Edge: PS4 to launch in Europe in early 2014, US/JP 2013, more powerful than next Xbox

6 GB of GDDR5 would be pretty amazing, what's the word on the RAM situation atm? Too late to add DDR3 (mobo design/heat/architecture issues), so I guess adding more GDDR5 is the only solution?
 
I'm a little nervous about the controller. The article sai redesigned but the same size as te current controller. I personally believe the 360 controller is te best that's ever been made and I'm hoping Sony does something really different then the current DS3. The share button does have me damn excited though
 
no matter what, North America has to go first. They are the most consumer hungry market out of the regions that actually buys stuff despite of economic hardships.

Better release before Blackfriday and see madness next November lol

I think its more that they would sell out all their stock in Europe alone before NA conumers have a chance to get their wallets out
so limited stock - release in US
build up stock & hit europe for massive damage
 
Well, based on PS3's six years of system sales; NA - 22 million, EU+UK - 37 million (32/5), I'd say it's obvious the european continent is more profitable for Sony. There's no way 22 million users would buy more than 37 million.

Not only that, they can actually reach 50m in PAL region with a price point of 150$ish. I mean PS3 is like the only system that sells in places like middle east, korea, singapore and so on

SONY should focus more on euro zone for their next system. Had it not been for europe , ps3 would have been history by now
 
6 GB of GDDR5 would be pretty amazing, what's the word on the RAM situation atm? Too late to add DDR3 (mobo design/heat/architecture issues), so I guess adding more GDDR5 is the only solution?

Yes, unless they have two prototypes. One with GDDR5 and another with stacked DDR3/4 designed to provide the same bandwidth to the GPU. The assertion about the possibility of 8GB could be lent a touch more credence provided the earlier rumour of Sony sending out two dev kit, one of which had 16GB RAM was true.

If they are planning to stick to GDDR5 however, I do not see them going over 4GB in general and at most 5GB (an unusual number possible with two 512MB chips) which would allow the RAM available for games be either 4GB or 4.5GB depending upon the final size of OS.
 
I can't wait to see what Durango's actual RAM situation really is. Anyone who thinks MS is going to let Sony completely dominate them in the memory department has another thing coming.

It is no coincidence that MS has been working so closely with Epic, Crytek and all the other RAM whores for building their next-gen system from the ground up.

I expect both systems to have extremely similar performance, albeit achieved in a slightly different way.
 
nextgen console with 8GB will inevitably have a big OS pool
i think devkit can use OS pool for dev tools, big OS pool is manly empty buffers

sounds all right, since a lot of memory should be sitting around doing nothing.

Sony will use 4 GB for sure, i hope they wont do 8 GB (and I am sure they wont).
 
I can't wait to see what Durango's actual RAM situation really is. Anyone who thinks MS is going to let Sony completely dominate them in the memory department has another thing coming.

It is no coincidence that MS has been working so closely with Epic, Crytek and all the other RAM whores for building their next-gen system from the ground up.

I expect both systems to have extremely similar performance, albeit achieved in a slightly different way.

Yup
 
What's up with all the sudden Kaz avatars? anyways it's too late to up the RAM IMO I guess Sony is referring to lowering the OS footprint and improving the PS4's dev tools so that the devs can utilize as much of the RAM as possible.
 
Could the PS4 launch in early October in order to have a second wave of consoles produced before Black Friday? I don't know much about how long it would take to make a new console.
 
What's up with all the sudden Kaz avatars? anyways it's too late to up the RAM IMO I guess Sony is referring to lowering the OS footprint and improving the PS4's dev tools so that the devs can utilize as much of the RAM as possible.

didn't the 360 up the ram at the last minute?

it would be nice just from a hardcore gamer perspective, but 4 gigs of GDDR5 is way more than anyone will need to make great games- it's only good for future proofing. But who here wants the ps4 sticking around more than 5 years anyway? I don't want to repeat this gen again ever- it went on long enough.

4 gigs of GDDR5, get it out the door, and give me Ps5 in 2018 or 2019.
 
If it can add even 2GB of GDDR5 RAM, bringing the total up to 6GB, then they will pretty much blow the Durante out of the water.

Blow me where?

