Wolfgunblood Garopa
Member
When you're a star (or even just a lawyer in Alabama's case) they'll let you call high schools to gentlemanly proposition the girl students
M'constituent.When you're a star (or even just a lawyer in Alabama's case) they'll let you call high schools to gentlemanly proposition the girl students
So now we have testimony from two other woman that state Moore sexually assaulted them as underage girls.
He groped a girls butt, presumably she was under12 years old and her. Im was a client of his.
This is really bad, something horrendous is going to come out and all the pedophile defense force will have nowhere else to run.
In the article I read she was 28, if its the same allegation you are referring to (Tina Johnson)
Senator Jones.
Why was the Al Franken thread locked but this one isn't?
Interesting.
title was a blatant falsehood
Really? Cause last time I checked 2 is "multiple"
Why was the Al Franken thread locked but this one isn't?
Interesting.
title was a blatant falsehood
If you want to go down that road, the title for this thread is also a blatant falsehood, yet remains open. This thread title states as fact Roy Moore is a paedophile, when in actual fact it is allegations that have yet to be proven.
The thread title of the other thread, while erroneous in stating it was multiple women sexually assaulted, was more true in the sense that Franken has actually conceded that at least one allegation is true.
Lol. Personal attacks because I speak the truth. Are you going to apologize to me when it's proven?
Go on record right now saying Moore was actually the D.A. in 1977 and his assistant didn't initial his signatures "D.A.". Go on record saying Moore was not the judge on her divorce case.
This should be good lol.
Yep. Get used to hearing the truth.
A sitting US Senator has just admitted to sexually harassing at least one woman.
I can't say anyone should be surprised. It's Al Friggin' Franken after all.
He needs to resign immediately. Your thoughts on this disgusting revelation, please.
Oh my god.
Oh my god.
If you want to go down that road, the title for this thread is also a blatant falsehood, yet remains open. This thread title states as fact Roy Moore is a paedophile, when in actual fact it is allegations that have yet to be proven.
I calls em hows I sees em. Dude's a kid fucker.
the 2nd one constituted harassment but wasnt sexual
If you want to go down that road, the title for this thread is also a blatant falsehood, yet remains open. This thread title states as fact Roy Moore is a paedophile, when in actual fact it is allegations that have yet to be proven.
The thread title of the other thread, while erroneous in stating it was multiple women sexually assaulted, was more true in the sense that Franken has actually conceded that at least one allegation is true.
Ladies and Gentlemen, from the same guy, who just posted this:
The bias is so blatant, it's disgusting.
And people wonder why there are no posts on this forum anymore
My opinions in one thread don't necessarily reflect my opinions in another thread in a 1:1 ratio.
Franken should resign. So should Trump. Moore should go to prison for the rest of his life. None of that will happen.
Also the second woman is a partisan hack and known liar.
You should learn what falsehood means.
Im well aware of what the term falsehood means. Im using the terminology the poster I was replying used.
Interesting. You should learn what a false equivalency is, because youve (inadvertently) demonstrated it in your post.Franken should resign. So should Trump. Moore should go to prison for the rest of his life. None of that will happen.
Also the second woman is a partisan hack and known liar.
You should learn what falsehood means.
Interesting. You should learn what a false equivalency is, because youve (inadvertently) demonstrated it in your post.
You should learn how to post things that arent abjectly stupid.
Why was the Al Franken thread locked but this one isn't?
Interesting.
Franken also admitted it and said sorry
You should learn how to post things that aren't abjectly stupid.
You should also learn what a non sequitor is, because youve (inadvertently) demonstrated it in your post.
What an unfortunate time for you.
If only 90% of your 66 posts weren't shitposts or idiotic rambling.You should also learn what a non sequitor is, because youve (inadvertently) demonstrated it in your post.
What an unfortunate time for you.
If only 90% of your 66 posts weren't shitposts or idiotic rambling.
It's okay, every single one of his posts was made in the past three weeks, despite having an account since 2009.
Wait, that's weird isn't it?
It means he knew his posting style would've gotten him banned before this site lost its moderators. Now, it seems, anything but the most blatant of racism goes. See the political leanings thread where one poster suggested that oppression of minorities doesn't exist in America because there are at least 2 wealthy black people.Not having a go at you or anything, but what does that mean?
So Trump was again asked this, and was like, well we can't give this seat to a liberal Democrat. lol
But of course.
So Trump was again asked this, and was like, well we can't give this seat to a liberal Democrat. lol
But of course.
Ugh
but its ok to give it to a pedophile?
I really wish people would make the effort to use the correct terms. If all he is, is being pedophile, there's no problem in giving him whatever position. If, however, he is a sex criminal guilty of crimes, then he shouldn't be given anything.
Pedophile = innocent person with unfortunate attraction
Sex criminal (with pedophilic context) = bad person that deserves punishment and being shunned by society
Uhm, he is accused of sex crimes against minors... Not just one. I believe there are eight women now.
I really wish people would make the effort to use the correct terms. If all he is, is being pedophile, there's no problem in giving him whatever position. If, however, he is a sex criminal guilty of crimes, then he shouldn't be given anything.
Pedophile = innocent person with unfortunate attraction
Sex criminal (with pedophilic context) = bad person that deserves punishment and being shunned by society
I really wish people would make the effort to use the correct terms. If all he is, is being pedophile, there's no problem in giving him whatever position. If, however, he is a sex criminal guilty of crimes, then he shouldn't be given anything.
Pedophile = innocent person with unfortunate attraction
Sex criminal (with pedophilic context) = bad person that deserves punishment and being shunned by society
If all he is, is being pedophile, there's no problem in giving him whatever position.
Hi russian troll!I really wish people would make the effort to use the correct terms. If all he is, is being pedophile, there's no problem in giving him whatever position. If, however, he is a sex criminal guilty of crimes, then he shouldn't be given anything.
Pedophile = innocent person with unfortunate attraction
Sex criminal (with pedophilic context) = bad person that deserves punishment and being shunned by society
I really wish people would make the effort to use the correct terms. If all he is, is being pedophile, there's no problem in giving him whatever position. If, however, he is a sex criminal guilty of crimes, then he shouldn't be given anything.
Pedophile = innocent person with unfortunate attraction
Sex criminal (with pedophilic context) = bad person that deserves punishment and being shunned by society
Are you fucking serious?
Are you fucking serious?
If you want to go down that road, the title for this thread is also a blatant falsehood, yet remains open. This thread title states as fact Roy Moore is a paedophile, when in actual fact it is allegations that have yet to be proven.
The thread title of the other thread, while erroneous in stating it was multiple women sexually assaulted, was more true in the sense that Franken has actually conceded that at least one allegation is true.
So its been a few weeks now, have there been any developments in regards to evidence for or against Moore? Charges laid ect?
Last I heard his lawyers were calling for the year book to be released to an independent examiner for verification