I lit up one of my graduate students...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Agreed, and under normal circumstances (habitual lateness, missing assignments, etc), I talk with students one-on-one. That wouldn't have been sufficient tonight since

- he had already passed them out to half the class before offering one to me
- not making it abundantly clear to everyone who received it that it wasn't cool would come off as tacit approval


That's fine then you seem like a kind honest teacher. And in this case maybe other people will talk about this and not pull these shenanigans in your class or other classes (and possibly learn from it).
 
I don't blame OP for doing that at all, but it's never worth it to lose your cool. Dude probably was so sheltered/in a bubble that he honestly didn't think there was anything offensive about "no homo." Not that I think about it, I've heard a friend of a friend talk about how they were taken aback when someone got pissed at them for saying it.

That does not make it okay, of course, but it's understandable if they've been surrounded by usage of that term for a long time. It would've been better to just give a calm, stern talk.

I dont think Bish snapped him by the collar, through him down and curb stomped him.
 
Isn't that what 'lit up' means? Or is it to get high?

It usually means somebody got knocked out. Back around the late 90's, I would hear "Got lit" used for getting high, but I personally never heard 'lit up' for anything other than getting your bell rung, but I'm certain it's used for getting high, as well.
 
I like teaching but I don't know how people do it full time. Rewarding but really hard work.

At least you're teaching college students who actually give a fuck about learning(well, most of them). I couldn't imagine teaching high school where most kids don't give a fuck about school.
 
Is the student going to be able to make it to Indie3?!

Edit: To the people saying that this is an over reaction on Bish's part, it really isn't. I've seen these classes, some of these guys need to hear this stuff straight up.
 
I think this is pretty straightforward. A person says "no homo" when they are doing something that could conceivably have someone mistake them as a gay man, and saying "no homo" indicates that that person does not want that mistake to happen. I don't think it is "hate speech", but it is crass and gratuitous to point out at every opportunity that one is not gay, because Heaven forbid someone think that you're anything but straight.

That's why I always say "No homo" while winking and squeezing their knee.

You guys laugh but I lost a friend this way, we were out in the city bar hopping and at one point I grabbed his knee and winked at him jokingly. (It was in context to some joke he made) but I guess It didn't come off that way because the look on his face said "I've made a huge mistake o_o", he dissapears off somewhere and I don't see him till the next day. I even went to his place the next day to try and clear the air but he couldn't even look me in the eyes he was so traumatized ha
 
I thing the term is a bit hostile towards homosexuals, but I also don't like the use of "butt hurt" and I remember members of GAF being defensive about the term. You know who is not butt hurt? Super masculine males who have reservations about getting their prostate checked, and that's it. It literally leaves everyone else in the world on a lower level, because they just may get items up the butt.
 
I like teaching but I don't know how people do it full time. Rewarding but really hard work.

It's perfect when you get just the right class to teach, but it's really hard otherwise. It's worse when you have to deal with office politics as a teacher though.
 
I thing the term is a bit hostile towards homosexuals, but I also don't like the use of "butt hurt" and I remember members of GAF being defensive about the term. You know who is not butt hurt? Super masculine males who have reservations about getting their prostate checked, and that's it. It literally leaves everyone else in the world on a lower level, because they just may get items up the butt.

Umm, couldn't 'butt hurt' be the result of getting spanked? Why does penetration have to be involved?
 
You guys laugh but I lost a friend this way, we were out in the city bar hopping and at one point I grabbed his knee and winked at him jokingly. (It was in context to some joke he made) but I guess It didn't come off that way because the look on his face said "I've made a huge mistake o_o", he dissapears off somewhere and I don't see him till the next day. I even went to his place the next day to try and clear the air but he couldn't even look me in the eyes he was so traumatized ha

Oh my god by the way you started that I thought the story was going to be that you saying "no homo" somehow caused one of your friends to end up dying.
 
it1WDyMivvcyk.gif

:lolol Not even gonna lie, this is exactly how I pictured it reading the OP.
 
It really astounds me that people do not understand why people are offended by this and why it's bad.

The direct implication of saying "no homo" is that you want to make certain people are aware you are definitely NOT gay, because you don't want to be seen as that (it's bad).

