firehawk12
Subete no aware
Man, that twist was so terrible. Ugh.
I had totally forgotten that happened to her comic counterpart.The dying.
What is that from?You're probably right, but I can dream!
![]()
That said, I think Ward might gonna come back as redeeming anti-hero. Also nooooo, not Hand. :C
What is that from?
What if Simmons is a HYDRA agent? She is after all, "getting better at lying".
Could explain why she was so adamant that they send Skye's blood to the Hub - she wanted Hydra to know what she had found.What if Simmons is a HYDRA agent? She is after all, "getting better at lying".
Well that episode was insane. And I was totally wrong on Hand. The Whedon's got me!
If this keeps rolling the way they claim it's going to all the way to the end of the season it'll be one hell of a 7 ep back end run.
What if Simmons is a HYDRA agent? She is after all, "getting better at lying".
Well at least they are making up for the first half of this show.
Is the Clairvoyant? Because that makes the most sense.Armin Zola
I was kinda worried they were gonna pussyfoot around the whole HYDRA thing, but I'm glad they tackled it head on. Sux for anyone who saw this before Winter Soldier, though
I think after next week's episode it would be fair to have unspoiler barred discussion but that's me.So how long are we gonna do TWS spoilers for? I mean the entire episode went over most of the major plot points anyway.
Gemüsepizza;107508641 said:Great episode, but I didn't really like.what Victoria Hand did there. First she wanted to kill Coulson and his crew just because of an assumption that he may be working for Hydra, and then her stupid test for Simmons - what was the point of that? Pulling a gun to their heads and demand that they swear allegiance to Hydra, and then probably shoot them when they do that because they want to survive? That's just crazy. Most people in such situations would say anything to save their lifes, that doesn't prove anything
So how long are we gonna do TWS spoilers for? I mean the entire episode went over most of the major plot points anyway.
It wasn't a test to see if they were Hydra. It was a test to see if they were loyal to SHIELD enough to die for it. If they weren't that loyal, they'd become HYDRA eventually so neutralize the threat early.
Well, I guesswon't be running S.W.O.R.D anytime soon :|Victoria Hand
Gemüsepizza;107510597 said:Like I said, in such a situation most people would say anything to save their life at this moment, even if they would never want to really join Hydra. It makes a lot of sense to say yes in order to get in a better tactical position. So this "loyality test" is a failure, and her "kill everyone" rhetoric is just batshit insane.
Most people, yes, but we're talking about agents of SHIELD. People who go through years of high-end training, drilling and education to become the best at what they do (infiltrating and spying) and not lose their cool the moment somebody points a gun at them.
Most people, yes, but we're talking about agents of SHIELD. People who go through years of high-end training, drilling and education to become the best at what they do (infiltrating and spying) and not lose their cool the moment somebody points a gun at them.
Are you talking about Abigail Brand?
Most people, yes, but we're talking about agents of SHIELD. People who go through years of high-end training, drilling and education to become the best at what they do and not lose their cool somebody points a gun at them.
As if POWs don't refuse to say loyalty oaths all the time.
People just want to hate this show so badly.
oh right, mix up.
Since Spidey belongs to Sony, HAMMER will never come into play.
Yeah, but the smart thing to do 100% of the time is to live long enough to complete your mission.
These guys are spies not clergymen.
Gemüsepizza;107511467 said:So you think their training would rather make them want to die instantly instead of lying in order to get into a better tactical position and maybe get a second chance to fight against their enemy? Then I think their training is bad. I would lie and look for an opportunity to take them out. A better test would be to give them an empty weapon and demand that they shoot a SHIELD prisoner. That would be a real loyality test
Yes, and that's exactly why it's imperative to know whom you can trust. Since Hand didn't know who was Hydra, what other way was there for her? Somebody who is ready to die at gunpoint for refusing to switch allegiances frivolously is obviously not going to switch allegiances in the long run. Imagine they would've said "yes let me join Hydra", what should Hand have done with them? This was a situation in which the base was basically in a state of war, and in which people get killed.
Would you want somebody you know who has your back at your side, or somebody who you know might waver at the first sign of trouble?
Where did you get the notion that Hand had the opportunity to get a prisoner? Before the scene with Triplett and Simmons, she had 5 other agents at her side. Why do you think she would've risked dragging a prisoner - a person who also would likely try to escape? She didn't have the time nor resources to get a prisoner, drag them around and keep that prisoner under guard to make sure they don't run away.
And given the fact the Hub was basically at a state of war, and there was no way of knowing who was friendly and who was hostile, that would've been too much of a risk. For Hand and her people, and also for the prisoner.
Gemüsepizza;107512517 said:I would want to have someone at my side who will do what is necessary to win, not some idealistic idiot who wants to sacrifice his life for some dumb words and empty phrases nobody will ever hear outside this room. Dead people can't win a fight. And the test I have described above is much better suited to test their loyality.
Gemüsepizza;107512517 said:I would want to have someone at my side who will do what is necessary to win, not some idealistic idiot who wants to sacrifice his life for some dumb words and empty phrases nobody will ever hear outside this room. Dead people can't win a fight. And the test I have described above is much better to test their loyality.
Gemüsepizza;107512517 said:There were two persons, Simmons and the other guy. She could have given one of them a weapon to kill the other guy.
They're everywhere.
Well unfortunately most rigid chain-of-command organizations do not want that.
See my edit towards your post, your post came between my response and the post I responded to.
As for the rest of your post: This has nothing to do with idealism or words. But sure, go ahead, grab the guys who will backstab you at the first opportunity.
And what if the one you give the gun to was Hydra, and that Hydra ended up killing a SHIELD agent?
"Just say whatever you need to, to survive. Pledge allegiance to the enemy, give up vital information, do whatever they want you to do. We understand. Your life is on the line. And maybe at some point you can flip on them and come back to our side. We'll totally trust you after all that."
Gemüsepizza;107513546 said:What? Who said that? Exactly, nobody. You can lie and still be loyal to SHIELD. Government agencies all around the world do this all the time... If you are dead you are useless.
Eh, most of the broad strokes that were addressed tonight in the episode are fine and good, but I don't know if we should be talking about minor plot points from TWS since they're not necessarily relevant here. Let's keep the tags going for at least another week and then we can assess.I think after next week's episode it would be fair to have unspoiler barred discussion but that's me.
It's a tough call, but I think it's an inevitability that the design of this show existing in a wider and current universe calls for.
Of course. It's already aired. Just tag preview discussion and stuff from TWS that wasn't mentioned tonight. Make sure to label your tags so we know what's from TWS and what's from the preview. Thanks.so we can finally talk about this episode w/o spoiler tag right.