I'm actually European myself, I just think it's weird how one modern technology has seen almost complete adoption in North America and almost none in Europe. With metric and imperial units, it's a matter of what you're used to but having AC seems like a clear advantage over not having AC. People spend money on all kinds of crap around the house but I don't know anyone around here with residential AC or ever heard of anyone seriously considering it.
It's because the countries in question aren't normally so hot that AC is required. It's expensive to get, costs comparatively much to use, so with only needing it a few days a year is not enough to get it. It's too superfluous to get. It'd sort of be like getting a microwave because your mother brings you soup once a year, and you want to heat it in a microwave.
Again, I just wonder how come that so many people stick with it when most people are so lazy and shun anything that requires technical expertise, while flocking towards anything that makes their lives easier.
AT means less control of your car and fewer miles per gallon. I don't know the price difference, but there's a cultural factor, too. Most people have MT cars, so you get your MT license.
I actually considered going for a Tesla as my first car, but I just need the fun manual transmission is, so I have to get a car with it. Clutching, engine braking and torque control is essentially the best thing about driving cars. I've had my fair share of racing simulators, too, and I love manual transmission there, too.
I'd personally like to see more ACs over here and one might think that would be the logical consequence of hotter and hotter summers. But I don't believe that's going to happen because environmentalism is so strong here and ACs do undeniably use a lot of power.
Power itself isn't bad. The pollution that comes from making power is what's bad. There's no emissions from an AC itself, so there's nothing wrong with an AC. Yes, we should conserve power, because we can't make all of it emission free, but this is not what's holding the adaptation rate down. There's simply too little use for it. Europe uses a lot of power for heating, and no one blames us for that. It's not about it. If everyone gets an AC to keep it steady at 22, then it's bad. If everyone got ACs to help with extreme heat days, it'd be good, but that's essentially never. That's why this happens.
Also, you worded the thing you said originally in a very incoherent way, that's why I pointed it out.
That's probably the main reason. But with 0.5% and hundreds/thousands of dead for every heat wave, obviously even those who would certainly need AC don't have it. On the other hand, 85% of American homes is probably more than just the South.
Wait, what's this last sentence? I don't get what you're saying. Again, it's hard to proof all houses in the UK for extreme heat with ACs when it's needed once a blue moon.