As a gay person myself I find it pretty offensive that people use a phrase to make sure other people know they aren't like you.

Well no, not quite. All the people I've known who have said it 1.) have done so jokingly and 2.) have said it following something overtly sexual which they said to another man 3.) despite the fact they are not homosexual.

In this case the guy was handing out little valentine hearts and wanted to include the guys. I get why he did it (it seemed a romantic thing to do for a guy and he wanted to joke about it), and I get why he shouldn't (it can be funny among friends and in specific overtly sexual situations but this was a classroom and not really romantic anyway), but I don't think the term is offensive strictly speaking.
 
Well no, not quite. All the people I've known who have said it 1.) have done so jokingly and 2.) have said it following something overtly sexual which they said to another man 3.) despite the fact they are not homosexual.

You understand that that's the default use of the phrase, right? The fact that it's a "joke" doesn't magically make it a shitty thing to say. If I make a joke about black people liking watermelon, the fact that I know there's no basis to that stereotype doesn't make it not racist. If anything, it makes it more racist!
 
Well no, not quite. All the people I've known who have said it 1.) have done so jokingly and 2.) have said it following something overtly sexual which they said to another man 3.) despite the fact they are not homosexual.

Yeah well, it's not funny. And I find it cringe-worthy. There's nothing wrong with showing affection to same-sex friend even if you're not sexually interested in them. No one in their right mind will think you're gay even if you don't say that you're straight. Overcompensating, OTOH? Well, there's a case for suspicion. There is this childish mentality amongst men that you're not allowed to be too close with another man because what if someone thinks you're gay? Once again it goes to the whole mentality that gay people are unwanted and joke materials.
 
in all seriousness, in the case that the phrase is used to point out the fact that something just said is in fact a homosexual double entendre, and done so to provoke a laugh, how is that different from 'that's what she said', used in exactly the same way to point out a heterosexual double entedre, in an effort to provoke a laugh?

There are certainly instances were there is no entendre, sure. This was one of them. When used as wordplay, though, how is it derogatory?
 
Here is where I stand. In a perfect world or relationship we would be able to make fun of one another in all ways. I have buddies, even folks on GAF that I talk to outside of the forum that use use my Jewishness as a joke. Make the whole Jew and money jokes. I laugh. I make fun of them as well. Nothing is too sacred between us or off limits but that is due to us knowing eachother well enough to know we respect eachother and aren't actually trying to hurt the other. This is ideal IMO.

Since it's not a perfect world and since we don't know everyone on such a close personal level we need to be cognizant of what words actually mean. I am not going to use the no homo to strangers, coworkers, associates, people on GAF who don't know me or where I stand on gay rights. I would never use it in class either. It's all about knowing your audience so to speak.

Really well put, absolutely agree.
 
Can someone please explain to me when "homo" stopped being a slur or a derogatory slang word? Cause it certainly was when I was a kid, and I'm in my 20s so I'm not THAT old.

Now, of course "homo" is not the most offensive or derogatory word you can use, there are far worse.

But still I'd think every adult should know, just by existing in normal society, that it's not school or work appropriate.
 
Here is where I stand. In a perfect world or relationship we would be able to make fun of one another in all ways. I have buddies, even folks on GAF that I talk to outside of the forum that use use my Jewishness as a joke. Make the whole Jew and money jokes. I laugh. I make fun of them as well. Nothing is too sacred between us or off limits but that is due to us knowing eachother well enough to know we respect eachother and aren't actually trying to hurt the other. This is ideal IMO.

Since it's not a perfect world and since we don't know everyone on such a close personal level we need to be cognizant of what words actually mean. I am not going to use the no homo to strangers, coworkers, associates, people on GAF who don't know me or where I stand on gay rights. I would never use it in class either. It's all about knowing your audience so to speak.

so what you're saying is that in public you're being...stingy...with the phrase?

I am also jewish please don't hurt me
 
Well no, not quite. All the people I've known who have said it 1.) have done so jokingly and 2.) have said it following something overtly sexual which they said to another man 3.) despite the fact they are not homosexual.

In this case the guy was handing out little valentine hearts and wanted to include the guys. I get why he did it (it seemed a romantic thing to do for a guy and he wanted to joke about it), and I get why he shouldn't (it can be funny among friends and in specific overtly sexual situations but this was a classroom and not really romantic anyway), but I don't think the term is offensive strictly speaking.

