2 were union. 1 was not.Here's what I think happened: They fired this guy because he needed to be in the wrong to save the other two officers. If he was the first cop there and he considered the guy to not be a threat, then they were wrong to shoot. But if he was wrong procedurally, then it's easier to argue that they were right to feel threatened and were right to fire.
I think it was about saving the longer serving cops and not who was actually right. And that's a pretty good barometer of what's wrong with our police forces in the US.
This is what people are talking about when they say there is an institutional problem with the police. Not all cops are assholes. But all cops are complicit in a system where they protect their own at the expense of the public they are supposed to serve.
But what about all those "good" cops that play catch with young black boys? Or give minorities ice cream after pulling them over?Nope. I'm fucking done ever trying to defend the Institution of Police here in the states. Here is this fucking golden opportunity to clearly show that police who do their job properly and keep their heads while saving lives are the examples departments want to have other officers follow and you fucking fire him and kill his pension?
BUT OOHHHH Now the officers that fucking MURDERED THE BLACK GUY get medals and hand jobs and paid time off and all sorts of other shit cause FUCK justice and whats right and rewarding brave, confident and strong officers. We need weak fucking trigger happy pussies around here!!
FUCK these people. So fucking tired of this garbage.
It's both. There are plenty of piece of shit cops. The profession attracts sociopaths.
Oh and the man he refused to shoot?
Unfortunately, two more cops then showed up, and quickly shot Williams dead.
...
As it turns out, Williams’s gun wasn’t loaded. There’s no way any of the police officers could have known that. But it does show that Mader had read Williams correctly — he wasn’t actually a threat to anyone but himself. His life could have been saved.
GF: "Help, my boyfriend is going to kill himself!"What kills me is "what's the point of calling the cops?" In this scenario? The GF called because she wanted someone to help him, not kill him! What do they do? They kill him? What is their job that they are doing and putting themselves at risk for here??? Is it helping the guy? Cause he's dead...
Look at the rules of engagement for the actual U.S. military.Its weird how a video game is advocating more cautious use of violence then the actual real life police in the US. No really, that game basically only allowed you to shoot (without punishment) when you were already shot at.
This is what people are talking about when they say there is an institutional problem with the police. Not all cops are assholes. But all cops are complicit in a system where they protect their own at the expense of the public they are supposed to serve.
Look at the rules of engagement for the actual U.S. military.
Hell, just look at ROE Cards which are basic guidelines and not the full rules.
The U.S. military has actually loosened their rules of engagement to deal with the fact that insurgent fighters hide in the civilian population and police would still regularly wind up in at least a court-martial by them.Just had the same conversation with my brother. American police force RoE would not hold up to the Geneva Convention. They would literally be war crimes.
After responding to a report of a domestic incident on May 6 in Weirton, W.Va., then-Weirton police officer Stephen Mader found himself confronting an armed man.
Immediately, the training he had undergone as a Marine to look at “the whole person” in deciding if someone was a terrorist, as well as his situational police academy training, kicked in and he did not shoot.
“I saw then he had a gun, but it was not pointed at me,” Mr. Mader recalled, noting the silver handgun was in the man’s right hand, hanging at his side and pointed at the ground.
They wanted him to serve the communities want to suicide by copWhat a infuriating and depressing story. The Police system in America is just fucked up.
Here's what I think happened: They fired this guy because he needed to be in the wrong to save the other two officers. If he was the first cop there and he considered the guy to not be a threat, then they were wrong to shoot. But if he was wrong procedurally, then it's easier to argue that they were right to feel threatened and were right to fire.
I think it was about saving the longer serving cops and not who was actually right. And that's a pretty good microcosm of what's wrong with our police forces in the US.
Columbo would never succeed as a 21st century cop
Shit is like a dark comedy...
If you want to experience even more rage head on over to /r/protectandserve and check out the comments on this incident. Whole lotta cops defending his firing, because by not shooting first he "endangered innocent lives"
RIP Nana Ruth. Never forget.If you want to experience even more rage head on over to /r/protectandserve and check out the comments on this incident. Whole lotta cops defending his firing, because by not shooting first he "endangered innocent lives"
If you want to experience even more rage head on over to /r/protectandserve and check out the comments on this incident. Whole lotta cops defending his firing, because by not shooting first he "endangered innocent lives"
How in the FUCK is this real? How has a fucking sick joke or twisted parody become actual real life and completely normal?
God dammit! Fucking depressing man.
What the?
It sounds to me like he's a great human being and a great cop. The people who came in after him and shot the victim are the terrible cops. It confuses me that you think they should protect "order" and not people in America, that should never be the case, and it absolutely should be the other way around.
Ok I see my post being quoted with incredulous outrage.
What exactly is being objected to?
That cops aren't here to protect us?
That a person can be too good to be a cop?
That if you see that the police dept from the top down are not the good guys, it makes this firing understandable?
I might have a bit of snark in my post... But I don't get it. If you need me to expound on why, I guess I could... but it seems the majority (all?) of the thread would be in agreement with me. The story is proof enough.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAnd...irton_terminates_officer_who_did_not_fire_at/Can you link that? I can't find the post.
Who knows. Maybee what the other officers saw was way more dangerous than what the article and fired officer stated.
He could have violated some policy, really hesitated when he shouldn't have, or be getting completely and unfairly fucked by a shitty department.
Just going by the article, it sounds like he got reall lucky and at the worst needs some remedial training.
Reaction is always slower than action. I was trained that if someone is holding a gun, and appears to be threatening you or anyone else, you open fire.
Even if it's pointed down. They can raise it and get shots off faster than you can react. Getting killed in an Academy scenario taught me that quite definitively.
I never trust a news article to accurately recount facts.
He took a gamble with lives. I can not condone this. He got lucky.
I'd like to hear the entire story before I judge, I suspect there's a lot the media has left out
Where's the GoFundMe for this guy?