giri said:
Pop would be up for one, Manu, tim and TP should all be on a few all * teams
Thibs is CotY. That is not changing. Spurs have no 6th man or MIP deserving or MVP
As for All-NBA, Manu is not all-NBA this season and Duncan you could argue I guess, but since he's listed as a forward, he cannot be ahead of Pau, Durant, James, Dirk. Then there's KG, Pierce, Zbo, Aldridge, Griffin, Amar'e, Pierce, and Melo with which he must be better than all but 1.
He hasn't even crossed 2000 minutes played this season. It's really hard to put someone who has played that little on an all-nba team. I am a huge timmy fan, too.
Parker & Manu have to contend with: Nash, Kobe, Cp3, Wade, Rondo, Rose, Westbrook, and Deron. Have they had better seasons than 3 of those guys? Maybe Parker, but that's it.
edit: I guess Duncan could go on an all-defensive team. But with so few minutes, ehh...
I just don't think home court advantage or any of these games mean anything. All these teams are capable of beating each other on the road and they're all capable of beating each other in a series. Whatever happens in the playoffs, happens...whoever wins will be praised for all the strengths they had as a champion, and whoever lost will have their weaknesses magnified as the reason they lost. That's just how it is. Boston damn well could have won game 7 last year without Perkins...yet all you hear from their camp is "We didn't have Perk!" even though they looked fine for most of the game.
likewise, if the lakers lost, you'd be hearing way more about kobe going 6/24, rather than hearing so much of the "OMG 15 rebounds champions find a way to win"
Personally, I don't think Miami can win without HCA vs. Boston.
I also think Lakers don't win game 7 in Boston last season. So yes, I think it matters. Not always and title teams have to win on the road sometimes, but I just don't think Miami has the balls to win twice in Boston (since I think Boston wins at least once in Miami).