Like holographic jets hitting the twin towers?
I had my quick burst of "I'm just asking questions" about the 9/11 stuff like 15-16 years ago, and as if it wasn't already an embarrasment when I finally snapped out of it, hearing people seriously talk about how there weren't really any planes and it's just a computer effect / hologram made me finally realize that there really is an insane side to the world of conspiracy theorists
The clowns at reeee are claiming its all probably hypersonic drones from russia and china, and that its "right wingers" who believe its aliens.
Fucking idiots man
The clowns at reeee are claiming its all probably hypersonic drones from russia and china, and that its "right wingers" who believe its aliens.
Fucking idiots man
NYT article
1. No Evidence Aliens (but could be)
2. No Evidence Russia/China (but could be) "but not really"
3. Not ours
4. Abilities surpass anything we have and stumps scientists and military experts.
Military conclusion: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
What's really surprising to me is the variety of the physical appearance of the craft. If it's Russia etc, they have a lot of different variations or different countries all with these crafts. In that case, it would mean a few countries have leapfrogged the US, which isn't impossible but that would be funny. The US spends all this money on defense and isn't even the tog dog anymore, not even close actually.
"Some critics out there say oh that report is just looking at advanced aerospace vehicles, in the sense of what the Russians are going to do in a few years or whatever. But of course if you read between the lines and you see we are looking at warp drives, tranversable wormholes and stargates... I mean we aren't looking for what the Chinese are going to make next year. This program is trying to address and solve quote "the UFO problem" |
"Some people will say oh this is just looking at advanced aircraft production, then how do you explain we'd have a whole program on the statistical drake equation in this report" |
The guy in this video says they don't know if it's optical phenomenon. If they haven't been able to rule that out, then what really is their evidence? I'm increasingly more thinking that what we've now seen is "all" what they have and they don't have any clearer videos of anything, but more of the same.
Having that triangle video part of that clip doesn't do it any favor either.
What comes to this "tic tac" thing, are there ANY videos where that shape can be seen that is not shot in night vision mode or with an IR camera, and where the object is in focus? If someone says they saw a tictac shaped object, that testimony doesn't yet mean anything if that person saw it through a monitor from a night vision or IR camera.
makes no sense
This seems to be the official government stance on the whole subject.
And when you really actually look at what they have been saying the past couple years "But it's aliens"
Dr. Hal Puthoff on the AATIP program report
Quote:
"Some critics out there say oh that report is just looking at advanced aerospace vehicles, in the sense of what the Russians are going to do in a few years or whatever. But of course if you read between the lines and you see we are looking at warp drives, tranversable wormholes and stargates... I mean we aren't looking for what the Chinese are going to make next year. This program is trying to address and solve quote "the UFO problem"
Quote:
"Some people will say oh this is just looking at advanced aircraft production, then how do you explain we'd have a whole program on the statistical drake equation in this report"
Sure it could be optical, but...
4 pilots saw it from 2 different vantage points, the object also tracked his descend as the object ascended mirroring him, it was backed up by radar (no video), but thats why they were sent there in the first place (so an optical phenomena causes radar blips?) and yeh an IR video because they couldn't see it visibly, only on IR, and that was a different 2 pilots, that took off after
And it was 2002, tech was different
But yeh it could be an optical illusion/phenomena, and the video isng compelling, unless you account for how fast it would have to be moving to go across the screen at that rate (I cant remember exactly)
It seems more likely it was an object, what that was........well if its exactly as described what does it sound like it is? To you? Open to opinion really
The CAP point thing is weird detail to me. Sure, they say only a handful of people should know about it, but why it couldn't be so that there are more people, maybe at higher level, who know about it but them knowing about it isn't known to this handful of people who he is talking about?
