zeomax
Member
I hear always this claim but there is not a single video or any radar data available that shows this acceleration. Only stories but no prof.to accelerate well beyond the structural limits of any existing aircraft?
I hear always this claim but there is not a single video or any radar data available that shows this acceleration. Only stories but no prof.to accelerate well beyond the structural limits of any existing aircraft?
It's hard to take anyone seriously who opens up with Fuck you, fools. My interest in this topic is casual. I'll leave it to the other guys to shit on your claims. Which they already have and your response was REEEEEEEEEEEEEHow the f*ck would you know, are you an airplane engineer or optics expert?
Of course not, you're merely parroting the sh*t that you picked up from these alien conspiracy nutters.
None of these objects behave outside of the ordinary.
Great, more tone policing because you cannot refute any of my arguments. If only you'd apply a modicum of the same skepticism towards these bullsh*t UFO stories this topic wouldn't be such a laughable pile of garbage.
Oh spare us the whining, your insufferable UFO conspiracies are an attack on people's intelligence. Doesn't seem to disturb you in the slightest though.
You didn't even have the decency to watch the frikkin' videos, but went straight for the b*tchy drama.
I don't have to tell you sh*t, you're the ones making the extraordinary claims. The fact that you've presented bokeh effects and F-18 heat signatures as proof for alien UFOs is not only reason enough to ridicule any other such claims of that nature but also demonstrates how little fact checking is actually being done in threads such as this one.
How the f*ck would you know, are you an airplane engineer or optics expert?
Of course not, you're merely parroting the sh*t that you picked up from these alien conspiracy nutters.
None of these objects behave outside of the ordinary.
How does a camera lens effect impact a radar system that corroborated what the pilot saw? Radar gives starting position, end position, and time of transit. Anyone can calculate average velocity and estimate acceleration from that.
If you think I need to be an aerospace engineer or optics specialist to do that, you don't live in the real world.
I believe the stories you refer to are the actual cockpit audio between the pilots and the flight tower back at the carrier. Yeah, so far we only have the audio that states that it was picked up by radar. If you're looking for something more than audio released by the US Navy, then you will just have to wait and hope that what becomes declassified is more substantial than literal Navy pilots and flight technicians discussing what they're seeing both literally and through their instruments, as though that isn't credible enough.I hear always this claim but there is not a single video or any radar data available that shows this acceleration. Only stories but no prof.
You first UFO is a bokeh effect:
An this is an F18 filmed by an infrared camera (you can see the heat emissions coming from the jet engines):
There you go, your supposed "evidence" for UFOs.
Don't believe every sensational headline you come across.
He's obviously a damn fool just like the rest of us. He's lying to us for.... reasonsObama confirmed it tho, so is a semi mic drop, just not for debunking
I hear always this claim but there is not a single video or any radar data available that shows this acceleration. Only stories but no prof.
He's obviously a damn fool just like the rest of us. He's lying to us for.... reasons
The sad thing, strange headache is probably in good company in this thread as most of us are skeptical of a lot of the stuff shared in the thread. Speaking of my personal beliefs and wants, I really hope we're not being visited and ignored by some technologically superior race, because it just doesn't seem right for them to violate our airspace in broad daylight and practically ignore us without any attempts of contact... seems rather foreboding to me.
My interest in this topic is casual. I'll leave it to the other guys to shit on your claims. Which they already have and your response was REEEEEEEEEEEEE
You are a piece of work. First off, why would I waste a minute on your fringe Busted videos that look like YouTube click-bait when you clearly haven't spent any time perusing the thread?
Doesn't sound washed out to me, isnt she credible?, or did she know that a decade later she could sell ufo merchandise.....
I mean yeah, more than likely those are nothing. The problem is those are probably the least compelling cases.
The only people reeeeeing in this thread are the ones whose conspiracy bubbles are being popped. For somebody who has a a mere "casual" interest in this topic, you're taking this rather personally.
It's always the same when somebody enters these frikkin' information bubbles... people freak out when confronted with some basic truth.
Fringe? I forgot that you'd rather waste your time watching the crappy conspiracy fairytales by these pied pipers of Roswell who are barely a step above the flat earthers and palm-readers.
You've filled more than 50 pages with this crap, get real.
It's always these ex-military "witnesses", going on about their civilian lives for decades until they suddenly decide to crawl out of the woodwork smelling a juicy paycheck for a 5 minute interview.
You don't get it, there are no "compelling" cases for alien aircraft. If there was, it wouldn't be sold on youtube by charlatans for ad revenue and militaries all over the frikkin' world would take these cases more seriously. It's all bullsh*t and you guys are helping to perpetuate it. What's worse is that optical illusions, out of focus videos and infrared images are being sold as solid evidence by the "UFO community", which should tell you enough about their intentions and level of scrutiny. Why even believe anything else these people have to say?
