Plenty of crappy custom roms have the clock in the middle. I usually refuse to flash any rom has that middle clock shit.
Most of them have an option to move it since most roms are CM10/AOKP based

Plenty of crappy custom roms have the clock in the middle. I usually refuse to flash any rom has that middle clock shit.
You guys, what if that's a screenshot of the new notification bar?
I hate being skeptcial too, but maybe they took community feedback and got a centered clock. Google Now Interface looks a little different as well.
Verizon's minimum advertised price list lays out the lowest price that Verizon will allow a third party reseller to advertise a device for. It allows Big Red to have some control over resellers pricing decisions. The MAP list is also a good source of information and in the past it has revealed launch dates and pricing information. Now, Verizon's latest MAP list gives us the name that Big Red will be calling one of its most eagerly awaited devices.
We've seen the HTC 6435LVW go from a rumored device to an actual phone ready to be launched. We also have seen the name of the device go from the HTC DIx (Droid Incredible X) to the HTC DLX (pronounced Deluxe) to the latest moniker courtesy of Verizon's MAP list. According to a leaked copy of the list, the 5 inch phablet from HTC will be known as the HTC DROID DNA. The MAP price, which is often the actual two-year contract price, is $199.99 and a possible November 20th launch date dovetails with earlier word that the phablet would launch around Thanksgiving. Last month, we called the device the first DROID phablet.
Also on the MAP list we can see that the Samsung GALAXY Note II appears ready to launch today in silver or black, at a price of $299.99 with a two-year pact. No surprise there. In addition, we can see a couple of Windows Phone 8 models including the HTC Windows Phone 8X. Just the other day we showed you the phone being tested on the Verizon network. According to the MAP, that phone will be available in blue, black or red at $199.99 on contract, starting November 12th. The Nokia Lumia 822 apparently will also launch on Verizon the same day in grey or white for $99.99.
It also looks like the Samsung Galaxy S III will soon be available in different colors, Amber Brown and Black. Just remember that the MAP list isn't supposed to reveal pricing and launch dates of future devices although it has done a good job at predicting these in the past.
yeah I posted a bunch of quotes a bit back from different reviews on battery life for the optimus G, they seem very positive. No longer a concern for me. Now...we wait.GSMArena have posted up their full Optimus G battery tests. Interestingly they comment how the Web browsing time (5hrs 15mins) was almost the same as the Galaxy S 3 on ICS, although moving to JB gave the S3 an extra hour. Good signs for Nexus 4 which will be on 4.2 without any sort of skinning/custom browser.
Roll on Monday.
http://blog.gsmarena.com/lg-optimus-...e-the-results/
yeah I posted a bunch of quotes a bit back from different reviews on battery life for the optimus G, they seem very positive. No longer a concern for me. Now...we wait.
yeah I posted a bunch of quotes a bit back from different reviews on battery life for the optimus G, they seem very positive. No longer a concern for me. Now...we wait.
that's pretty interesting. So the main point here is that they made the battery seem worse than it is, if I'm reading it right?This is what I was referring to when I mentioned people complaining about the testing methodology:
http://blog.gsmarena.com/lg-optimus-...large-battery/ (comments):
"we all know that the screen consumes most of the battery,
and the term "50%" is very arbitrary, says it's ~200nits for HTC One X, ~350nits for LG or ~175nits for Samsung (all are rough number) and also sometimes even the phone says 50% but indeed it's 30%, so it's kinda unfair ...
I suggest a fairer method, since you (gsmarena) already had the brightness meter (I assume), you guys just set the phone to the same brightness, say 250nits, then do the all test again, then produce the same chart with the statement that these are conducted with 250nits brightness ...
Hopefully, this helps"
-------------------------------------------
"The LG has 80% higher brightness at 50% brightness than the one X so how on earth is this a valid comparison? Your own tests show the one X at 50% brightness is 200nits bright whereas the LG is 369nits bright. GSMArena your battery tests lose all credibility when you let such loopholes unaddressed. Your battery test methodology if officially invalid I never quite paid attention how gravely flawed it is and I am surprised you guys decided to be lazy and ignored this fatal flaw.
It's all good and fine when phones are "similarly bright" at 50% brightness but that is not the case at all here."
that's pretty interesting. So the main point here is that they made the battery seem worse than it is, if I'm reading it right?
