343 Industries' Josh Holmes explains design decisions in Halo 5

I love the lip service there at the end. "We read the forums and we take you under consideration" uh no you fucking don't dude, lol. If there are two places who are self-imposing themselves into a soundproof bubble shield, it's 343 and Bungie.
 
Here are a few things that are already make this game 10000000000000000000000000000000000% better than Halo 4

The guns seem a lot harder to shoot

Even though there are some of these abilities, everyone has them. No custom loadouts.

An incredible ranking system. Designed by the guy that made the SC2 one.

SPECTATOR MODE

Clear focus on competitive play

In game weapon timers.
 
Make the game ye want to make, ye're the ones slaving away on it.
I've said my piece on sprint many times, I don't enjoy it's mix into the existing triangle.
Ye can choose to do your own thing, but obviously I'd rather ye continue to not leave me behind.
 
lol so you've played the game then? how would you know if it negatively affects gameplay?

i would say to wait until december 29th to form an opinion as idiotic as yours.

An other classic Waypoint forum post. This is literally what people said before Halo 4 was out, while other people pointed out, what could go wrong. Turns out those people were right.
 
lol so you've played the game then? how would you know if it negatively affects gameplay?

i would say to wait until december 29th to form an opinion as idiotic as yours.
This is just as counter-productive as those going on about Halo copying CoD. :/
 
After playing MCC (as much as it lets me), I think ti's hard to argue that Halo 4 doesn't HANDLE the best (the gameplay is ruined not by the way it plays, but the changes they made to the formula with gun spawns etc.). Halo 2 and 3 are better games, but they feel slow and a tiny bit awkward compared. Halo 3 handles better than 2, IMO.

Destiny still handles better than all of them and I would love if they could let you change your controls to match that.
 
lol so you've played the game then? how would you know if it negatively affects gameplay?

i would say to wait until december 29th to form an opinion as idiotic as yours.

Instead of automatically dismissing the opinions of those who disagree with you, please explain why you think these additions benefit gameplay.

I used to be optimistic about Halo's future too, back before Halo 4 came out. I posted a lot on Waypoint and even tried to justify 343's design choices, even though I knew deep down they weren't good. Then Halo 4 came out and it was a huge disappointment. I don't think 343 deserves the benefit of the doubt.
 
I know I've seen people post their opinions on this before, but what do you want to see in H5 if all the implemented changes are "bad"?

Feel lik complaints will be there no matter what if changes were implemented or not.
 
I know I've seen people post their opinions on this before, but what do you want to see in H5 if all the implemented changes are "bad"?

Feel lik complaints will be there no matter what if changes were implemented or not.

Start with making the game like when it used to be super popular?
 
I wonder if in campaign Agent Locke will be new Halo, with all the new abilities and Master Chief will be classic Halo, no abilities or anything. It would be interesting, for me anyway.
 
Start with making the game like when it used to be super popular?

Go more in depth.

I feel like people would still complain that the game hasn't changed a lot and 343 is lazy developers. Sure as hell wouldn't be happy if H5 played very similar to H3.
 
I know I've seen people post their opinions on this before, but what do you want to see in H5 if all the implemented changes are "bad"?

Feel lik complaints will be there no matter what if changes were implemented or not.

I think stuff like Thrusters would be good changes, although it seems a bit too powerful as it is. It can be used in more than one direction and isn't a crutch unlike Sprint. It doesn't require any changes to how the maps are designed. It complements the existing gameplay instead of destroying it like Sprint.

Other good changes that aren't related to the mechanics are spectator mode and the new Forge palette. The gameplay doesn't have to be completely changed for it to feel new and fresh.
 
I'm already disappointed that some people are already bringing up call of duty. It's as If no one actually understands the point of this post in the depths of one of the most passionate and hardcore halo fan sites left and I doubt people will. This post is taken out of context and the OP doesn't even try to portray that to the people now reading it.

Take the time to read and understand what he's saying before we "copy call of duty if old".

Ugh.



Pretty fucking harsh post without any explanation. Nice!

Please explain to use how you would do things differently if you were in charge of a multi million dollar, established franchise from times past in an ever changing and evolving (fastly) fps market. Go ahead.

I would build the entire experience around a ranked, skill based experience where social is meant for casual and where to practice. I remember in the H3 days where people would offer to play with you to help you get better.

So is this the thread where I post stupid oneliners like a pretentious douchebag that thinks that I know how to make games better than 343?


Ohhh man did you say halo? More like CoD-lo!

To be fair, 343 doesnt exactly have a lot of equity after 4 and MCC.

OH IT'S SMART SCOPE!!!
It's ADS

Even if it functions like a regular halo scope/zoom, it covers half of your screen.

It's ADS, if they want people to buy in they need to stop acting like we are idiots.

Good thing that they designed it specifically so that it doesn't have to be used.

How do you know? From the 3 small maps they showed? Based on history most maps will be larger for Sprint. Remember Complex?
 
Funny they seemed to manage to release a fully functional game before MCC came out.

You mean with the file share browser completely gone for months after launch, neutered forge, custom game, and theater options, with no communication for months as to what they were gonna do about any of it?

Yea, that's a pretty great release. It hurts when the people that are mods on your forums make 100 page threads about the lack of options in your game.
 
I think they should focus on appeasing the core Halo fans and the good word will spread out from there. Look at games like Bioshock - a game not designed for the general public.

Bioshock has a giant arrow that points you in the right direction. It was pretty obviously designed for a mass audience.
 
Bungie doesn't even know what made Halo great. They kept making the base movement speed slower, had no idea where to place weapons/power ups, which is the better starting weapon, made melees more prominent, etc...

They then started adding in useless crap like Sprint, equipment, armor lock, etc...
 