You could as well believe the Elvis sightings.
Why so angry? Who hurt you today? Are you hoping to "wake up" us fools to save our souls? What's the beef here?The only people reeeeeing in this thread are the ones whose conspiracy bubbles are being popped. For somebody who has a a mere "casual" interest in this topic, you're taking this rather personally.
It's always the same when somebody enters these frikkin' information bubbles... people freak out when confronted with some basic truth.
Fringe? I forgot that you'd rather waste your time watching the crappy conspiracy fairytales by these pied pipers of Roswell who are barely a step above the flat earthers and palm-readers.
You've filled more than 50 pages with this crap, get real.
It's always these ex-military "witnesses", going on about their civilian lives for decades until they suddenly decide to crawl out of the woodwork smelling a juicy paycheck for a 5 minute interview.
You don't get it, there are no "compelling" cases for alien aircraft. If there was, it wouldn't be sold on youtube by charlatans for ad revenue and militaries all over the frikkin' world would take these cases more seriously. It's all bullsh*t and you guys are helping to perpetuate it. What's worse is that optical illusions, out of focus videos and infrared images are being sold as solid evidence by the "UFO community", which should tell you enough about their intentions and level of scrutiny. Why even believe anything else these people have to say?
You could as well believe the Elvis sightings.
You don't get it, there are no "compelling" cases for alien aircraft. If there was, it wouldn't be sold on youtube by charlatans for ad revenue and militaries all over the frikkin' world would take these cases more seriously. It's all bullsh*t and you guys are helping to perpetuate it. What's worse is that optical illusions, out of focus videos and infrared images are being sold as solid evidence by the "UFO community", which should tell you enough about their intentions and level of scrutiny. Why even believe anything else these people have to say?
You could as well believe the Elvis sightings.
Well, look on the bright side, if they're ignoring us at least that means they're not extremely hostile, otherwise they would have destroyed us/the planet a long time ago. I made a post a couple of pages ago warning against inferring motivations of possible alien intelligences or projecting your own psychology on to them. For starters, they would probably have no idea what you mean by "violating airspace".The sad thing, strange headache is probably in good company in this thread as most of us are skeptical of a lot of the stuff shared in the thread. Speaking of my personal beliefs and wants, I really hope we're not being visited and ignored by some technologically superior race, because it just doesn't seem right for them to violate our airspace in broad daylight and practically ignore us without any attempts of contact... seems rather foreboding to me.
So militaries all over the world have programs that study these objects going back to WW2. Several presidents, Generals, Admirals, pentagon officials, intelligence officials, prime ministers, astronauts have all come out, but we're supposed to believe it's all a coordinated, worldwide hoax dating back to WW2 to sell merchandise in the 2020s? That's some forethought.
So militaries all over the world have programs that study these objects going back to WW2. Several presidents, Generals, Admirals, pentagon officials, intelligence officials, prime ministers, astronauts have all come out, but we're supposed to believe it's all a coordinated, worldwide hoax dating back to WW2 to sell merchandise in the 2020s? That's some forethought.
Oh and here is more debunking of this military footage presented as phony pseudo-evidence by UFO profiteers:
Mysterious object "disappeared" because it's an infrared glare of an object going over the horizon. Could by a whale coming up the surface to let out a fart, who gives a sh*t. Your military certainly doesn't and for good reason, because it's f*cking nothing.
What's important is that no breaking of any kind of physics is involved.
You don't even listen to your own sources. The guy outright admitted he had no idea what it is in that video, and said it was a balloon hours before those videos. A balloon lol
What's important is that no breaking of any kind of physics is involved.
Dude, we don't have a remotely complete understanding of the laws of physics. What we have, is at best a work-in-progress model. What else needs to be said?
Dude has given an explanation that is not only far more probably but also way more credible, but no it must be aliens because.... no reasons given.
That's like saying Zeus is making lightning because you don't know how electrostatic discharge works.
There's only one thing that is out of this world, and that's your selective reasoning.
No one said it was aliens first off. Secondly, you're not even watching the videos or keeping up with Mick. He said it was like 3 different things. All of which are very different.
Thirdly, it's yet again another case of Mick targeting grainy videos that are softball pitches and ignoring the more compelling cases.
Well, look on the bright side, if they're ignoring us at least that means they're not extremely hostile, otherwise they would have destroyed us/the planet a long time ago. I made a post a couple of pages ago warning against inferring motivations of possible alien intelligences or projecting your own psychology on to them. For starters, they would probably have no idea what you mean by "violating airspace".
