Stern is such a douche.
A loaded question is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption, e.g., a presumption of guilt.[1]
Aside from being a logical fallacy, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda.[2] The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, he will admit to having a wife, and having beaten her at some time in the past. Thus, these facts are presupposed by the question, and in this case an entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and the fallacy of many questions has been committed.[2]
Kevin Garnett has been fined $25,000 for failing to make himself available to the media following Bostons 101-88 loss to the Miami Heat in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals on June 9 at AmericanAirlines Arena.
Garnett will be an unrestricted free agent this offseason.
I assume Stern was trying to equate that with the question of whether the lottery was fixed, but it doesn't work like that. You can answer "no" to the lottery question and not be guilty of something. You can't do the same for the wife-beating question.
Stern needs to retire. He's clearly losing his touch with the lockout and now this.
Yeah, Stern misused it. Rome wasn't giving a loaded question. Stern was trying to use that as an example of a "ridiculous" question.
http://i.imgur.com/Yu9Rg.jpg[/IM][/QUOTE]
LOL
Stern did say "no", several times to Rome's inquiry whether the lottery was fixed, but Rome kept pushing on. Eventually Stern turned the tables on Rome and said "Do you still beat your wife?" as a retort to show how stupid Rome's questioning was.
Right, that's the point. He was making a parallel to Rome's questioning.
Yeah, but he went for the wrong angle. The "fix is in" question is ridiculous because Rome knows the facts and the likelihood of pulling something off like that is super highly improbable.
Rome beating his wife isn't really improbable, assuming he has one.
he should have asked him an improbable question to make a parallel. like, "is it true you are an alien from the planet oiawklafkn?"
But he did say no.
"I have two answers for that," Stern said. "The simple easy one, no, the second, a statement, shame on you for asking."
Then Rome pushed on about it being his job to ask (false) and Stern said, ""No, it's ridiculous, but that's OK." Then Rome pushed on MORE which is when Stern got snippy.
Sorry, but Rome was in the wrong. Stern used a poor example to make his point and came off like a jerk, but Rome has a responsibility to uphold and did not.
Sure, Stern could have used more tact, but either one gets the job done.
Stern did say "no", several times to Rome's inquiry whether the lottery was fixed, but Rome kept pushing on. Eventually Stern turned the tables on Rome and said "Do you still beat your wife?" as a retort to show how stupid Rome's questioning was.
Right, that's the point. He was making a parallel to Rome's questioning because Rome was not going to give up until he got some sort of admission of guilt.
I can't believe the commissioner of the nba talks like that. Pathetic.
I can't believe the commissioner of the nba talks like that. Pathetic.
I know a lot of people don't like Rome, but what was Stern really expecting to accomplish there? If he's going to get all surly everytime someone asks him a question he doesn't like, he should just stick with ESPN so they can toss softballs at him all day.
Rome accuses him of criminal activity, Stern returns the favour.
Stern's the fucking CEO of a multi billion dollar company. Dude is a fucking joke.
Rome accuses him of criminal activity, Stern returns the favour.
So does everyone else in the world, which is why it's fair game and a fair question to ask. Rome didn't pull the idea of the lottery being rigged out of his ass. Maybe Stern should do more to make sure his league doesn't do shit like employ crooked or incompetent refs, or own one of its own teams and veto trades for "basketball reasons" if he doesn't like that perception or those kinds of questions.
You mean like have team representatives and have a 23 billion dollar professional service firm conduct the lottery?
looking through some old photos...
![]()
You mean like have team representatives and have a 23 billion dollar professional service firm conduct the lottery?
come on, the team owned by the NBA wins the lottery? and the potential buyer is juts there? I personally doubt there is a fix but there are many who do think so
This here was great.
Also, i hope stern gets fined for what he said.
If Kobe gets fined and has to apologise on national TV for using the word faggot, Stern should get his balls cut off.
Your defense of stern is odd. It's incredibly hypocritical of stern to do what he did on a national program. If that was one of the players, they would have been fined atleast $100,000.
He's a representative of a major company who regularly holds its players to ridiculous levels of conduct. You don't then get to act like a dick your self.
Thats why it's insane. That he used wife beating is actually incredibly insulting too, especially for a league that has players that have... bad reputations... around treating women all that nicely in the first place, and tries to promote it self as a family/community sport.
What he did directly contradicts many of his own self imposed standards on everyone else.
He called Rome a "faggot"? I missed that part. It's not the same.
Stern is an a-hole, but it's not the same level.
You're right, wife beating is just hillarious.
Rome only really asked once. The follow ups after were more in regards to Stern attacking the idea of even bringing the topic up, which is where we disagree. The prevailing topic on everybody's minds after the lottery wasn't about Anthony Davis or any other player, it was, overwhelmingly, "Was that shit rigged?". Even on ESPN's own broadcast immediately after the analysts brought it up. I don't see why it was so out of line to ask Stern about it.
You're right, wife beating is just hillarious.
You mean like have team representatives and have a 23 billion dollar professional service firm conduct the lottery?
I think you missed the point of the wife-beating question.
Isn't it naive to think the king holds himself to the same standards as his subjects?
Hey look, you came up with an answer that Stern could have given that doesnt involve wife beating. Was that so hard? Stern handled a tough question (which really wasnt thst hard. He could have easily passed if off with a joke about tin foil hats and moved on) worse that most of his players would. He came across terribly.
There is zero actual evidence of the lottery being rigged.
Until there is, I think it's fair for Stern to respond like that.
Your not getting the point of his question back to Rome.
When did I say it was hilarious?
Forget facts or "journalism."I like that Rome is somehow immune to being held to a higher standard. It's his job as part of the media to let his crazy-ass listeners know that the lottery is done by an independent agency with the presence of each and every team representative in the lottery. Stern is basically being accused on conspiracy and then lambasted for calling the conspiracy questioning idiotic.
I like that Rome is somehow immune to being held to a higher standard. It's his job as part of the media to let his crazy-ass listeners know that the lottery is done by an independent agency with the presence of each and every team representative in the lottery. Stern is basically being accused on conspiracy and then lambasted for calling the conspiracy questioning idiotic.
I like that Rome is somehow immune to being held to a higher standard. It's his job as part of the media to let his crazy-ass listeners know that the lottery is done by an independent agency with the presence of each and every team representative in the lottery. Stern is basically being accused on conspiracy and then lambasted for calling the conspiracy questioning idiotic.