Arsenic Yellow
Member
Unfortunately, I think nohomo is becoming the accepted compromise word/phrase these days.
According to this thread it is :/. Change the word "Homo" with any other minority group and maybe they'd' see how it's offensive.
Unfortunately, I think nohomo is becoming the accepted compromise word/phrase these days.
They were individually printed out smh.That's fucked up, man. Who knew you could even buy stickers like that?
Exactly. I mean, if you're not gay - great. Do your thing. But it shouldn't be seen as something you need to clarify or else *shock horror* a gatling gun that fires hard cocks is going to be aimed directly into your face.By having to clarify that you're not gay when doing/saying something, you're implying that you are uncomfortable being seen as gay and that it is a negative thing.
Is it really necessary, though? That is the part that I don't get. I've never come across a situation where I felt it was necessary to remind someone of my heterosexuality. Even when gay men flirt with me. Its pretty obvious that they know I am not interested and that I am not gay. So I just say I'm not interested.
I think this is pretty straightforward. A person says "no homo" when they are doing something that could conceivably have someone mistake them as a gay man, and saying "no homo" indicates that that person does not want that mistake to happen. I don't think it is "hate speech", but it is crass and gratuitous to point out at every opportunity that one is not gay, because Heaven forbid someone think that you're anything but straight.
Yeah that works but because you receive the flirt... if you do something that may seem an attempt to flirt but in reality you don't you just make sure that he/she knows it.
so this means 'that's what she said' is now sexist....right?
Hey Bish, what do you teach?
No. I think the embarrassment of being called out in front of the class regarding workplace professionalism was enough.
College-age, early to mid-20s. Graduate course in Game Design.
1st page:
Yeah that works but because you receive the flirt... if you do something that may seem an attempt to flirt but in reality you don't you just make sure that he/she knows it.
so this means 'that's what she said' is now sexist....right?
Ok. However, is a box of chocolates, in this context, a flirt? He handed out candy to the whole class. How could anyone possibly interpret this to be a sexual advance?
Because it was in a heart shaped box, close to valentines day.
That said, I still think it was immature and crass - the phrase feels much more innocent when it doesn't look so forced like this example.
Because it was in a heart shaped box, close to valentines day.
That said, I still think it was immature and crass - the phrase feels much more innocent when it doesn't look so forced like this example.
It was just a joke. Don't see why there was a reason to "lit someone up" because of that.
Pause.
Phrase is way, way older than Boondocks.
Who fucking does something like this when they're 20+?
For someone saying it shouldnt matter whether youre confused for being gay, you seem to be pretty adamant in telling us that giving someone heart shaped candy isnt gay.Yeah, I still don't buy it. I mentioned this earlier, but I buy heart shaped candy for my grandmother. I've also passed around whatever cheap box was on sale, around the office. Many times it was in a heart shaped box. I never felt that I had to make clear to my male colleagues that I was straight as I handed them a chocolate from the box.
Oh no, you have to tell someone that your friendly gesture was just that. God forbid we have social interaction! You're in an odd state of mind when you're nervous that every action you take might be misinterpreted so that you head it off with disclaimers.
Ok. However, is a box of chocolates, in this context, a flirt? He handed out candy to the whole class. How could anyone possibly interpret this to be a sexual advance?
edit: and what Alucrid said.
Wanna lit me up?
So no, I'm not overly PC. I crack race and sex jokes with my friends that I know and know me. I also respect the boundaries of time and place and fully expect that someone over the age of seven should and would know better. When you're getting ready to start your career? Fucking rights you should know better. So there you have it.
For someone saying it shouldnt matter whether youre confused for being gay, you seem to be pretty adamant in telling us that giving someone heart shaped candy isnt gay.
A lot more than you probably realize... most people still haven't figured out much even by their mid to late 20'sWho fucking does something like this when they're 20+?
Is the term "no homo" homophobic?
Is the guy just poking the other kid or stabbing him? Not quite sure whats going on.
Among other things i would never use no homo if not when joking with friends because i know there are hypersensitive people where you have to watch every single letter before saying anything.
"Hey what you said was offensive for me even though its litteral meaning isn't and you didn't say it to offend me neither so stop using it because i am offended"
"Well guess who has a problem me or you?"
Serious question here;
Would it have been different if a poster on GAF said "No homo"? Do we hold the internet to do a different set of standards?
I dunno, you tell me. How would it be sexist?
I think this is pretty straightforward. A person says "no homo" when they are doing something that could conceivably have someone mistake them as a gay man, and saying "no homo" indicates that that person does not want that mistake to happen. I don't think it is "hate speech", but it is crass and gratuitous to point out at every opportunity that one is not gay, because Heaven forbid someone think that you're anything but straight.
That's why I always say "No homo" while winking and squeezing their knee.