I lit up one of my graduate students...

Status
Not open for further replies.
No homo always struck me as literally homophobic. I'm going to say something fairly positive about you, but I have to slip in this caveat at the end because I can't stand the thought that you might think I'm a homosexual.


Not as big a deal as a lot of things, but yeah I've got no problem with adjusting the attitude of someone that does that in a classroom setting.
 
it1WDyMivvcyk.gif
 
That's fucked up, man. Who knew you could even buy stickers like that?
They were individually printed out smh.

By having to clarify that you're not gay when doing/saying something, you're implying that you are uncomfortable being seen as gay and that it is a negative thing.
Exactly. I mean, if you're not gay - great. Do your thing. But it shouldn't be seen as something you need to clarify or else *shock horror* a gatling gun that fires hard cocks is going to be aimed directly into your face.

If one of my kids turned out to be gay, how would I feel for him as a parent if something like this occurred in his class and nobody said anything? That somehow, he's less of a person because of who he is - not hurting anyone, mind - and other people need to make that distinction that they're not like him (but hey, no offense!).

It would break my heart.

So no, I'm not overly PC. I crack race and sex jokes with my friends that I know and know me. I also respect the boundaries of time and place and fully expect that someone over the age of seven should and would know better. When you're getting ready to start your career? Fucking rights you should know better. So there you have it.
 
I think this is pretty straightforward. A person says "no homo" when they are doing something that could conceivably have someone mistake them as a gay man, and saying "no homo" indicates that that person does not want that mistake to happen. I don't think it is "hate speech", but it is crass and gratuitous to point out at every opportunity that one is not gay, because Heaven forbid someone think that you're anything but straight.
 
Is it really necessary, though? That is the part that I don't get. I've never come across a situation where I felt it was necessary to remind someone of my heterosexuality. Even when gay men flirt with me. Its pretty obvious that they know I am not interested and that I am not gay. So I just say I'm not interested.

Yeah that works but because you receive the flirt... if you do something that may seem an attempt to flirt but in reality you don't you just make sure that he/she knows it.
 
I think this is pretty straightforward. A person says "no homo" when they are doing something that could conceivably have someone mistake them as a gay man, and saying "no homo" indicates that that person does not want that mistake to happen. I don't think it is "hate speech", but it is crass and gratuitous to point out at every opportunity that one is not gay, because Heaven forbid someone think that you're anything but straight.

Just what I said!

*brofist*

fooledyou
 
Yeah that works but because you receive the flirt... if you do something that may seem an attempt to flirt but in reality you don't you just make sure that he/she knows it.

Oh no, you have to tell someone that your friendly gesture was just that. God forbid we have social interaction! You're in an odd state of mind when you're nervous that every action you take might be misinterpreted so that you head it off with disclaimers.
 
Yeah that works but because you receive the flirt... if you do something that may seem an attempt to flirt but in reality you don't you just make sure that he/she knows it.

Ok. However, is a box of chocolates, in this context, a flirt? He handed out candy to the whole class. How could anyone possibly interpret this to be a sexual advance?

edit: and what Alucrid said.
 
Ok. However, is a box of chocolates, in this context, a flirt? He handed out candy to the whole class. How could anyone possibly interpret this to be a sexual advance?

Because it was in a heart shaped box, close to valentines day.

That said, I still think it was immature and crass - the phrase feels much more innocent when it doesn't look so forced like this example.
 
Because it was in a heart shaped box, close to valentines day.

That said, I still think it was immature and crass - the phrase feels much more innocent when it doesn't look so forced like this example.

Yeah, I still don't buy it. I mentioned this earlier, but I buy heart shaped candy for my grandmother. I've also passed around whatever cheap box was on sale, around the office. Many times it was in a heart shaped box. I never felt that I had to make clear to my male colleagues that I was straight as I handed them a chocolate from the box.

I do agree that in this case it was pretty crude.
 
Because it was in a heart shaped box, close to valentines day.

That said, I still think it was immature and crass - the phrase feels much more innocent when it doesn't look so forced like this example.

I'm pretty sure in grade school we gave valentines to everyone. Who cares? If they're taking a heart shaped candy as an advance then they need to learn some social cues as much as this guy who passed them out.

It was just a joke. Don't see why there was a reason to "lit someone up" because of that.

Who fucking does something like this when they're 20+?
 
