360p 240fps
720p 30fps
Since the console versions are effectively a no show, kindly don't mind me making stuff up
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Battlefield 4 "Fishing in Baku" 17 minute gameplay video reveal
- Thread starter Wario64
- Start date
- Status
360p 240fps
720p 30fps
Since the console versions are effectively a no show, kindly don't mind me making stuff up
BloodMoney
Banned
Never made it all the way through BF3's SP campaign considering it was so.... typical. Here's to hoping they can do more with BF4 than just make it look pretty, which it obviously does.
MoonLightWave
Member
Nizz
Member
Wasn't that just a rumor, though? I mean, if it does end up being 1080p at 60 then hot damn I will be super impressed.
maniac-kun
Member
The singleplayer from BF3 was way different from the MP.
shinobi602
Member
Really? I could've sworn everyone here said all the leaks turned out true in the end. Interesting.
fluffydelusions
Member
Looks like bf3
Nope. 7870 [48fps] and 7850 [46fps] @1080p ultra
Now in a close box it might be able to...
I wonder if amd driver improve performance since these 2012 benchmarks
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...50-2GB-Pitcairn-Review/Battlefield-3-Radeon-0
edit:wow look at the performance improve in the Cat 12.11 driver
7870 went from 58.2 average at launch to 73fps @ 1920x1200 !! wow
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6393/amds-holiday-plans-cat1211-new-bundle
Confidence Man
Member
As I watched all I thought about was the time and budget that could've been spent on making more large scale multiplayer maps.
Wishmaster92
Member
360p 240fps
720p 30fps
Since the console versions are effectively a no show, kindly don't mind me making stuff up
Save 360p and the feel of 240fps for the next gen cod, it needs to be innovative and revolutionary lol.
Although I abhor 1:1 comparison, think of a modified Pitcairn (7850 and 7870) that through customization looks to perform closer to 7870.
I hope they keep the Battlefield theme when your team is winning in a match. That shit is good.
Hmmn.. So theres a possibility even at "almost-ultra" 1080 with locked 60 or a variable 30-60 at ultra 1080.
Hmmn.. So theres a possibility even at "almost-ultra" 1080 with locked 60 or a variable 30-60 at ultra 1080.
Liferebooted
Banned
Is that really even BF4? Just looks like the pc version of BF3.
snoopeasystreet
Member
It's substantially better on paper but who knows where it'll end up when they can code specifically for a closed console.
Angry Fork
Member
Thought most of it was boring until the last 5-6 minutes which were very impressive, cool set pieces. Especially when he grabs his partner before he falls and you see the helicopter crash below. The music playing when he shoots the helicopter was great too.
But yea the rest made me roll my eyes even though it's pretty. I think I just hate modern day military FPS campaigns in general now. Both the corridor's and the open spaces with waves of enemies bore me. I really wish we could play as something other than BRO YOU ALRIGHT BRO American men.
But yea the rest made me roll my eyes even though it's pretty. I think I just hate modern day military FPS campaigns in general now. Both the corridor's and the open spaces with waves of enemies bore me. I really wish we could play as something other than BRO YOU ALRIGHT BRO American men.
It's well above the PS4. It's a very very expensive card. It's a dual GPU card. Currently it's priced at about 700 quid (roughly 1000 dollars)
Broder Salsa
Banned
Why would they name a GPU after a country lol
cyberheater
PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
Looks exactly how I hoped a next gen game would look. Fantastic.
Those were at launch number. Since then amd has updated the drivers. The performance improvement were like 15% for bf3. I edited that post.
I see no reason why they couldnt do it at 1080p 60fps on ps4....
grosvenor_92
Member
It looked nice at least.
MoonLightWave
Member
They could,but just not at these settings we see now in the 17 minutes gameplay reveal.
Doc Holliday
SPOILER: Columbus finds America
WOW, FUCK ME SIDEWAYS :O
Naked Lunch
Member
Graphics look pretty insane.
Gut feeling is im not seeing much new even down to the same knife animations. Highly scripted single player, with ridiculous action and every turn, just doesnt do it for me. Not sure why so many resources are spent on something most Battlefield fans will NEVER touch. They could easily just make single player a simple training ground for multiplayer.
