Are you just willfully overlooking that they were friends who played online games together? It's a stretch to assume his friend also didn't know about that stuff. Friends use the same memes.I think most don't know know what groypher, 4chan are even in high school. Really edgy stuff
Too much finger pointing over "whose side" he was on, and not enough about this reality
Are you just willfully overlooking that they were friends who played online games together? It's a stretch to assume his friend also didn't know about that stuff. Friends use the same memes.
LMAO the reality is he was on "your side" not mine"Shooters motives don't matter anymore"
Oh fuck off! Both sides were eager to cling to the motives, hell yesterday alone he went from a trans person, protrans, a crazy old guy, a millennial, to now being a "Groyper" far right, infighting right, far left, gamer, etc.
His motive absolutely matters as it's the reason this act was carried out. Being dismissive of it because it doesn't fit your "side" is a bad stance.
I personally think you're reaching but that's your opinion. If his high school friend said he was a leftist, I don't see the use in doing mental gymnastic to question how well his friend even knew him.It's pretty rare, in my circles at least, to be sharing online ids for places like Reddit, here, others. And most definitely not 4chan, that would for sure be closeted
I personally think you're reaching but that's your opinion. If his high school friend said he was a leftist, I don't see the use in doing mental gymnastic to question how well his friend even knew him.
At some point we have to decide to question and not believe anything, or believe the reports we are being told.
You got that one way wrong. That guy wasn't maga, he used to work for Governor Walz, he was likely upset because that Democrat law maker wasn't Far Left enough, she was the one that crossed parties likes to vote against illegal migrants from getting handouts. You can even see in her last appearances with media she was visibility upset because she knew she was going to piss off a lot of Democrats.We just had a MAGA crazy murder several Democrats a few months ago and it's been memory-holed already.
I don't think you know what I meant. He was probably most of the time on the opposite side of those he debated, but he put himself out there and exposed people to ideas and thoughts that were ideologically alien to them. And they got the opportunity to speak their mind.CK was not a centrist bro; He was not trying to bridge the gap. Centrists are people like Sam Harris and The Bulwark. CK was a much more charismatic and polished version of Steven Crowder.
I personally think you're reaching but that's your opinion. If his high school friend said he was a leftist, I don't see the use in doing mental gymnastic to question how well his friend even knew him.
At some point we have to decide to question and not believe anything, or believe the reports we are being told.
Ok last message but the suit has been settled! They aren't going anywhere for now!This is super duper OT but currently FSU and Clemson have a lawsuit going against the ACC where they are trying to leave sooner than 2030
We can chat about this in the college football thread if you want because it's been a pretty interesting saga though completely unrelated to Charlie Kirk so I'll stop posting about it now lol
No fuck that, have I once in this thread supported any of this? You keep trying to blame this on anyone left leaning when the ones who are cheering this are far off either side. Don't try and pin this on users here.LMAO the reality is he was on "your side" not mine
For what it's worth, higher learning institutions are full of... can you guess it? PEERS influenced by the internet.
That logic falls very close in line with sayings like " look at what she was wearing. She was asking for it."I'm not saying he deserved to die - he didn't. I didn't agree with his positions, but I absolutely support freedom of speech.
At the same time, it seems obvious to me if someone makes it their profession to go around saying highly inflammatory things like we should force minors who've been raped to deliver their rapist's children, that is something that some people (especially women) will take personally. The person saying this stuff is making themselves a target for crazies.
I don't see this any different than the left-wing trolls who were saying the government should force COVID vaccines on every person who refused to get one voluntarily. There have been plenty of people on the right threatening violence if they were forced into taking a vaccine. If there were a prominent left-wing speaker saying that in public, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they got shot like Kirk did.
Make yourself a target, and it's not surprising you get attacked.
Again, it's not right. It's wrong on every level. I'm just not surprised that this happened given Kirk's comments over the years.
But the stats still wouldn't override the fact that white liberal women represent the overwhelming majority of liberal/progressive women. Without knowing where he's at, the generalization statistically and numerically would just be a white liberal to pick from randomly.look at the stats i posted. it was a joke based on the percentage of black women who voted for kamala.
colleges needs to be held accountable for their brainwashing
![]()
![]()
You got that one way wrong. That guy wasn't maga, he used to work for Governor Walz, he was likely upset because that Democrat law maker wasn't Far Left enough, she was the one that crossed parties likes to vote against illegal migrants from getting handouts. You can even see in her last appearances with media she was visibility upset because she knew she was going to piss off a lot of Democrats.