Yeah, I still don't buy it. I mentioned this earlier, but I buy heart shaped candy for my grandmother. I've also passed around whatever cheap box was on sale, around the office. Many times it was in a heart shaped box. I never felt that I had to make clear to my male colleagues that I was straight as I handed them a chocolate from the box.
For someone saying it shouldnt matter whether youre confused for being gay, you seem to be pretty adamant in telling us that giving someone heart shaped candy isnt gay.
 
Oh no, you have to tell someone that your friendly gesture was just that. God forbid we have social interaction! You're in an odd state of mind when you're nervous that every action you take might be misinterpreted so that you head it off with disclaimers.

Ok. However, is a box of chocolates, in this context, a flirt? He handed out candy to the whole class. How could anyone possibly interpret this to be a sexual advance?

edit: and what Alucrid said.

There are gestures and gestures... there is keeping the door open for a person and gifting them a ring with diamonds only one of those has the higher chance of double meaning... And i think that anyone can agree that an heart shaped chocolate box very close to Valentine day is at the very least suspect...

---

Among other things i would never use no homo if not when joking with friends because i know there are hypersensitive people where you have to watch every single letter before saying anything.

"Hey what you said was offensive for me even though its litteral meaning isn't and you didn't say it to offend me neither so stop using it because i am offended"
"Well guess who has a problem me or you?"
 
So no, I'm not overly PC. I crack race and sex jokes with my friends that I know and know me. I also respect the boundaries of time and place and fully expect that someone over the age of seven should and would know better. When you're getting ready to start your career? Fucking rights you should know better. So there you have it.

But who has the power to ban the Bish?!

<3
 
For someone saying it shouldnt matter whether youre confused for being gay, you seem to be pretty adamant in telling us that giving someone heart shaped candy isnt gay.

I don't see anything contradictory in this.

1) I think its odd that someone might confuse chocolates for a sexual advance, in this context.

2) I think its odd that someone might insist on reminding people that they are straight when they give chocolates.
 
Among other things i would never use no homo if not when joking with friends because i know there are hypersensitive people where you have to watch every single letter before saying anything.

"Hey what you said was offensive for me even though its litteral meaning isn't and you didn't say it to offend me neither so stop using it because i am offended"
"Well guess who has a problem me or you?"

This is pretty much how I see it as well.
 
Serious question here;

Would it have been different if a poster on GAF said "No homo"? Do we hold the internet to do a different set of standards?

I'm fairly new around here so I can speak to the moderation side of things but there's definitely a different set of standards with regards to the internet. Bish is a Teacher. It's his job not only to impart the knowledge of the subject but, when necessary, to teach his students what's expected of them as people when in a serious/work environment. If he were to allow that action to occur without addressing it he's sending a message and he's failing in the responsibilities of his role.


It's different on GAF. Even if it's a bannable offense there's no onus on the mods to try to explain to you why it's wrong. They're not here to babysit you or teach you right from wrong, acceptable from unacceptable. They're literally here to keep order. If a person wants to say whatever ignorant crap, they catch a ban and that's it. They can learn life lessons on their own in their personal lives.
 
I dunno, you tell me. How would it be sexist?

I'm just pointing out how assumptions, like how 'no homo' is always homophobic, can lead us to strange places. The 'no homo' discussed in your video, and 'that's what she said' are really quite similar, word play games that happen to rely on a particular sexuality.

The 'no homo' bish brought up though is quite different. It is not so much a game and may in fact come from a darker place. As your video said, take everything on a case by case basis.

Either way, handing out those chocolates to a class is completely inappropriate.
 
I don't know the dynamic of your class and how well they know each other. Sounds like it could have been insensitive or it could have been a joke/teasing.

"the only way I could salvage the class" A little dramatic, don't you think?
 
I think this is pretty straightforward. A person says "no homo" when they are doing something that could conceivably have someone mistake them as a gay man, and saying "no homo" indicates that that person does not want that mistake to happen. I don't think it is "hate speech", but it is crass and gratuitous to point out at every opportunity that one is not gay, because Heaven forbid someone think that you're anything but straight.

That's why I always say "No homo" while winking and squeezing their knee.
 
That's why I always say "No homo" while winking and squeezing their knee.

Usually after they say no homo we end up staring into each others eyes until we slowly move forward, closer and closer until our lips almost touch, then the magic of the "no homo" takes effect and we just slap each other on the ass and go our separate way with our heart shaped chocolates.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom