Am I the only one not that impressed. Looked like the same boring campaign stuff from battlefield 3 with more polished and a bit upgraded graphics.
I would say MW2 was the one that jumped the shark in terms of Michael Bay style of gameplay. CoD4 had a Black hawk Down vibe but it still tried to remained based in reality.
I think most people want better crafted experiences, instead of freedom simulators.
I think most people want better crafted experiences, instead of freedom simulators.
See but if you wanna make Black Hawk Down then you need to slow down the action, and you need one hit kills basically.
Because if you go out there and you make everything around you "real", then when the bullets start flying it also needs to feel real or else there will be this huge disconnect between what's happening around you and what you are able to do as a player.
What I learn from movies like Black Hawk Down is that you don't go into war and kill 400 hundred people by yourself. You don't go around swapping weapons like a mad man, and you sure as shit don't stay combat able when you get hit by a high caliber round.
Striving for realism in action games is a losing proposition.
I like to think we live in a world where there is a happy medium between MW3 and Arma3.
Yes, everyone here are absolutely excited to play the new BF4 campaign!
Am I the only one not that impressed. Looked like the same boring campaign stuff from battlefield 3 with more polished and a bit upgraded graphics.
Everything happening is like parody. If you showed me a few snips here and there I might believe it's Bad Company 3. But everything here is played in a really serious way and it all just gets to be super weird.
Next gen is already dead if this is all it can muster up visually.
I personally enjoyed the BC 1& 2 campaigns somewhat, but i have no idea why anyone would want to subject themselves to this one, lol.I would be excited for the multiplayer but will have to hear more about it first, like if they will have micro transactions everywhere. The graphics are damn good though, a step up from BF3 but nothing that makes me excited for the campaign.
I would be excited for the multiplayer but will have to hear more about it first, like if they will have micro transactions everywhere. The graphics are damn good though, a step up from BF3 but nothing that makes me excited for the campaign. Maybe the BF3 campaign just killed any excitement for a BF campaign ever for me.
That'll be left a secret for us to find out for ourselves I'm sure.
You don't have to go all "super hardcore one hit kills" to switch up the tempo and vibe of a shooter. Here we have a game with some kind of Chinese locales in there somewhere, but what they choose to show off is a boring desert backdrop, and bog standard cinematic set pieces. They could've easily shown off something unique in a new environment with a different feel to the shootouts and events happening around the player. Maybe even a bit more player agency instead of watching AI find downed comrades, or AI clearing civilians from the combat zone, or AI sprinting through the levels for you to follow, or AI removing the boards from the windows so you can take potshots at the shooting gallery. I mean gotdamn. At least the player's driving the vehicles, Battlefield 4 does that much.
It is amazing how fucking jaded people are. It is amazing what some of you expect.
I think they have to improve the actual content, and the delivery of said content. It also comes down to whether devs wanna make a game and tell a story or if they just want to make a simulator of something.
Once in the land of gaming far away, long ago it was not unprecedented to expect new things from new platforms and games.
But that's like the "hippies" era of gaming. And everyone hates hippies rite?
See but if you wanna make Black Hawk Down then you need to slow down the action, and you need one hit kills basically.
Because if you go out there and you make everything around you "real", then when the bullets start flying it also needs to feel real or else there will be this huge disconnect between what's happening around you and what you are able to do as a player.
What I learn from movies like Black Hawk Down is that you don't go into war and kill 400 hundred people by yourself. You don't go around swapping weapons like a mad man, and you sure as shit don't stay combat able when you get hit by a high caliber round.
Striving for realism in action games is a losing proposition.
Looks impressive, any indication what it's running on? PC? PS4? Next Xbox?
Once in the land of gaming far away, long ago it was not unprecedented to expect new things from new platforms and games.
But that's like the "hippies" era of gaming. And everyone hates hippies rite?
Yes, slow it the hell down a bit then.
As far as bullet damage, we should be at a point with technology that one can model skeletons and vitals. If a round "goes through" meaning it doesn't hit anything vital, then you live to keep on fighting, maybe put a filter on to simulate a bit of pain. If a round hits say a forearm then you have to pull out a sidearm to fire effectively back or can spray and pray with your main weapon if it's something like say a M4 or UMP. Headshots, spine shots, heart, etc you're dead. I miss the old Rainbow 6s and SOCOM 1 for example, their SP was so much more intense without cars flying at you, buildings collapsing, explosions everywhere.
There maybe "hardcore modes" in these games, but they have a disconnect to themselves as they just play off the core game which is "run, run, run, die, respawn, run, run, die, respawn".
If the SP played out like a BHD I'd give it a go, but since it obviously won't because there's just shit flying everywhere, exploding, collapsing, whizzing by, jumping over catwalk gaps, it'll just be another over the top shit fest. "Modern Warfares" are responsible for this, despite that at one time CoDs had a tolerable campaign back in the WW2 titles pre-CoD4.
Oh I agree with that much, that's why I said the delivery should get better. I'm just saying that unless you have a 200 million dollar budget you aren't gonna get a macro and micro level experience, it just doesn't happen.
For example Assassins Creed 3 or GTA or whatever, how the hell do you convey a sense of narrative when in reality you are fucking it all up. Oh the world is about to end? Hold up, imma let you finish but first I gotta do this completely unrelated shit that would never make sense in a situation like it.
Lol , people saying they're not impressed: What are you guys expecting? the game is a FPS, almost open world.. and it looks this good.. i don't get the complains seriously.
I liked the incredible dynamic and choice-filled combat scenario full of engagement possibilities. Like where the guy playing the demo pretended not to see the buggy, didn't shoot the soldiers with his assault rifle for no reason, then walked ten feet to the side, blew up a conveniently sized chunk of wall to create a door, then turned around and shot the bad guys with a different gun from five feet away. Then he resumed walking forward. Then they met more bad guys, and he did the same "walk ten feet to the side and move forward, then turn around and shoot the bad guys with another gun" thing. But if you'll notice, at times he told his teammates to shoot at bad guys. Then there were bad guys in the distance, and they shot them from a predetermined vantage point like a roof or a window, and then that happened again.
I'm gonna help balance the results here with my unfavorable opinion: I wasn't all that impressed. Good graphics but can't say anything else. I play on a mid-high end gaming PC every day so I know full well that better graphics translate into nothing for my experience.
i cant help beat feel like i've already played the entire game.
Once in the land of gaming far away, long ago it was not unprecedented to expect new things from new platforms and games.
But that's like the "hippies" era of gaming. And everyone hates hippies rite?
I am really not seeing it. Either way it doesn't matter. This isn't enough of a leap over last gen to get people investing in hardware. I would bet anything Battlefield 5 or whatever it's called comes out in 2014 and blows this game out of the water.Doesn't look much worse than DeepDown, something a lot of people thought was CGi.
Once in the land of gaming far away, long ago it was not unprecedented to expect new things from new platforms and games.
But that's like the "hippies" era of gaming. And everyone hates hippies rite?
c'mon son you need a high framerate for these GIFs.
![]()
I'd really like to know what people like you actually want/expect from the gameplay of next gen shooters.
Are you telling me that this video game might not be entirely realistic?