Black Mamba
Member
I'm not trying to prove it, BM. How are you missing that point? I'm trying to investigate it. The easiest way to investigate it is to ask others who have made assertions about the truth of the matter, because I assume that you and pigeon and Link wouldn't make the assertions in direct contradiction to what I said unless you had some reason to believe what you were saying was true.
For instance, I believed that what I said was true based on my own experience with conservatives. Of course, that's not very compelling evidence, which is why I decided I needed better evidence if I were to get to the truth. You don't have any, so I'll wait for one of the others to be helpful.
(BTW, if you guys don't have the evidence, I don't expect you to go out of your way to find it. I couldn't expect that from you if I'm not willing to do the same.)
You made the first assertion here:
You can bet that if this had been revealed before the election, it would have encouraged more Tea Party types and conservatives to get out and vote against Obama, however little they liked Romney.
I made a snide remark about that and you took offense. Shouldn't you be proving it to me and not the other way around? After you, you even said I could bet it. That's a very strong assertion.
What makes you think conservatives stayed home on election night, at least in states that matter. I won't deny that conservatives in places like California stayed home but the IRS scandal wouldn't have put Cali in play and their votes are irrelevant so we don't count those.
Why would conservatives in Ohio, Va, Fla, etc stayed home? Why wouldn't they have voted? And I find this even harder to believe considering turnout was up in the swing states.
I think the argument that Romney didn't turn out enough "conservatives" as a ridiculous proposition. They could have ran a broomstick and it would have turned them out just as much (arguably they did run out a broomstick, but neither here nor there).