After playing MCC (as much as it lets me), I think ti's hard to argue that Halo 4 doesn't HANDLE the best (the gameplay is ruined not by the way it plays, but the changes they made to the formula with gun spawns etc.). Halo 2 and 3 are better games, but they feel slow and a tiny bit awkward compared. Halo 3 handles better than 2, IMO.

Destiny still handles better than all of them and I would love if they could let you change your controls to match that.

Yep, easily. Was in the SWAT playlist and it was jarring going from 2A to 4. 4 just handles and plays sooooooooo much better than 1,2 and 3. I kinda always knew it did, but when you go straight from one of the earlier games to 4 like that it really hits home.

That was one thing 343 really did nail though. Much more so than Bungie. Even now, I keep reading how people are enjoying Destiny's gunplay and I think it's the worst thing about Destiny. The fact that the MCC is giving me the opportunity to see how superior Halo 4's handling is, Destiny's is now starting to make sense.
 
Seriously, guys?

PEOPLE CAN RUN.

HULKING SUPER SOLDIERS IN HYPER-ADVANCED POWER ARMOR CAN RUN TOO.

I can not BELIEVE so many people are railing at the fact that there's a sprint button in a halo game..

Exactly. It's childishness at its most bizarre. Highly augmented Spartan Super Soldiers can actually run... Oh god no, Halo is ruined!
 
You mean with the file share browser completely gone for months after launch, neutered forge, custom game, and theater options, with no communication for months as to what they were gonna do about any of it?

Yea, that's a pretty great release. It hurts when the people that are mods on your forums make 100 page threads about the lack of options in your game.

Oh i thought his post was about MCC not working, not about features he thought should be in the game, since that is two completely differing arguments. Must have misunderstood.

When people say 343i just copied AW, do they realise AW's gameplay was first shown at E3 2014?

Obviously 343i has the ability to see into the future and copy things that weren't even shown yet! You didn't know this?
 
When people say 343i just copied AW, do they realise AW's gameplay was first shown at E3 2014?

If it functions like halo zoom, then it's not ADS. ADS in a regular sense isn't just some visual thing.

Stop, it's ADS. It covers half my screen. It limits my entire view so I can no longer see whats going on around me.

edit: If you were right why not give an option for classic zoom instead of alienating and already irritated fan base after MCC?
 
I want to give them the benefit of the doubt, the problem is they've stumbled from one shot show to the next since they took stewardship of the franchise.

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
 
Stop, it's ADS. It covers half my screen. It limits my entire view so I can no longer see whats going on around me.

Then you don't use it? Not like they're giving any penalties for hip fire with all the no scoping i have been seeing with DRM, and BRs in the footage.

I want to give them the benefit of the doubt, the problem is they've stumbled from one shot show to the next since they took stewardship of the franchise.

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.

It's not even about "giving the benefit of the doubt" at this point. The beta is around the corner and people are making big sweeping judgements on something they have yet to even play. How about actually trying it out before shitting on it. Or does that make too much sense to today's "gamer".
 
Exactly. It's childishness at its most bizarre. Highly augmented Spartan Super Soldiers can actually run... Oh god no, Halo is ruined!


No no no no. Haven't you been reading the thread? Spartan Super soldiers shouldn't be able to run because in real life, people can also swim, do backflips, lie down and a whole host of other stuff that doesn't relate to shooting in a war zone. So you know, that's why they shouldn't able to run.
 
Exactly. It's childishness at its most bizarre. Highly augmented Spartan Super Soldiers can actually run... Oh god no, Halo is ruined!

Love drive-by posts like this from people who confirmed several times that they don't care about Halo MP and usually only stick to campaign/single player modes.

It's really not as simple as you make it seem to be. Nobody has anything against Sprint and all these abilities in campaign mode. This discussion is all about MP.

Then you don't use it? Not like they're giving any penalties for hip fire with all the no scoping i have been seeing with DRM, and BRs in the footage.

The BR has a x3 scope and the DMR has a x4 scope. How are people going to shoot in mid to long distances, if they simply "don't use it".
 
Stop, it's ADS. It covers half my screen. It limits my entire view so I can no longer see whats going on around me.

edit: If you were right why not give an option for classic zoom instead of alienating and already irritated fan base after MCC?
Dude, it's not ADS. ADS increases accuracy, lessens spread, gives you an advantage, it means hip firing is not viable. That's what ADS is. Just because this new form of zoom is visually different doesn't mean it's ADS.

As for giving you the option, who knows, maybe it will change. The game is almost a year away, things can change.
 
I will play the beta before I decide if I don't like it, but I know for certain they are not pursuing the same thing that I liked about Halo.

At least I can always play MCC. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
 
Then you don't use it? Not like they're giving any penalties for hip fire with all the no scoping i have been seeing with DRM, and BRs in the footage.
What is this? Did you ever zoom in Halo before? If it is the same as past Halo's only with a new look then you're going to be using it a lot.

"Don't use it." Lmao
 
Exactly. It's childishness at its most bizarre. Highly augmented Spartan Super Soldiers can actually run... Oh god no, Halo is ruined!

I just dont get these posts. Do you really think this is a valid reason to include game mechanics? Realism in a floaty space man game?
 
Dude, it's not ADS. ADS increases accuracy, lessens spread, gives you an advantage, it means hip firing is not viable. That's what ADS is. Just because this new form of zoom is visually different doesn't mean it's ADS.

As for giving you the option, who knows, maybe it will change. The game is almost a year away, things can change.
I think it was said that Smart Scope does grant an accuracy bonus to weapons like the AR & SMG.

I don't mind it as much, but I wish they retained the same old zoomed-in appearance for weapons that actually have a scope; this seems more like a regression.
 
Top Bottom