![]()
Assassinated Minnesota Dem Melissa Hortman had just crossed party lines to cast decisive vote against illegal migrant handouts: ‘What leaders do’
Melissa Hortman, the state House Democratic leader, was the only member of her party to side with Republicans and vote to repeal taxpayer-funded healthcare coverage for adult illegal immigrants as …nypost.com
Since he shot a conservative figure, it's pretty obvious he was radicalized by leftists, otherwise he would have shot a democrat. Only a leftist would call Charlike Kirk "fascist", because only they use that word as an insult nowadays.
This thread is a good example of that.
This won't stop thousands of people from deciding that the guy who seems to hate fascism must also be a fascist and not leftwing violence, because violence in response to free speech aligns with fascism. Checkmate atheists. Or something to that effect.
Don't mind me I'm just enjoying the mental gymnastics required to make someone who fired a rifle at a conservative figurehead and had antifa slogans on his bullet casings and whose friends apparently confirm was a leftist into not-a-leftist.Probably right, maybe. As one can clearly see across gaf, social media, and the national media, that many people are heavily invested in the narrative supporting a particular ideology. With the nation breathing down their neck, would a hard right parent or friend admit that there assassin son/friend was influenced by their own ideology, or would they want to spin it in support of their beliefs system? I'm not making accusations, just some things I'm thinking about.
Edit: I don't see what is particularly humourous about my musings. If you think I'm way off track regarding the psychology of what they are going through, you could respond and push back.
calico
YupThat logic falls very close in line with sayings like " look at what she was wearing. She was asking for it."
Just like last night for you;Don't mind me I'm just enjoying the mental gymnastics required to make someone who fired a rifle at a conservative figurehead and had antifa slogans on his bullet casings and whose friends apparently confirm was a leftist into not-a-leftist.
![]()
Make no mistake, this kid was radicalized on a discord server, reddit, era-like forum, something like that, this isn't a school or college thing.
People who don't interact with young kids have absolutely no idea what is going on in these places. And when they feel vindicated, when the obamas tell them to be angry, when kamala calls trump a fascist, when cnn is 24/7 pushing hateful rhetoric against anyone who doesn't adhere to their lunacies of dei's and trans, one of them might actually act on it. This time is Kirk, next time could be anyone who doesn't fall in line.
I sincerely feel bad for this kid because i know how easy it is to manipulate a teen with these falsehoods, how easy it is to make them feel like a victim. It's a monumental tragedy but i don't expect the enablers to change. If anything they will double down to make conservatives scared.
"Women taking things personally" doesn't have any bearing on whether important issues should be debated in the open.I'm not saying he deserved to die - he didn't. I didn't agree with his positions, but I absolutely support freedom of speech.
At the same time, it seems obvious to me if someone makes it their profession to go around saying highly inflammatory things like we should force minors who've been raped to deliver their rapist's children, that is something that some people (especially women) will take personally. The person saying this stuff is making themselves a target for crazies.
I don't see this any different than the left-wing trolls who were saying the government should force COVID vaccines on every person who refused to get one voluntarily. There have been plenty of people on the right threatening violence if they were forced into taking a vaccine. If there were a prominent left-wing speaker saying that in public, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they got shot like Kirk did.
Make yourself a target, and it's not surprising you get attacked.
Again, it's not right. It's wrong on every level. I'm just not surprised that this happened given Kirk's comments over the years.
Since he shot a conservative figure, it's pretty obvious he was radicalized by leftists, otherwise he would have shot a democrat. Only a leftist would call Charlike Kirk "fascist", because only they use that word as an insult nowadays.
This thread is a good example of that.
They have largely ignored the reality that Trump won the popular vote and that they are the radicals and extremists and also that they are the minority. But they are going to find out now since they openly celebrated political assassination for all the world to see. There won't be any moderate Democrats left soon after all moderates flee the party, leaving them permanently in the electoral minority for the foreseeable future
This does mean that as they continue to lose power, they will increase the violence. They aren't going to learn from this and stop being violent, it's likely they will become even more violent. Take care of yourselves, your friends, and your families
"Women taking things personally" doesn't have any bearing on whether important issues should be debated in the open.