I mean, they see something on a camera that ends up in a place only few people in the military allegedly knows about. If it's an actual object that is actually truly reacting to the pilot, there aren't only two options, but three. When they say only a handful of people knew about the CAP point where the object went, sure, you could make a claim that someone outside of the army knows this detail only handful of people should know about (meaning that maybe a country like Russia or China would have that specific knowledge of things, or aliens have that specific knowledge). But wouldn't the clearest explanation be that this is known to someone else from the military, and they just don't know that this person knows about it too? And that maybe they are testing some equipment with these people and it's essential to this test that people wouldn't know about any of it beforehand and maybe even afterwards?
To me a detail like that is too wild to be taken as something someone outside of the army has been able to figure out and is deliberately using that knowledge to move to that place. But it would make sense if it's some equipment being tested by some people who are in some way connected to that group of airforce.
This just throws a wrench in the whole "drones bro" conversation every time I think about it. The sheer consistency and history of these reports going back to the 1950s
I've found this video so compelling, I had to watch it a few times.....for analysis reasons of course
This just throws a wrench in the whole "drones bro" conversation every time I think about it. The sheer consistency and history of these reports going back to the 1950s
Planetary invasions are a Hollywood fantasy. The logistics involved with getting enough personnel to a planet, in order to subjugate it, are just impractical. Orbital bombardment also makes no sense, if you intend on farming any resources from the planet, or inhabiting it. If you can cross interstellar distances, you can probably find another inhabitable planet closer to you, or one with plenty of resources in your own solar system. Alien invasion stories came about before we discovered that planetary systems were probably the rule rather than the exception.It would be funny if in 50 years earth gets invaded by aliens and these were the scouting missions. Kept secret by governments because they were scared of species as advanced as ants compared to these dudes.
Planetary invasions are a Hollywood fantasy. The logistics involved with getting enough personnel to a planet, in order to subjugate it, are just impractical. Orbital bombardment also makes no sense, if you intend on farming any resources from the planet, or inhabiting it. If you can cross interstellar distances, you can probably find another inhabitable planet closer to you, or one with plenty of resources in your own solar system. Alien invasion stories came about before we discovered that planetary systems were probably the rule rather than the exception.
If aliens were to have visited us already, they would be within 50 light years of us, based on the earliest such claims. That's because the "first light" of human communications couldn't have traveled very far since the first radio waves were emitted. Ignoring how weak those first ones were, that's still an incredibly tiny radius compared to the size of the galaxy. Having not only an intelligent form of life, but one advanced enough to travel between stars, would suggest that not just life, but intelligent life is incredibly common in the universe.
The odds of our tiny pin prick of the galaxy having all the intelligence in it is astronomically small. It does beg the question though, why would they hear us with our weak energy sourced emissions, but we can't hear them? We search the entire EM spectrum for patterned signals, and haven't heard even a peep.
Perhaps we are an anomaly so rare that we really are the only one of our kind. And our egos tell us that there must be more of us, because we desire that outcome more than the idea that we are alone.It does beg the question though, why would they hear us with our weak energy sourced emissions, but we can't hear them? We search the entire EM spectrum for patterned signals, and haven't heard even a peep.
Perhaps we are an anomaly so rare that we really are the only one of our kind. And our egos tell us that there must be more of us, because we desire that outcome more than the idea that we are alone.
How else can we explain that we haven’t heard even a peep? I’m a skeptic either way. We just won’t know until we can see it with our own eyes, which may be never, and that’s really sad. Again, I think that sadness drives me, and all of us, to want to believe we aren’t the only ones. But maybe our situation is so anomalous, so rare, that there has never been anything like us in hundreds of billions of years, and there won’t be anything like us again, for hundreds of billions of more years, perhaps trillions.
Man I need to lay off the weed this is a fun thread tho. I don’t know what I believe, just throwing shit at the wall here...
Whatever the energy source is could solve countless problems worldwide and domestically.
Or start new even bigger problems.
Access to an unimaginable amount of power doesn't only mean that there's now means to do a lot of good and make everyone's lives easier, but it also could mean it's now possible for some bad people cause even more bad things.