Jimmy-Durante-9282022-1-402.jpg
 
didn't the 360 up the ram at the last minute?

it would be nice just from a hardcore gamer perspective, but 4 gigs of GDDR5 is way more than anyone will need to make great games- it's only good for future proofing. But who here wants the ps4 sticking around more than 5 years anyway? I don't want to repeat this gen again ever- it went on long enough.

4 gigs of GDDR5, get it out the door, and give me Ps5 in 2018 or 2019.
Yeah but it's best to believe Sony wouldn't want to make such a last minute move and risk a delay or bad yields since the Durango and Orbis are both rumored to be pretty much the same damn thing spec wise.
 
this is where I fear sony may have jumped the gun a little. announcing a new console so soon, could see their ps3 sales falter considerably and when your next gen machine isn't out for upwards of 9 months (or less / move), that's never a good thing to happen.

Nah, it's not the same target audience. The people currently buying PS3s are not looking to buy a PS4 any time soon. PS2 sales didn't drop off a cliff after 2005 when PS3 was announced, in fact Xmas 2005 was one of the strongest ever for PS2!

If Sony get the strategy right and push a price cut at E3 for PS3 and announce PS4 with no b/c in built then PS3 sales aren't really going to suffer.
 
didn't the 360 up the ram at the last minute?

it would be nice just from a hardcore gamer perspective, but 4 gigs of GDDR5 is way more than anyone will need to make great games- it's only good for future proofing. But who here wants the ps4 sticking around more than 5 years anyway? I don't want to repeat this gen again ever- it went on long enough.

4 gigs of GDDR5, get it out the door, and give me Ps5 in 2018 or 2019.

PCs are being replaced by tablets and major PC CPU manufacturers like Intel/amd would want to deter the the paradigm shift by coming up with beefed up CPU/GPU specs in the future

4g wont be enough if SONY is pushing 4K and SONY always has the habit of pushing a new tech with their console releases

with 8g GDDR5, they can dominate gaming scenario for years and also they can fortify their goals of making people switch to 4K TVs
 
Nah, it's not the same target audience. The people currently buying PS3s are not looking to buy a PS4 any time soon. PS2 sales didn't drop off a cliff after 2005 when PS3 was announced, in fact Xmas 2005 was one of the strongest ever for PS2!

If Sony get the strategy right and push a price cut at E3 for PS3 and announce PS4 with no b/c in built then PS3 sales aren't really going to suffer.

agreed. there's a huge market of people interested in the PS3 that won't hop on board until it hits $99-$150. a price drop combined with the ps4 announcement likely means sony sells more consoles, not less.
 
Well, based on PS3's six years of system sales; NA - 22 million, EU+UK - 37 million (32/5), I'd say it's obvious the european continent is more profitable for Sony. There's no way 22 million users would buy more than 37 million.

True, but the NA market is where Sony is most at risk. They lost a lot of ground here against Microsoft and Nintendo, and I'm sure they really want the PS4 to take some of that back. Even with the delay, they'll be fine in Europe. UK (51st state :p) is the only country where they didn't do as well or better than MS.

Edit: as for 4k, don't expect games to run at that resolution unless they're smaller PSN games that don't need a lot of power. 4k will probably be just for movies.
 
I can't wait to see what Durango's actual RAM situation really is. Anyone who thinks MS is going to let Sony completely dominate them in the memory department has another thing coming.

It is no coincidence that MS has been working so closely with Epic, Crytek and all the other RAM whores for building their next-gen system from the ground up.

I expect both systems to have extremely similar performance, albeit achieved in a slightly different way.

Link?
 
PCs are being replaced by tablets and major PC CPU manufacturers like Intel/amd would want to deter the the paradigm shift by coming up with beefed up CPU/GPU specs in the future

4g wont be enough if SONY is pushing 4K and SONY always has the habit of pushing a new tech with their console releases

with 8g GDDR5, they can dominate gaming scenario for years and also they can fortify their goals of making people switch to 4K TVs

4gigs of GDDR5 is more than enough for 4K gaming and video.

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2012/6/18/the-4k-graphics-card-shootout.aspx

and that's on a gaming PC. On a closed system where you can squeeze every last ounce of performance out of your hardware, performance would likely be even better.
 
Uh, both the Playstation and the Playstation 2 had delayed launches in the US that missed Christmas. The original Playstation ended up delayed like 9 mo. They did alright.

PS1 launched in September and PS2 launched in October. All home systems in the US in the last 20 years have launched in September, October, or November. The last home system that didn't launch in those three months in the US was the Sega Saturn and we all know how that turned out.
 