Not sure how folks feel about this YT channel (they're a bit left-leaning, but they make sure to point out hypocrisy in both sides typically), but I found this to be a great interview. They managed to get some air-time with the individual who was debating Charlie when the assassination occurred. It covers many prevalent topics related to political extremism, the dangers of "righteous" violence, the essential need to keep an open platform of debate, etc.
Mods, if this is leaning too far into the political territory then please remove my post.
Dems aren't better. Stacy Abrams also haven't given up on the fact she won even though she lost like 3 times.Trump still insists he "won" 2020, an attitude that directly led to a violent riot he has called a "day of love" unironically, and there's no greater ignorance or outright denial of reality than that.
You're also assuming that all moderate Democrats would join a Republican party whose leader is currently doing any number of questionable things that are very far from being moderate in content, much less in form.
I feel sorry for his family, not him. Dude was 22, old enough to know what he was doing and old enough to assume the consequences. He seemed to have had loving parents, but for some reason decided to throw all of this away. He didnt only ruin his own life and took the life of Charlie, but also ruined everyone's lives who was near to Charlie, he ruined the lives of his family members.
I dont get how this guy evaluated that it was worth it. What exactly did he achieve?
what do you mean lolI think they also cancelled Seinfeld today as well.
It is a little humorous. You're suggesting all of his family and friends coordinated to lie about his political leanings in order to make the left look bad and uphold MAGA. Come on. He even inscribed anti-fascist stuff all over the ammo. It's getting to be a pretty clear picture of where he was getting his extremism from. The better take away from all this is just to improve relations on both sides by toning down the rhetoric, left or right, and not to monster people with differing opinions.Probably right, maybe. As one can clearly see across gaf, social media, and the national media, that many people are heavily invested in the narrative supporting a particular ideology. With the nation breathing down their neck, would a hard right parent or friend admit that there assassin son/friend was influenced by their own ideology, or would they want to spin it in support of their beliefs system? I'm not making accusations, just some things I'm thinking about.
Edit: I don't see what is particularly humourous about my musings. If you think I'm way off track regarding the psychology of what they are going through, you could respond and push back.
calico
read the thread, he was not far right. he was far left. and far gone.Some people are backpeddeling hard
![]()
People used to blame anonymity for all the vile shit online. Now they are posting cruel stuff proudly with their full name, profile pic and LinkedIn like they are talking about mundane stuff like sport. Absolute insane people.People like this monster are wayyyyyy too comfortable with posting demonic filth like this on their personal socials.... Colleges and Universities are enablers and allow this shit and it has to stop, It's not fucking normal at all.
This demon is clearly very comfortable posting that as he will expect no repercussions and will work and live around people who are the same, If I was his boss I would have his papers ready the moment he stepped foot in the door.
I'm so fucking confused, how did that thing survive falling into Mount Doom while chasing the One Ring?
Dems aren't better. Stacy Abrams also haven't given up on the fact she won even though she lost like 3 times.
Trump isn't great, but let's not pretend that besides mean tweets he's not calling for violence.
People used to blame anonymity for all the vile shit online. Now they are posting cruel stuff proudly with their full name, profile pic and LinkedIn like they are talking about mundane stuff like sport.
The temperature/mood change even in this thread was something as soon as we saw that he was cis and white. It went from feeling like something that could start a war to something people are moving on from and will forget about soon.Some people are backpeddeling hard
![]()
Lol. Sam Harris, you mean the centrist who defended the hiding of the Hunter Biden laptop story by compared a second trump presidency to a planet destroying asteroid. Dude might have the worst case of TDS of all time.CK was not a centrist bro; He was not trying to bridge the gap. Centrists are people like Sam Harris and The Bulwark. CK was a much more charismatic and polished version of Steven Crowder.
Dems aren't better. Stacy Abrams also haven't given up on the fact she won even though she lost like 3 times.
Trump isn't great, but let's not pretend that besides mean tweets he's not calling for violence.