The Grim Heaper
Member
In due time, friend.I don't get the first case:
Why was Junie in the court in the first place? Was she just a spectator? Where did Ted disarm the bomb? Against whom was the original case before the explosion?
In due time, friend.I don't get the first case:
Why was Junie in the court in the first place? Was she just a spectator? Where did Ted disarm the bomb? Against whom was the original case before the explosion?
Sure, have a friend or coworker either get killed or need to be defended, but when they're always on the scene of the crime as it happens the line between being a lawyer, detective or victim/participant becomes far too blurred.
I don't get the first case:
Why was Junie in the court in the first place? Was she just a spectator? Where did Ted disarm the bomb? Against whom was the original case before the explosion?
But they were always kind of detective games at its core. Hell, even many lawyer related works of fiction can devolve in Detective stuff.
The game is also fully translated in the form of a youtue walkthrough:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzQuGq21Dlc&list=PLjRAU3j6cNaixtcLDixVlaz7Vcthm0rmh
Are there any persons who are indifferent to the game?
I remember AA1 which i played on my phone. I liked the characters and the cases were always quite interesting. Never finished it though.
I recently started AA5 due to my megaten/fire emblem credit and thought why the hell not.
The first case was totally boring as the solution was given away in the intro. The second case so far is also quite boring and I don't know why.
However, what's bugging me the most are the characters. They are all goofy in some way and unrelatable. Plus, they all have totally irritating animations they constantly repeat after 2 textboxes. This was a huge surprise as I found the characters in aa1 very cool and relatable...but aa5 really overdoes it with its comic relief-like characters.
Tldr: will the game get significantly more interesting?
Case 2 has some of the most unlikable, irritating characters in the history of video games. L'Belle, Filch, and Jinxie can all go die in a fire.
Case 2 has some of the most unlikable, irritating characters in the history of video games. L'Belle, Filch, and Jinxie can all go die in a fire.
I agree. If case 2 didn't drag it down so much, AA5 might have been my favorite in the series.I didn't like case 2 at all, but the rest of the game was fantastic.
And YES please kill Jinxie. I loathe her throwing this talisman thing at you ALL THE TIME.
Circus case.
Just... circus case.
Worst case in the entire series. Prove me wrong.Circus case.
Just... circus case.
I still don't get why they started case 2 withshowing the villain. Ruined the entire case for me.
Since the way the crime is committed is so ridiculous and elaborate that knowing who did it doesn't matter, it's all about how it was done.
I didn't realise the DLC case took place before the main ones. Halfway through it and wish someone had told me to play it before cases 4/5.
Worst case in the entire series. Prove me wrong.
I can'tWorst case in the entire series. Prove me wrong.
How could you do that man....I'm almost done with the game, just started case 5. It's been amazing so far (although a bit easy compared to the previous games), and I think I have an idea about who's behind case 4/5.
CASE 5 CULPRIT PREDICTION:I'm thinking it will be Fulbright. The other characters that are currently introduced don't make sense to me and it seems a bit late to introduce someone new. Fulbright was present at the crimescene during the murder on Clay and he was also in court when the bombing happened. It would also be easy for him to tamper with evidence I guess, and I found it hard to believe he wouldn't have looked at the fingerprint results on that lighter... The only thing I can't think of is a motive, but that could be explained later I guess. Although I think I'm right about this, deep down I hope I'm not, since I like Fulbright and would love for him to return in a sequel.
I can't
Anyone who does is off their rocker. Any case that penalizes you for pressing the witness
I'm almost done with the game, just started case 5. It's been amazing so far (although a bit easy compared to the previous games), and I think I have an idea about who's behind case 4/5.
CASE 5 CULPRIT PREDICTION:I'm thinking it will be Fulbright. The other characters that are currently introduced don't make sense to me and it seems a bit late to introduce someone new. Fulbright was present at the crimescene during the murder on Clay and he was also in court when the bombing happened. It would also be easy for him to tamper with evidence I guess, and I found it hard to believe he wouldn't have looked at the fingerprint results on that lighter... The only thing I can't think of is a motive, but that could be explained later I guess. Although I think I'm right about this, deep down I hope I'm not, since I like Fulbright and would love for him to return in a sequel.
Oh god, I knew there was something that made me dislike that case, & it was the fact pressing certain statements took away your life. So glad that never happened again. I think that case made me abuse the save system from the rest of the series.I can't
Anyone who does is off their rocker. Any case that penalizes you for pressing the witness, and introduces 75% life penalties (yay save scumming) is shit in my eyes.
Is there something wrong with me when I like 2-3 more then 3-3? Granded they both are lacking but still...
I liked case 2 also. The Amazing Nine-Tails is incredible.I loved case 2
2 cases in and I enjoyed both of them. Thebut other than that I found most of the characters to be humorous in a good way.girl who keeps plastering you with charms is annoying.The mayor and his silly possessed act made me laugh in particular and the guy who can't help but steal shit
This is my first AA game. Should I seek out the DS games to play? I assume the answer is a Yes....
hell, i miss phoenix wright! ...
completed the third case, & i'm very disappointed in the series' overall change in tone from mania to melodrama. i loved the whacked/frantic nature of the original trilogy. yeah, it could occasionally get a bit syrupy, but the primary emphasis was always on sheer lunacy. this game (so far, anyway), not so much. i'm finding most of the characters to be very weak (the detective, the prosecutor, & the mind-bogglingly vapid case 3 client in particular), the humor to be much more orchestrated shtick than out-of-left-field crazed, & the cases themselves, tho sometimes cleverly staged, still very easy to solve...
just not for me, & i will refrain from saying any more. other than, yeah, a bit more fan service, & a few more familiar faces, would've been greatly appreciated...
ps: how could i forget - the music. it almost redefines 'bland'. the arrangements are just so lifeless. what've they done?...
My God, the auction I was taking part in ended at over $112! Why would people do that instead of just buy them new at Amazon for around $75 for then all new???
Since the way the crime is committed is so ridiculous and elaborate that knowing who did it doesn't matter, it's all about how it was done.
The insanity of eBay.
Wait till the buyer doesn't pay and doesn't honor the auction.