Just going to gloss over my posts? The evidence (and most of our eyes) don't support your absurd hypothesis.
You are BEST-GAF's creationist.
Was just looking at them but I don't really buy those stats. LOOK at how we actually play without Bynum. The ball moves and Kobe's not getting shots late in the clock cos Bynum's pounding the ball inside wasting time. I will say, "I told you so" the minute he comes back and the offense looks like shit again
He is a BIG offensive liability. And i fear it's not because he does not have the skill. He just seems disinterested in playing any type of offensive game. It's sad cause he seems to have some potential.
Too many guys who want to score is probably our BIGGEST problem on offense (when Bynum plays). The guy can score if he's featured but he is a willing passer and he brings ENERGY on both ends. I value unselfish energy guys who can be productive when not scoring.
IMO. The ideal Lakers lineup is
Ramon
Kobe
Barnes (Just cos he can run the floor and make wide open 3s)
McBob (He'll get out of Pau's way, set screens for the guards and just hustle. Plus he can finish at the rim)
Pau (Over Bynum because he's our most skilled big and isn't a black hole)