As I've said earlier, what if this tech is something that when fully revealed would be like giving nuclear bombs to the hands of ordinary people? Which reminds me that could it be inevitable that as technology improves at a faster and faster rate, people will eventually have powers and means to create seriously damaging equipment in their own homes... Like, at certain point of technological advancement it will be inevitable that a depressed enough person could wipe all life dead from this planet.
Pretty much how i feel
It wouldn't change anything, who governs its? Who dictates who can have it? See how the problems will start almost instantly.....you giving this to China and Russia? Or the other way round, they gonna give it to the west? Lol of course not, We're as a planet untrustworthy still
We're galactic children, who need all our toys taken away, and need a fundamental restart, before we can be trusted with unlimited power sources
Earth is full of Psycho's with egos and fears, probably best not to have unlimited power sources until we can all get a long, or at least not be constantly trying to wipe eachother and the planet out all the time
But still show me the 4k ufos please, its 2021
We search the entire EM spectrum for patterned signals, and haven't heard even a peep.
Most of your post was spot on as to why it is unlikely that these craft are extraterrestrial, but this is not a good argument. When Fermi had put forward the paradox we had barely started investigating the universe with EMF detection, and we still have not done anything significant. SETI and all the radio telescopes on Earth are basically the equivalent of scooping up a gallon of ocean water each day and deciding that is completely representative of the content of all the oceans on Earth. They still occassionally get tricked by signals emanating from Earth and bouncing around inside the ionosphere. It's the best we can do for now, of course, but our efforts are miniscule, infinitesimal really, against what is needed for good sampling system. Fermi Paradox-type arguments will not be valid until we have at least several hundred years of much broader investigation done, and even then that is probably not enough.
So basically, before the failure of the Manhattan project, some other group started making super secret tech too, but this could outmaneuver WW2 pilots with ease and shoot off in the blink of an eye. But they had the foresight to somehow keep it secret for almost 80 years because it could fall into the wrong hands.
And apparently it's this huge super secret group of people or they're constantly moving around from country to country too, just looking at water or trees and shit and flying in space according to Kevin Day
And how did they develop the metal alloys 80 years ago that far more sturdy than stuff we have today, or will likely have for decades? Another massive breakthrough in total secret.
And were they drones back 1940s etc? Because humans dont do well pulling those G forces. I think the lower estimates are 50gs
What about the "wow" transmission?
It wasn't able to be found again and they don't know specifically where it came from because of equipment limitations. Assuming it was an alien civilization or even a natural phenomenon, that doesn't really make sense unless they just happened to pick up the last seconds of a supernova or something similarly big, which is ridiculous. It feels more like a error to me, or them picking up an Earth-based signal. Just looking at the Wikipedia article they tried to debunk it being Earth-based with the wavelength being in a regulated band, which is lulzworthy.
If its human tech, I'm more amazed actually and jealous that they can fly around basically unchallenged and go everywhere anytime. Maybe they've explored the solar system? I wouldn't be surprised if those craft are 20x faster than ours in space too and safer maybe.
Everything also depends on those testimonies being true and no-one bullshitting then and no-one bullshitting now.
What about the "wow" transmission?
Why would all the testimonies need to be true.
NASA Spacecraft Detects a ‘Hum’ in Interstellar Space
Scientists say NASA’s most distant exploring spacecraft has recorded a continuous ‘hum’ beyond our solar system in the area between the stars.learningenglish.voanews.com
When the plasma waves are changed to an audio signal, the tone of the sound changes, added James Cordes. He is an astronomy professor at Cornell University and the co-writer of the study. That sound is “a bit eerie," he said.
Not sure if space travel would be possible. If its human tech, they are controlled from earth. They would need to have monitoring equipment where they can see where it is and see what's around it, and they would need to have wireless control system that goes insanely far without lag, unless maybe they are fully AI controlled things that record stuff without a need for anyone monitoring anything here.
I'm talking about any reports that are seen as the truly real deal.