Fact of the matter is that this election isn't going to change a whole ton of bin Laden's complaints. He has a lot of deeper hatred that stems from shit way before George W Bush came into the picture. In order to appease him, Kerry would have to change not just Bush's policies, but 20 years worth of policy. Bin Laden might prefer Kerry, but at the end of the day, Bush's defeat isn't going to satisfy him or make us significantly safer. Bin Laden's just playing the game the best way he can.CNN said:In the video, bin Laden said he decided to attack the twin towers of the World Trade Center in 1982 after the invasion of Lebanon by Israel.
"In those dark moments, my soul was thinking about lots of things that are hard to describe but they brought a feeling to do something about the aggressors and punish them," he said.
"When I looked at the towers that were destroyed in Lebanon, it occurred to me that we should do the same to them. And the towers in America should have fallen down in order for Americans to feel what we have felt."
He underscored it was U.S. foreign policy that led to the attacks, saying, "Bush has told you that we do not like freedom. Then, why didn't we hit Sweden?"
Mashing said:Yeah, you have a point but what else can you do with people like him? Attacking America like he did was just stupid... He has less power now than he did before... is that what he really wanted?
I don't pretend to know his motives though, maybe he has some grand 10 year plan or something
CVXFREAK said:Al Jazeera is painted as some unprofessional and evil news agency, but their webpages looks as professional and informative as other agencies.
Based on WHAT? How in the world can they present any evidence to back up that kind of statement?Ripclawe said:Fox reporting the thinking by DOJ is that the first tape with the American was a message to signal they are ready, and Bin Laden tape is the Go signal.
CVXFREAK said:Al Jazeera is painted as some unprofessional and evil news agency, but their webpages looks as professional and informative as other agencies.
DaMan121 said:I swear, if this election isnt the highest turn-out in history, then as Americans, you guys have ALOT more things to worry about than the frigin terrorist bogeyman.
Shompola said:He has almost an endless of support now. Look there weren't many muslims reall caring about him pre-9/11. Now you see a great amount of so called intellectual indonesian students ready to die for Bin Laden, even malaysians love him. Not to mention other radical muslims and/or anti-americans in general. I am not kidding, there are ultra leftists who love what he does simple because of his so called anti-american stance.
JetSetHero said:They're a news network that present news. Simple as that.
Shompola said:ultra leftist, extreme leftist, anarchist? Are you shocked? It's true though.
Shompola said:Uhh it was an example of that Bin Laden is still quite popular among various different people ranging from students to anarchists. Thus Bin Laden is still powerful.
bune duggy said:http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041029/ap_on_re_mi_ea/bin_laden_tape_15
it almost sounds like he is saying that Bush knew of the attacks (that bit of intelligence that was ignored, maybe) and that he just didn't care. It also seems like bin Laden wants Kerry to win and is laying it on Bush thick.
Mashing said:If anyone let Bin Laden influence their votes... then they should be kicked out of the country... why would anyone listen to what that bastard has to say? That's horrible even thinking about it... why would an American care what he says?
JetSetHero said:But you're using the term 'left' to describe horrid things. That annoys me. Why does it have conotations of terrorism with you? I don't get it. Bah!
Shompola said:Ok, how about Bin Laden has support among various kinds of people who have anti-americanism or/and anti-west as the common denominator.
Ripclawe said:Fox reporting the thinking by DOJ is that the first tape with the American was a message to signal they are ready, and Bin Laden tape is the Go signal.
Mashing said:If anyone let Bin Laden influence their votes... then they should be kicked out of the country... why would anyone listen to what that bastard has to say? That's horrible even thinking about it... why would an American care what he says?
What valid reason would they have for suppressing the tape?Associated Press said:Before the tape was aired, the State Department asked the government of Qatar to discourage Al-Jazeera from broadcasting it, a senior State Department official said.
KingGondo said:Yeah, I hear that Al Jazeera's actually a good network. They're well-funded, they just often present the view from the Middle East side.
Pochacco said:He forgot about Poland..
jk.
I think what he meant is, if he hated freedom like Bush said he does, he could attack any democratic nation (such as Sweden). But no, he chose to attack the US because for other reasons.
Ripclawe said:Fox reporting the thinking by DOJ is that the first tape with the American was a message to signal they are ready, and Bin Laden tape is the Go signal.
KE04 said:He's saying he doesn't hate freedom per se, rather he hates American foreign policy in the Middle East. Thus, our current problem.
Now, if Sweden were to join up with America, you'd have a problem.
-jinx- said:What valid reason would they have for suppressing the tape?
Are you really this stupid? Have you read any of the writings from him and his gang?
JetSetHero said:But you're using the term 'left' to describe horrid things. That annoys me. Why does it have conotations of terrorism with you? I don't get it. Bah!
BTW, Sweeden does have an army and special forces.
Perhaps you can explain to me why OBL and his band of terrorists haven't attacked Sweden, even though they share many of the same freedoms that makes America so great?
Mohammed Bashar Al-Faidhy, spokesman of the Association of Muslim Scholars, addressed the 'Iraqi resistance' in an open message at a press conference broadcast by the Arab satellite channels yesterday. He stressed the point that this was the first time for the association to openly address the 'resistance'.
He started by reiterating the association's stand of supporting armed resistance against occupation forces. He said it is a legitimate right for any occupied people according to divine laws. He added that the association welcomes the peace talks between the Iraqi government and local leaders in Fallujah, Ramadi and Sammara BUT that does not imply recognition for the Iraqi interim government, and as long as the negotiations do not provide cover for the foreign presence in Iraq they have the association's blessings.
He then proceeded to the message, excerpts below:
To our brothers in the Islamic Army of Iraq. We wish to inform you that we totally understand the extreme rage that is boiling in your hearts regarding the French decision to ban the Hijab in their schools, and we share you your dissapointment. We officially condemned the French decision at the time... However, killing the two hostages without considering the grave consequences of such an act would be harmful to our cause and would isolate us from our international support... Our goal is to besiege the Americans politically in every spot of the world and this act is not serving that goal... You can see how the agents of the occupation are already using this incident against us... It is our duty as scholars to point out to our brothers what is wrong and what is right... France as an anti-occupation country has been helpful to our cause... You might say that the French stance is not an altruistic one and that they have their own political interests that caused them to disagree with the Americans, and I am not going to say that is not true but it is also our goal to turn them against each other to serve our cause so France has a strategic importance for us... Killing the two hostages is also not helpful to the 6 million Muslims in France... I beseech you to reconsider this and to release the two hostages and to promise us not to commit any act that would harm our cause in the future... We also hope that this development would permit the French government to reconsider their decision to ban the Hijab... When we become a free country Inshallah we will pursue this goal by diplomatic means.
RiZ III said:These guys live in caves. We're being threatened by cavemen! Am I the only one that finds this slightly absurd and funny? This guy is sitting in some cave on the other side of world making empty threats. OOooo im so scared.
We've bombed the shit out of THEM, huh? I'm not sure that you're drawing a distinction between Islamic extremists and mostly innocent Iraqis. Actually, I'm not sure that you're CAPABLE of drawing said distinction.RiZ III said:They caught us unaware. Since then we've bombed the shit out of them. If it wasn't for Bush's lack of leadership skills, Bin Laden would've been dead a while back. Either way, I don't see these guys as any major threat. I don't see them pulling off any major attack on US soil again. I don't know, I guess I'm just not as paranoid as everyone else.