOME kind of specialized suit like the Mk. V suitcase suit and not the next iterative design. The Iron Man suit has been red and gold for so fucking long I can't believe at all that Marvel would ever change it like that. The actual Extremis armor likely won't be revealed until we see the movie and will have a new design looking more like the old designs.
 
Third movie failure, why does anyone think any comic book character will escape it?

Because A) Curses aren't real and B) Most failures are brought about by excessive executive meddling and bad/exhausted directors with shitty, rushed scripts, two problems this movie already is avoiding

Spider-man 3, Superman 3 and X-Men 3 were all shitted out with no regard to quality, the studios in question just wanted the money. Marvel is intent on making all of their movies at least decent and keeping solid quality control so they don't destroy their own brands.
 
Has anyone mentioned that this is just what they're showing at ComicCon and it could be that there will be another greater reveal? I mean its entirely possible no? This could be an armor he wears before he goes full Extremis or bleeding edge etc. Something to consider!
 
Am I the only one who really enjoys the 2nd one? Probably the big difference maker, is that I'm not a big Iron Man fan, but the humor was mostly great and there were some cool action scenes. The story was whatever, but it doesn't fail to entertain. I think the first one's story is overrated anyway, even if its the better of the two.
 
Am I the only one who really enjoys the 2nd one? Probably the big difference maker, is that I'm not a big Iron Man fan, but the humor was mostly great and there were some cool action scenes. The story was whatever, but it doesn't fail to entertain. I think the first one's story is overrated anyway, even if its the better of the two.

It's a solid movie. People really exaggerate how bad it is; even the most "refined" film fans should admit it's at least mediocre. People act like it's straight-up X3 and Spidey 3 levels. It's disappointing compared to the first, sure, but I can't see how it can be called anything worse than "standard summer blockbuster fare". It goes quite a bit off the rails with all the plot elements but it's hardly a clusterfuck.
 
Am I the only one who really enjoys the 2nd one? Probably the big difference maker, is that I'm not a big Iron Man fan, but the humor was mostly great and there were some cool action scenes. The story was whatever, but it doesn't fail to entertain. I think the first one's story is overrated anyway, even if its the better of the two.

I liked it too.
 
Hate that gold so much.

7rGEF.jpg


Still not a fan of that red despite the edit but I think this is loads better.
 
IM3 news:

--Mandarin is the villain
--Rhodey will have a deeper story
--IM3 is a self-contained story but does plant a setup for Avengers 2
--IM3 will have an international element (China)
--Stark and Pepper are in a committed relationship
--Rhodey does wear the Iron Patriot suit as War Machine
 
It's a solid movie. People really exaggerate how bad it is; even the most "refined" film fans should admit it's at least mediocre. People act like it's straight-up X3 and Spidey 3 levels. It's disappointing compared to the first, sure, but I can't see how it can be called anything worse than "standard summer blockbuster fare". It goes quite a bit off the rails with all the plot elements but it's hardly a clusterfuck.
Nope, I like it a lot. I think that in many ways its a stronger film then the first (although the first nails the origin story better then just about any other superhero film)
 
Looks good, and will look even better when it's actually on screen in the setting it was designed for and not on a shitty stage demonstration. This stuff never looks as good as it does on screen when it's out of its context.
 
IM3 news:

--Mandarin is the villain
--Rhodey will have a deeper story
--IM3 is a self-contained story but does plant a setup for Avengers 2
--IM3 will have an international element (China)
--Stark and Pepper are in a committed relationship
--Rhodey does wear the Iron Patriot suit as War Machine

YESSSS, Mandarin!

Eh to everything else.
 
IM3 news:

--Mandarin is the villain
--Rhodey will have a deeper story
--IM3 is a self-contained story but does plant a setup for Avengers 2
--IM3 will have an international element (China)
--Stark and Pepper are in a committed relationship
--Rhodey does wear the Iron Patriot suit as War Machine
...are you from the future? The Liveblog just started.
 
Silver gives off a cold, robotic feel which is the opposite of what they're going for with the pale color.

That's why the red would need to be changed to a warmer more saturated red. This looks really weird but I'd prefer to see something like this than their current cold boring red plus tacky gold.

KTPGq.jpg
 
I always start to get bored and lose interest rapidly the moment "international element" type things start happening. Like when all these countries start to get involved and they rely on that itself instead of the writing and whatnot to give the intended mood. That sort of real like situation never really translates well into movies, not on its own. Eh...maybe I'm losing it lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom