theignoramus
Member
why?
why not? Parker's looked better before and after his ankle sprain. I suppose Paul is better at making something out of nothing and he doesnt have a good coach, but why should that count as a minus against Parker?
why?
idk man, the way I see it is that without Paul, the clippers don't make the playoffs. Without tony parker, Spurs take the 5 seed.why not? Parker's looked better before and after his ankle sprain. I suppose Paul is better at making something out of nothing and he doesnt have a good coach, but why should that count as a minus against Parker?
idk man, the way I see it is that without Paul, the clippers don't make the playoffs. Without tony parker, Spurs take the 5 seed.
CP3 just does sosossososos much for the Clippers.
Wow... THREE missed FTs. Might be the difference.
well what I want my PG to do is to create shots and opportunities for the other 4 guys and CP3 is the best at that and he's a better passer than TP.that makes Paul more valuable player to his team, thats it.
imagine if CP3 had a coach like pop
Imagine if Parker flopped like CP3. He'd add an extra 5-7 PPG.
You can't say that. CP3 is a master of his craft,only few have come across as deceptive as Paul. That's like saying what if shaq was a 80% FT shooter.Parker does flop though. a lot.Imagine if Parker flopped like CP3. He'd add an extra 5-7 PPG.
Imagine if Parker flopped like CP3. He'd add an extra 5-7 PPG.
oh it's just an eye poke. The way Gasol reacted i thought he ruptured his acl