I forgot to check for the brightness levels, the crappy max brightness level of the GN is one thing I've never been happy with. For comparison's sake (brightness measured in cd/m2:
Galaxy Nexus
50% - 112
100% 247
Optimus G
50% - 197
100% - 417
One X
50% - 200
100% - 550
S3
50% - 174
100% - 330
My default level of brightness for the GN is 30%, so its going to be even lower again for the Optimus G. Huzzah!
I've got a Sony Xperia T and am liking it a lot, but I don't really understand how Android manages SD cards. I have a 32 GB card inserted into it, but it seems to put everything onto the phone memory itself. Is there any way to automatically install every new app directly on the SD card without having to move them manually?
No one knows how the crappy SD cards work. That's why I want them gone.
I've gone from trying to have most things on my microSD to just storing music and videos on it.
No one knows how the crappy SD cards work. That's why I want them gone.
Yeah, that's why I mainly want an SD card slot on phones. About 70% of my phoen storage right now is music and it's really hard managing what should be in the phone and not.
http://www.droiddog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/VerizonGalaxyNoteII.png
Enjoy your Verizon Galaxy Note II, powered by Verizon's 4G LTE Network
Verizon
Guys, help me out bad here. I have the Nova Launcher on my S3 and I cannot for the life of me to get the wallpaper to scroll when I swipe through home screens. The photo I have is wide enough for the three screens and the crop cuts it out.
![]()
Enjoy your Verizon Galaxy Note II, powered by Verizon's 4G LTE Network
Verizon
Plenty of crappy custom roms have the clock in the middle. I usually refuse to flash any rom has that middle clock shit.
Motorola Mobility Android Engineering
Below are the authorizations an unauthorized/pending of Motorola phones to receive android 4.2.2 (code name) Key Lime Pie
Motorola Nexus: Authorized Reason: Being shipped with 4.2.2
The above documents have be reviewed and authorized/Pending authorization and are subject to change by VP product Management.
nova settings > desktop > wallpaper scrolling
enabled?
meh, I'll believe it when I see it at this point. Too many douches faking things in the android world these days.
So confused. If I use a photo I have and set to wallpaper, it doesn't scroll. I download a different one off Zedge and it works.
So, I want to buy myself Xperia T. I read some reviews, and they state, that this Xperia has some kind of screen protector which is already applied to the screen. I'm not a fan of those things, I just like to have a screen without of any protectors.
So, my question is: Can I safely remove that screen protector? I tried to search on google, but I only saw Xperia Arc threads, where some people wrote, that after taking off that fabric screen protector, their screens started to act crazy. Are they trolling or is it really the case?
Don't remove it. Sony places these on their phones, they're barely noticeable. At the least can you play with one before you buy it?
So, I want to buy myself Xperia T. I read some reviews, and they state, that this Xperia has some kind of screen protector which is already applied to the screen. I'm not a fan of those things, I just like to have a screen without of any protectors.
So, my question is: Can I safely remove that screen protector? I tried to search on google, but I only saw Xperia Arc threads, where some people wrote, that after taking off that fabric screen protector, their screens started to act crazy. Are they trolling or is it really the case?
What I do for the 720p phones like the Nexus, One X, and GS3 is
1)download wallbase app
2) set it to the highest resolution they have
3) chose a picture where most of the info is centered
4) set as wallpaper
It'll crop the image, but it only cuts out the sides. Top to bottom everything is there so you just have to find an image where stuff is centered.
Maybe you can sand it off
Downloading now
![]()
Enjoy your Verizon Galaxy Note II, powered by Verizon's 4G LTE Network
Verizon
Another render of the Nexus 4:
That is fugly. It's bad enough they put their big ugly logo on all their phones, but to put it on the button because there is no room on the bezel? That's taking it it to another level. You are gonna hear people call it the Verizon button instead of the home button. lol.
But curious enough, I have a co-worker who was able to get a Verizon Droid Razr from Costco without the Verizon Logo. Not sure how that happened.
You can put one of these on it.
![]()
What is that? Looks like a jewel or some purple gunk. What I would do is see if I can find a replacement button and swap it out. Freakin Verizon.