Multiplayer probably wont be talked about until the E3 show and that isnt until the summer. It would have been nice to get some info on multiplayer the new features and such. We need to know if its 64 players on consoles because this still is not confirmed yet its all riding on that for me.
Gut feeling is im not seeing much new even down to the same knife animations. Highly scripted single player, with ridiculous action and every turn, just doesnt do it for me. Not sure why so many resources are spent on something most Battlefield fans will NEVER touch. They could easily just make single player a simple training ground for multiplayer.
Multiplayer probably wont be talked about until the E3 show and that isnt until the summer. It would have been nice to get some info on multiplayer the new features and such. We need to know if its 64 players on consoles because this still is not confirmed yet its all riding on that for me.
Sadly so far we can't find any version of that video except ripped mp4 from youtube. We tried contacting DiCE/EA, but nothing so far.
MoonLightWave
Member
Can't wait for a 60 fps video link.
Thought it was BF2 for a second myself.
GANGSTERKILLER
Member
360p 240fps
720p 30fps
Since the console versions are effectively a no show, kindly don't mind me making stuff up
I'm happy with 720p@60fps. Even with a steady 30 fps on console.
But I don't want to see major framedrops and screen tearing. The PS4 has the power to meet my expectations, no doubt about that.
I will always be a console guy. Always.
TO put it in perspective on BF3 the PS4's GPU would do about 44 FPS as an avergage at 1080p with all effects at ultra setting. This is of course with a much better processor backing it up. The 7990 however does the same at 149 FPS.Then again though that card draws 500watts which is insane.
nelsonroyale
Member
500 watts is insane...
MrChowderClams
Member
Yeah, same here - I wuldn't mind 720p @60fps with some nice antialiasing to smooth out the edges (I prefer it to 1080p without AA).
Actually, it would be neat if you could choose the internal rendering resolution on next-gen consoles as a fast way to get better performance. I think (?) that on current gen, you can change the output resolution, but it doesn't improve performance because the internal render res stays the same.
nelsonroyale
Member
Wouldnt be happy with 720p at all. I guess if this is running on a 7990 it should be at higher than 1080p and way above 60 fps...
Seeing that consoles have no settings really it will be at whatever dice set them at. To say they cant do something is silly based on nothing....
Have to disagree. Wish more games would target 720p. With a tv you have to sit so close to see the difference between 1080p and 720p.
You can take 3 rounds in your body armor and don't die, but you wont be standing either, and most likely have quite the few fractures and bruises.
SniperHunter
Banned
That sucks, hopefully you will get it later today
Syphon Filter
Member
meh doesn't look impressive to me.
jacksepticeye
Member
So I just woke up and threads all exploded. WHat's the consensus? Everyone hate it like I expected because it's more of the same old BF/CoD set piece stuff?
If we're not taking the CPU into consideration and look just at pixel rendering times then 1080@44fps is about the same as 900@60fps, which I think I'd be okay with...
On the topic of MP vs SP, it's an odd one. I only played BF3 for its multiplayer but for some reason, I don't think I'd buy a multiplayer only game.
nelsonroyale
Member
But that is because there are very few of the high end consoles games which target 1080p. Even playing games on my laptop, which had a gtx 485, the difference between 720 and 1080 is very noticible...
While extremely impressive in it's own right I couldn't finish watching the whole demo. Nothing shown was particularly interesting beyond the visuals. I'll be more interested in seeing this engine in Mass Effect to be honest. Still extremely pretty, but this is something I'm gonna have to play myself to enjoy.
Yes because on a laptop you sit 2ft from it at most.
http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html
Most people sit about 8-10ft from a tv. You need a tv larger than 50" to really see any difference.
Yeah, wtf was that
SirButterstick
Banned
Anyone who says this looks like BF3 is out of their minds. This looks so much more detailed in terms of character models, textures and lighting, as well as particle effects. It looks awesome.
I can't wait.
I can't wait.
shinobi602
Member
Can you elaborate? I haven't seen any game look this good visually, including Crysis 3.
- Status