Earthstrike
Member
I don't think you want to really know what I think. I'm pretty sure I see what you're trying to get across and honestly I have no desire to go down that discussion path with you. It's clear that no matter what I say, you will just push it aside and say the docs/courts know better. I'll end it right here for ya.
If some parents had a child at a hospital suffering from cancer that they were treating with chemo, and the parents came up with a plan to take him off chemo and instead treat him with sungazing, would you want the "courts and doctors" to not have the right to interfere? Do you not understand the horrible precedent this could set, if we take away medical institutions capacity to ensure patients are receiving the best treatment possible based on medical science?
Children aren't property.
By the way, people do want to know what you think. It's the internet. Noone is scared of anyone since people's locations are anonymized. As far as I or any other rational person is concerned, claiming we don't really want to know what you think, seems more like a way to back out of an argument instead of having the capacity to use your wits to demonstrate your beliefs are correct with reasoning and evidence.
I'm not having any of it. Doctors and medical researchers have been attacked by society enough in cases like these.