What does it matter if it was a joke or if they weren't gay?

If a homo isn't around to to hear your "no homo," is it still offensive?

Yes. You're just getting away with it because the people who find it offensive aren't around.
 
Can someone please explain to me when "homo" stopped being a slur or a derogatory slang word? Cause it certainly was when I was a kid, and I'm in my 20s so I'm not THAT old.
.

English isn't my native language and in my native language "homo" is what gay people are called. I thought it was the same in english since "gay" meant something entirely different not so long ago...

Edit: aslo -- him acting all insecure by saying "no homo" is what makes the joke funny. Still think it's just harmless fun.
 
in all seriousness, in the case that the phrase is used to point out the fact that something just said is in fact a homosexual double entendre, and done so to provoke a laugh, how is that different from 'that's what she said', used in exactly the same way to point out a heterosexual double entedre, in an effort to provoke a laugh?

There are certainly instances were there is no entendre, sure. This was one of them. When used as wordplay, though, how is it derogatory?

It's not derogatory but it's insulting never the less. You basically make a joke out of a group of people. And the core of the joke is that you're not one of them because who wants to be one of them? Would you like it if someone said the same thing about you being a Jew?
 
Can someone please explain to me when "homo" stopped being a slur or a derogatory slang word? Cause it certainly was when I was a kid, and I'm in my 20s so I'm not THAT old.

Now, of course "homo" is not the most offensive or derogatory word you can use, there are far worse.

But still I'd think every adult should know, just by existing in normal society, that it's not school or work appropriate.

I think fag kind of took over as the main gay slur and gays just adopted what was left over of homo as their own.
 
Is it really necessary, though? That is the part that I don't get. I've never come across a situation where I felt it was necessary to remind someone of my heterosexuality. Even when gay men flirt with me. Its pretty obvious that they know I am not interested and that I am not gay. So I just say I'm not interested.

i.e. no homo
 
Or it means that if a gay person were to do the same, that would "make more sense" because gay males give valentine hearts to other gay males. It's a stupid joke with negative implications towards gay people, but some of you are seriously blowing this out of proportion if you think it is a vessel of hatred towards gays or whatever you are trying to imply.

How would that make more sense? And why can gay males only give valentines hearts to other gay males? They can't give chocolate to their friends or acquaintances for a holiday like the rest of us?

But you're right. It is a stupid joke. He probably did it flippantly. But now he knows better so it shouldn't happen again.
 
It's not derogatory but it's insulting never the less. You basically make a joke out of a group of people. And the core of the joke is that you're not one of them because who wants to be one of them? Would you like it if someone said the same thing about you being a Jew?

if it was a stereotype about being jewish (and they weren't a good friend and all that) of course I wouldn't like it, but that's not really my point.

Homosexual sex is something homesexual people do, just as heterosexual sex is something heterosexual people do (insert virgin joke here, ha-ha). It is not a stereotype. Basically I'm asking if it is possible that when using 'no homo' in reference SOLELY to a double entendre about homosexual sex - a sex ACT - that it doesn't provide a reason to be offended...

Basically i'm changing it to 'that's what he said.' why is that insulting?
 
It's associated negatively in the manner that the term is used, and in the "joke" as well.

By having to clarify that you're not gay when doing/saying something, you're implying that you are uncomfortable being seen as gay and that it is a negative thing.
So hypothetically if an attractive single girl thought you were gay based upon some random words you said one day...and you wanted to clarify because you're uncomfortable with her seeing you as gay...that would be a bad thing because everyone should feel comfortable being seen as something they're not... ?
 
So hypothetically if an attractive single girl thought you were gay based upon some random words you said one day...and you wanted to clarify because you're uncomfortable with her seeing you as gay...that would be a bad thing because everyone should feel comfortable being seen as something they're not... ?

What random word would make someone think you were gay...
 
So hypothetically if an attractive single girl thought you were gay based upon some random words you said one day...and you wanted to clarify because you're uncomfortable with her seeing you as gay...that would be a bad thing because everyone should feel comfortable being seen as something they're not... ?

Here's my response to a similar question from earlier in the thread:

It's definitely not wrong to be uncomfortable. In fact I myself am super uncomfortable when girls hit on me.