Have you ever listened to Bernardo Kastrup argue his theory that consciousness is the fundamental nature of our universe, not matter? He's pretty much an accepted member of the scientific community.And so far, over these 54 pages of insanity, you've shown nothing that would even contradict our "rudimentary" understanding of physics.
No one said it was aliens first off. Secondly, you're not even watching the videos or keeping up with Mick. He said it was like 3 different things. All of which are very different.
Thirdly, it's yet again another case of Mick targeting grainy videos that are softball pitches and ignoring the more compelling cases.
Mick has been asked several times to look at more compelling cases with scientific data, but no, he'd rather debunk grainy videos and cast doubt on softball pitches.
Didn't think the pyramid ufo video had any radar data?, only the video we saw, which was a iPhone looking through a nightscope, I mean that alone could cause odd effects, never thought the pyramid ufos were much to shout about
Unless the info on that video has changed?
I hear always this claim but there is not a single video or any radar data available that shows this acceleration. Only stories but no
1) You have people in this very thread, including you, outright taking these videos as proof for alien visitors. See your own comment above, ffs!
2) The hell you talking about? I watched the full video and even took screenshots out of it because you guys can't be arsed to watch these videos. Kindly f*ck off with these assumptions. He gave you one explanation for the sudden disappearance of the object and different explanations of what said object could be. All of these explanations are better than "aliens".
3) All of your dumb videos are grainy and of bad quality, which is also the reason why all of these "proofs" are bullsh* in the first place.
There are NO compelling cases WITH scientific data. When 99,99% of the thousands of images and testimonies are outright fake crap, why assume it would be different for the 0,01% remaining? You can't expect single individuals to debunk each and every bullsh*t claim, ain't nobody got time for that. The burden of undeniable proof lies upon the shoulders of those making the extraordinary claims.
Have you ever listened to Bernardo Kastrup argue his theory that consciousness is the fundamental nature of our universe, not matter? He's pretty much an accepted member of the scientific community.
And isnt this dude channel about debunking, I thought anyone out to make money wasn't to be taken serious? Yet Mike here is making money off youtube, doesnt that by the same logic make him unreliable? Since he has a vest interest to debunk it out the gate....
Do you have any proof for the 99.99% figure? Are you a statistician?
What does ontology have to do with any of this?
Yeah, because the "alien skeptic and debunking" market is such a profitable one, amirite? Contrary to the million dollar industry that is alien tourism and UFO book sales. Dude has 20k subscribers and also produces tons of other science content, clearly he's only in it for the money. Meanwhile you have these UFO charlatans outright shilling for their books.
Yes, people like the Amazing Randi
What does ontology have to do with any of this?
Yeah, because the "alien skeptic and debunking" market is such a profitable one, amirite? Contrary to the million dollar industry that is alien tourism and UFO book sales. Dude has 20k subscribers and also produces tons of other science content, clearly he's only in it for the money. Meanwhile you have these UFO charlatans outright shilling for their books.
At least that dude thoroughly debunked the fraud that was Uri Geller.
Thank him for that, otherwise we'd still have people making money on spoon bending schemes.
He still has a vested interest to debunk, and generate views and revenue, thats what he does, debunk.....
Different scale, same operation
I 100% agree with ufo shills and their books, look a Dr Greer, he's a grifter of the highest level, and if you had read through most of this thread, u would know that
What does ontology have to do with any of this?
Ontology has something to do with everything.
You were making a fuss about the laws of physics. I was simply pointing out that our understanding of the nature of things is still very much in flux.
That's the best you came up with?
You'd think over the 60 year course of modern alien UFO research, the community would h
1) You have people in this very thread, including you, outright taking these videos as proof for alien visitors. See your own comment above, ffs!
2) The hell you talking about? I watched the full video and even took screenshots out of it because you guys can't be arsed to watch these videos. Kindly f*ck off with these assumptions. He gave you one explanation for the sudden disappearance of the object and different explanations of what said object could be. All of these explanations are better than "aliens".
3) All of your dumb videos are grainy and of bad quality, which is also the reason why all of these "proofs" are bullsh* in the first place.
There are NO compelling cases WITH scientific data. When 99,99% of the thousands of images and testimonies are outright fake crap, why assume it would be different for the 0,01% remaining? You can't expect single individuals to debunk each and every bullsh*t claim, ain't nobody got time for that. The burden of undeniable proof lies upon the shoulders of those making the extraordinary claims.
You are the one who was prattling about how I can't make comments because I'm not an expert earlier. What makes you an expert on this?
You're even watching the videos you post, that's what I'm talking about Mick is just as bad or worse than the UFO believer bullshit, he prays on people just the same to generate views, the same reason he stays away from the best cases.
Fair enough I guess, but you'd think he would prick the more profitable industry.
Also his videos are not monetized otherwise he would make them 10 minutes long, so clearly he's not really trying to make money with this.