4gigs of GDDR5 is more than enough for 4K gaming and video.

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2012/6/18/the-4k-graphics-card-shootout.aspx

and that's on a gaming PC. On a closed system where you can squeeze every last ounce of performance out of your hardware, performance would likely be even better.

And more importantly, gaming@4K on PS4 would be nearly non existent. It is primarily for 4K video.

Resolution @dynamic 1080p and framerate either 30 or 60 means a lot can be done with optimization.
 
PS1 launched in September and PS2 launched in October. All home systems in the US in the last 20 years have launched in September, October, or November. The last home system that didn't launch in those three months in the US was the Sega Saturn and we all know how that turned out.

PS1 was a December 3rd launch held back until the next September for the US.
 
I could be wrong but I remember reading here that 4 GB of GDDR5 memory wasn't even possible in consoles until this year duo to motherboards capacity or something like. 8 GB of GDDR5 will be very hard to achieve.
 
cost between the two?

IIRC, it will be around $15 (maximum) per GB of GDDR5. Problem is that it is not as simple as that. Heat dissipation system and integrating them to an already crowded motherboard would add to the cost to a point where the venture may be seen as prohibitive. Still, you never know what Sony really intends to do.

I could be wrong but I remember reading here that 4 GB of GDDR5 memory wasn't even possible in consoles until this year duo to motherboards capacity or something like. 8 GB of GDDR5 will be very hard to achieve.

No. It had to do with density going up per chip from 256MB to 512MB
 
4gigs of GDDR5 is more than enough for 4K gaming and video.

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2012/6/18/the-4k-graphics-card-shootout.aspx

and that's on a gaming PC. On a closed system where you can squeeze every last ounce of performance out of your hardware, performance would likely be even better.

that might be true since consoles are closed system but what if you want to have ultrarealistic graphics with 1000s of things on screen???

the link you specified took into consideration the games which have been released already like BF3 and none of those games were made with 4k res specifically in mind

To make a console future proof, i think SONY should add another 4g ram . after all they are not making huge investments on GPU/CPU /media like BD when ps3 came out

The only region where they would be making investments would be a motherfucking for incorporating 16 nodules of GDDR5 and an additional 4g GDDR which might cost them an extra 40$-60$
 
So they will need to up the chips again to 1gig per each for 8GB right? Is that even possible?

with the clamshell mode and 16bit mode of GDDR5 chip you can simulate 1GB 32bit chip with two 512MB chip (front side and back side PCB) without modify memory controller or PCB print. it seem you can twice the RAM capacity at the last moment
 
IIRC, it will be around $15 (maximum) per GB of GDDR5. Problem is that it is not as simple as that. Heat dissipation system and integrating them to an already crowded motherboard would add to the cost to a point where the venture may be seen as prohibitive. Still, you never know what Sony really intends to do.



No. It had to do with density going up per chip from 256MB to 512MB

Is it a situation where stacking would solve the layout/thermal issues?
 
that might be true since consoles are closed system but what if you want to have ultrarealistic graphics with 1000s of things on screen???

the link you specified took into consideration the games which have been released already like BF3 and none of those games were made with 4k res specifically in mind

To make a console future proof, i think SONY should add another 4g ram . after all they are not making huge investments on GPU/CPU /media like BD when ps3 came out

The only region where they would be making investments would be a motherfucking for incorporating 16 nodules of GDDR5 and an additional 4g GDDR which might cost them an extra 40$-60$

thats like having 16 GB of RAM in gaming PC just because you can... doesnt make it usable :-)

there is no need to spend extra $50-$80 on 8 GB of ram... it is throwing money into the wind. It can cause slower sales of PS4 for instance and make Sony lose billions.

I guess people who dont understand technical side of things end up thinking that bigger is better... but it is better to spend money on other things or making your console cheaper.

$60 would probably double the graphic power of the PS4.
 
Microsoft just issued a response to Polygon in regard to Sony's February 20 event:

We welcome innovation in the category. It's an amazing time for the industry, and an even better time for Xbox 360 owners. At Xbox, we're focused on making the content you love even more amazing including blockbuster games, and new entertainment experiences. We're always thinking about what's next for our platform, but we don't have anything further to share at this time.

So basically 360 > PS4?
 
Top Bottom