But there's quite a difference between being uncomfortable and having to verbally reassure others that you are in fact not gay, occasionally in situations where it's probably not even implied (like the one in the OP).
 
if it was a stereotype about being jewish (and they weren't a good friend and all that) of course I wouldn't like it, but that's not really my point.

Homosexual sex is something homesexual people do, just as heterosexual sex is something heterosexual people do (insert virgin joke here, ha-ha). It is not a stereotype. Basically I'm asking if it is possible that when using 'no homo' in reference SOLELY to a double entendre about homosexual sex - a sex ACT - that it doesn't provide a reason to be offended...

Basically i'm changing it to 'that's what he said.' why is that insulting?

It basically states that if I do something nice for another man I am gay unless I state otherwise

That doesn't seem stereotypical to you?
 
In the best case scenario:

Here's a love heart, because I love you, but not sexually.

In the worst case scenario:

Here's a love heart with my message of hate on it.


Fine, blow your gasket in the latter, but take a little effort to figure out the intention then modulate your response to fit.

i.e.: Those are nice intentions, but this could be taken the wrong way because

or You fucking nitwit, we're in the 21st century, and this is the shit you pull?!
 
Basically i'm changing it to 'that's what he said.' why is that insulting?

So you obviously straight, you obviously know that you don't like gay sex and yet you choose to act like you like it as a joke then claim that you're "no homo". Yeah, there's nothing exclusionary and offensive about it at all. /eyeroll

Imagine if one of your friends is gay but he never tells anyone and he has to put up with the constant gay sex jokes but then you always conclude with "no homo". You don't think he'd at least feel uncomfortable/unwanted being in your group?

You basically reduce his sexuality to nothing but jokes, one that you can get away with because you're "no homo". But he, OTOH, can't get away from it because he's gay and in his world, he's the victim of crass joke like this.
 
It basically states that if I do something nice for another man I am gay unless I state otherwise

That doesn't seem stereotypical to you?

no no i agree with you. This is probably not even a worthwhile point to discuss but here it is broken down:

There two basic uses of 'no homo':

1. What you all are talking about, which is saying it to 'make sure' someone doesn't think you're gay after doing something that could be possibly misconstrued as such.

2. Using it to call attention to a double entendre that either you or someone else said, in the same vein as 'that's what she said' (how i've heard it used mostly among my friends)

What you're talking about falls under category 1, which I agree is stereotypical and frankly childish.

But category 2 doesn't come off to me as relying on any stereotype for humor. Only the double entedre.

If in fact it's offensive simply because the words 'no' and 'homo' are in close proximity to each other, than that's a different discussion. I'm just trying to flesh out the context in which it's sometimes used...

This requires a ninja edit:
So you obviously straight, you obviously know that you don't like gay sex and yet you choose to act like you like it as a joke then claim that you're "no homo". Yeah, there's nothing exclusionary and offensive about it at all. /eyeroll

Imagine if one of your friends is gay but he never tells anyone and he has to put up with the constant gay sex jokes but then you always conclude with "no homo". You don't think he'd at least feel uncomfortable/unwanted being in your group?

You basically reduce his sexuality to nothing but jokes, one that you can get away with because you're "no homo". But he, OTOH, can't get away from it because he's gay and in his world, he's the victim of crass joke like this.
Firstly, you're projecting a lot of shit on me and I frankly don't appreciate it. I'm not attacking you, and I have in fact never done any of the things you've stated.

To actually respond to what you said: I'm sure what you're describing has happened (and probably often). Maybe it was your friends. Maybe your friends are shitty people. But, alas, I am not one to make assumptions.

I frankly don't understand how pointing out double entendre and 'acting like i like [gay sex] as a joke' are in any way related to each other.

So we understand each other, what I think you're saying is something like the following:

Straight friend to closeted gay friend: "I'm gonna ram my cock in your mouth. no homo".

Is that the general idea?
 
Dude relax.

I will bathe in the crimson rivers that gush forth from Bish's crushed skull and I'll make absolutely certain you'll have a front row seat, bound helplessly as I feast. Your brain will be dessert. And worry not, I'll keep you alive long enough so that you can have a taste of your own mind as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom